That was just a minimum pressure which was sanctions and it was not due to them either but it was due to the nuclear talks. They can't just solely force a sanction on a country this is beyond their limit or outside of the grey areas.
If you consider this as "minimum" pressure, frankly, you should offer counter-examples of what you deem to be maximum pressure. No, Iran's currently the most sanctioned country on earth. Trump called it "maximum pressure" because that's what it really is.
Let me tell you why it failed first of all it was simply not in the US policy at that time hence Israel was ignored completely instead they chose dialogues etc etc. You see they failed and again they would have been able to remove 2 none-state actors bordering them. There is limit to what they can achieve and what they can't and there is generally a grey area and the reason for that is because if the interests in the region collide to much it can explode the region into massive war which is not in the interest of the US policy hence as I said they can only navigate a grey area and their powers is entirely inflated by you.
Yeah. Iran's power limits US ability when it comes to coercive measures. But that doesn't mean Isra"el" was ignored.
But all in all alas I will now tell you when this policy that you have mentioned previously will occur or how it will occur. JPCOA will return and the deal will be inked but others have already begun taking measures meaning the region is adjusting to it and realize this deal is bound to collapse one way or another meaning everyone has started option B specifically in Egypt, Turkey, UAE and Saudi Arabia meaning multiple players will go nuclear overnight this will turn Israel into a little state in the middle that can be bullied at will and the Americans won't either be able to come to aid them in such scenario because this will shift the entire power structure in the world hence the only solution for them will be to stop Iran from gaining the nuclear weapons in order for the others in the region to not take drastic measures.
We shall see. Iran is not after nuclear weapons by the way. Iran wants its rights under the NPT to be recognized, that's all. Namely its right to a full domestic nuclear fuel cycle.
I don't think we're going to see a revival of the JCPOA in the years to come. The US regime wants to renegotiate the deal and make it even more restrictive for Iran, and Iran under the Raisi administration is not going to bow to these conditions.
This is where 2030 comes into play ones the deal ends couple of months following it the Iran war will officially start. The war on Iran has bigger implications for the west than it actully does for Israel hence it comes down to 2 options allow Iran to get the bomb or 2 allow everyone in the region as panic responds to get it hence as consequence losing the power balance in the entire region.
But you see, the difference is that the US regime has no fear of other states in the region going nuclear in the military sense. For Washington, a simple phone call is enough to discipline Turkey, Saudi or Egypt in this regard. It's either that or instant "regime change", and the interested parties know it.
In scenario B they will eventually have to sacrifice Israel down the line because pressure will come and they will chose between fighting a nuclear war for Israel or walk away they will chose the later sacrificing Israel in order to keep ties and alliance with some of them against China-Russia bloc that is growing and will keep growing down the line. At the end of the day it is just a tiny outpost and will chose their interests over it when the competition will get more hectic and they wouldn't want to lose ground at the cost of a small nation hence sacrificing them would be the right choice example this has happened already many times example like the Kurds they were sacrificed to the Turks etc etc. Mark my words in scenario B Israel will down the line be sacrificed as a bargaining chip just like that cold blooded by the Anglo-Saxons. Their true interests go from Italy to north in the EU countries including UK and Australia. They w ill happily bargain with an outpost.
This is where I disagree. Isra"el"' is not an American outpost. It's the other way around, America is a zionist outpost. Zionists firmly dictate US foreign policy in West Asia and North Africa. So the US is never going to sacrifice Isra"el" for its own interests.
The following book offers a glimpse into this reality:
All in all to prevent a world in scenario B ''Iran must be sacrificed'' this is unavoidable according to their calculations and again this is not lead by the jews but other elements in the west. They will bring in a huge coalition both from outside and inside the region and the intially disarming campaign will be over in like 1-3 months and the reamining 3-4 years will be reconstructing a new government in Iran. The reason this will be over quickly is because the coalition will be to vast and Iran has no regional backing but all in all the better outcome for everyone however is scenario B and that Iran comes thru with an out-break and making scenario B a reality in that case Israel will be sacrificed down the line as bargaining chip
For the time being, they have no military option against Iran, no matter how vast an alliance they may muster. And if Iran senses they are building up for an actual invasion, Iran can opt for nuclear armament on short notice. Then her enemies will be deterred.
