Blue In Green
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
- Messages
- 2,359
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
@Iranians: This guy is a newly registered troll. don't take his bait. I think he's that supposedly "Morocan Jew" but Pakistani wahabi troll, who's created the new account.
Let alone the irony of making the above two statements in a single post, but as Americans say, either put up or shut up. Either do what you say in the real world, or shut it.
Well said, I don't think any of us should give them the time of day. Especially in the "Iranian Chill Thread" of all places.
Saudi Arabia military is borderline incompetent. That is why it sends mercenaries and asked Pakistan to go into Pakistan.
This is not my opinion, literally online is filled with US advisors and generals (and other western nations) who have lamented how poorly trained Saudi Arabia is.
In Yemen, your targeting data and intelligence was supplied by the US. Whenever they did it on their own they end up indiscriminately bombing weddings and shops. You know the same thing Arabs criticized Assad over, but are strangely silent when it comes to Saudi Arabia.
Also not sure how much damage Saudi can inflict on Iran. Along the coastline and its oil terminals are pretty much where Saudi could get some hits in.
But it’s BMs from China are very inaccurate and low in numbers to be used against tactical targets. It’s cruise missile supply is short range and low.
Iran’s air defense are quite decent and if Russia hasn’t knocked out Ukraine’s ancient air defenses yet...then not sure Saudi Arabia will do any better having to flying across the PG.
Not to mention nearly every major Saudi airfield will be hit by Iran in opening salvos of war alongside major ammo depots and oil terminals. So even if planes do take off where will they land?
So Saudi damage will be limited to Iranian islands and coastline and maybe 100KM into Iranian territory via air. Certainly air raids to Tehran or Northern Iran are highly unlikely.
Again this assumes scenario is strictly an Iran vs Saudi Arabia scenario. Which again I think is unlikely. Both sides don’t like direct warfare and prefer behind the scenes. This doesn’t have to do with MAD, but mostly because both sides are highly pragmatic.
If it’s US vs Iran, then Saudi Arabia will gladly let US do the work and play the victim card rather than directly responding.
Anyway I’m sure if India established air bases in Sri Lanka and used them to attack Pakistan that Pakistan itself would also attack Sri Lanka airbases for hosting the attack. This is within the rules of war and engagement. If you give shelter to the enemy.
Don't engage these idiots brother, you're way above them and you don't have to waste your time trying to convince these radical asshats who actually think about "re-annexing" Iran as if it was theirs to begin with.
You won't get anywhere, just ignore and move on.