What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

Because Iran just need 4-5 nukes for Israel, its likely already there today.

Fordow site is nuclear strike proof. Iran will just need a week or so to revenge an Israeli all-out strike.

Even if not today, it will have enough advanced centrifuges and material to reach that level very soon.

Don't overestimate nukes vs. wood houses and nukes vs. deep underground targets.

As said: Israel could launch 300 nukes against Iran and it would survive.
Iran just needs 4-5 to revenge such a strike and let Israel collapse.

Again: Latent MAD
Nothing is nuclear strike proof. The only question is how many nukes will it take to reach the site.
And honestly I doubt more than one will be needed. The shock alone would disable the site. And most likely the site would collapse anyways.

1630073708265.png

Israel knows where to strike and how deep it needs to penetrate.

You really think Iran will survive 300 nukes? A single nuke to 10 of your biggest cities and to 10 of your biggest military bases would crumble anything and everything going on in Iran.
 
.
Nothing is nuclear strike proof. The only question is how many nukes will it take to reach the site.
And honestly I doubt more than one will be needed. The shock alone would disable the site. And most likely the site would collapse anyways.

View attachment 773513
Israel knows where to strike and how deep it needs to penetrate.

You really think Iran will survive 300 nukes? A single nuke to 10 of your biggest cities and to 10 of your biggest military bases would crumble anything and everything going on in Iran.

Nukes don't penetrate rock much.

300 nukes will badly maul Iran sure, but not sufficiently to stop it from launching 5 nukes on Israel, and that's already MAD.

Also with advanced centrifuges: Who knows, there might be harder sites than Fordow, if not now, then in near future.

Against any other nuclear power this concept would not work, it just works against Israel, because its so small, flat and surrounded by enemies.

5 shots
 
.
Scenes unseen in Iran for 8 long years! President Ebrahim Raisi personally visits hospital treating corona patients, as well as huge pharmacy in Tehran managed by the Iranian Army Ground Forces. There, he patiently listens to people's grievances and wishes, and directs the personnel to help people out!

Compare this to the liberal, western-apologetic Rohani with his aristocratic type of demeanor and attitudes. We remember how for fear of getting contaminated, Rohani restricted Majles speaker Ghalibaf's access to cabinet meetings right after the latter paid a visit to corona patients. We remember how seldom Rohani held direct meetings with ordinary citizens, and how he liked driving around in bullet proof limousines, hardly ever leaving Tehran's posh northern districts unless obliged to do so in the framework of his official functions.

Governing style and messaging are of great import in politics. And here they also reflect and translate a political ambition, a concrete program and a mindset. Yes, a President of the people, working for the people is in charge again! Which in the Islamic Republic ought to be a basic requirement for every official, in line with the lofty ideology and principles of the popular Islamic Revolution of 1979. Kudos to the courageous and honorable seyyed Raisi.


 
Last edited:
.
If the headchoppers from Syria are able to make their way to Afghanistan, they have new jihadistan to grow and re arm....right next to Iran’s borders.

Let’s hope this doesn’t happen.

Compared to Syria at the height of the civil war, Afghanistan presents only one of the factors fostering the development of this group: weak state institutions. Other than this, none of Afghanistan's neighbours would let volunteers cross into Afghanistan nor let them establish trans-border supply lines, let alone support them covertly in any fashion - as opposed to what happened in Syria.

Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, China and Russia (the latter not being a direct neighbour but they would lend a helping hand), plus local Tajik forces close to Iran, Hazaras including Fatemiyoun and the Taliban all could and should join hands to crush "I"SIS.

The only local players I could see secretly facilitating the criminal actions of "I"SIS would be NATO collaborators (including possible infiltrators within the Taliban).

- - - - -

Not sure who is responsible yet, could be ISIS-K, could be but unlikely to be Taliban involvement.

Why? "I"SIS claimed responsibility and the Taliban have no reason to bomb the airport right after they took power.

In fact, the cui bono question would rather point to the US regime / deep state and its NATO vassals as hypothetical additional culprits. Washington would be likely to seek to destabilize Afghanistan to put pressure on Iran and China, and also Pakistan. After occupying Afghanistan for 20 years, the US regime will remain inactive while watching its main opponents, that is Iran, China and Russia, build constructive and mutually beneficial ties with Afghanistan. I wouldn't dwell too much on the killed American soldiers in this regard, to the US deep state and ruling oligarchy the lives of their own troops (limited numbers at that) are surely expendable in pursuit of their imperial goals.

- - - - -

Rest in peace to the innocent people. Occupiers deserve death.

I wonder who will be hit now? They are talking about some imaginary ISIS-K version.

Imaginary in what sense? Because it's been some time since this grouplet made its appearance. It recruits mostly from foreign terrorists present in Afghanistan (Uzbeks, Uyghurs etc) and radical factions of the Taliban which broke with the movement and turned their guns on it. Reinforcement by some terrorists from the Syrian and Iraqi theaters flown in by NATO is a possibility.

- - - - -

Or let Talibs take care of them, as they're the same thing as them or Afghanistan is too much of a mess for anyone to get involved with

The Taliban can be helped without sending any boots on the ground. Through intelligence, logistics, arms, training, cross-border drone and missile strikes against "I"SIS, and so on.
 
Last edited:
.
Nukes don't penetrate rock much.

300 nukes will badly maul Iran sure, but not sufficiently to stop it from launching 5 nukes on Israel, and that's already MAD.

Also with advanced centrifuges: Who knows, there might be harder sites than Fordow, if not now, then in near future.

Against any other nuclear power this concept would not work, it just works against Israel, because its so small, flat and surrounded by enemies.

5 shots
Bro you mad stupid if you think nukes won't stop Iran from launching nukes it doesn't have,
And even more retarded if you think nukes don't penetrate rock


Whatever nuclear site you have, we know of it and we can destroy it, with many means.

5 shots you don't have, and will get nuked before you will.

Stop thinking your nation, or any nation that will act against us, will survive in such a war.
 
.
Israel will never let Iran get nukes, even if it means nuking Iran in order to prevent that. I assure you that.
After Gaza almost fully disabled your weak azz country, i suggest you do whats wise and sharrap! :laughcry:
Israels problem is that 4-5 nukes are sufficient to effectively lead it to collapse.
4-5 nukes???? For this WEAK BICH country that almost collapsed from 4,000 crude Gaza rockets that knocked their lights out???? Please retract your compliment if possible:p:
 
.
After Gaza almost fully disabled your weak azz country, i suggest you do whats wise and sharrap! :laughcry:

4-5 nukes???? For this WEAK BICH country that almost collapsed from 4,000 crude Gaza rockets that knocked their lights out???? Please retract your compliment if possible:p:
lmao Gaza did nothing and is in ruins
 
.
Nuking Iran would cease Iran from existing, it won't be able to create any nukes.
And the world will make ISrael ALSO cease from existing, because ISrael doesnt have any authority from any world body to do such a taboo action. You have an itch to genocide because it happened to your country?

Hell, even a "small" explosion (relative to a nuke) in Beirut sent the whole country into chaos and just wrecked the economy and overwhelmed the hospitals of Lebanon.
False equivalence- Iran is completely different from Lebanon so this illustration from LEbanon is and will prove to be irrelevant to Iran's sitaution. Iran is independent, LEbanon is a pseudo satellite nation with a weak sense of self, which is opposite of Iran for eg.


Your country is a poor place for poor unfortunate people, a lot of which hate the government to death.
YOur country would be too if not for all the extra $$ US gives you, and after that Gaza war you just lost, your own people are poor, cuz their SECURITY POOR. 70% of country remained in bunkers for 11 days during the last war and majority of YOUR citizens want to exit the country due to poor safety- is that not poverty? you think thats actual wealth because it didnt happen to a "Brown country"? you try to sound smart but you say dum sht frequently.
Funny thing is you support your native country of Iran, from a place like Canada which is opposite to Iran in nature and ideology.
Mind your business, dont Jews all over the world support genocidal Israel?
lmao Gaza did nothing and is in ruins
-- Signed, the lying IDF.
 
Last edited:
.
@PeeD and all iranian and Iranian friends...statements from this Israeli fellow is indeed a good window into their thinking of the people there...he is generally reflecting the views of his society and should be an eye opener for all Iranians ..if you live in iran please make sure the planners and thinkers of iran are well aware of this level of thinking..never underestimate the brutality of your enemy..specially this one..
 
.
Bro you mad stupid if you think nukes won't stop Iran from launching nukes it doesn't have,
And even more retarded if you think nukes don't penetrate rock


Whatever nuclear site you have, we know of it and we can destroy it, with many means.

5 shots you don't have, and will get nuked before you will.

Stop thinking your nation, or any nation that will act against us, will survive in such a war.

Let it sink in.

Israels only option is nukes and nukes will result in nuclear counter-attack.

As simple
 
.
Nukes don't penetrate rock much.

300 nukes will badly maul Iran sure, but not sufficiently to stop it from launching 5 nukes on Israel, and that's already MAD.

Also with advanced centrifuges: Who knows, there might be harder sites than Fordow, if not now, then in near future.

Against any other nuclear power this concept would not work, it just works against Israel, because its so small, flat and surrounded by enemies.

5 shots
Some consideration should also be put into the true number of operational nuclear warheads. The real number is much lower than 300.
@PeeD and all iranian and Iranian friends...statements from this Israeli fellow is indeed a good window into their thinking of the people there...he is generally reflecting the views of his society and should be an eye opener for all Iranians ..if you live in iran please make sure the planners and thinkers of iran are well aware of this level of thinking..never underestimate the brutality of your enemy..specially this one..
Indeed, his manner of speech and thinking is precisely what justifies why Iran must retain hot nuclear weapons capability within a short week.

As the Zio David Albright said (paraphrasing), "Iran doesn't have a latent i.e. 6 month nuclear capability, they have a hot ready-to-go capability should they need it".
1630093016254.png


Any deal that would compromise this cannot be accepted.
 
Last edited:
.
Israel will never let Iran get nukes, even if it means nuking Iran in order to prevent that. I assure you that.

Your country is pea-sized and can be crossed in a 5 minute helicopter ride. Wouldn't even need nukes to deal with Israel to cause mass infrastructure collapse. World will abandon you due to optics if you ever used nukes so your future would be that of a starving pariah state, like Grozny, probably worse tbh.
 
.
Let it sink in.

Israels only option is nukes and nukes will result in nuclear counter-attack.

As simple
Fully agree.

Level of Israel's ACTUAL PROPENSITY To use a nuke in a real conflict? 0!

Any country other than US or RUssia or China that uses a nuke today, especially FIRST, is already a historic nation, and if we go based on nuclear use history, this our buddy here @Beny Karachun is only telling us his feelings and wishes. Reality says ISrael will never use a nuke.....and thats partly why entities arent deterred already to attack Israel- because ISrael's nukes are there for show and to assure that insecure small country "it will be alright".
 
.
@PeeD and all iranian and Iranian friends...statements from this Israeli fellow is indeed a good window into their thinking of the people there...he is generally reflecting the views of his society and should be an eye opener for all Iranians ..if you live in iran please make sure the planners and thinkers of iran are well aware of this level of thinking..never underestimate the brutality of your enemy..specially this one..

Oh, decision makers in Iran are fully aware. There are just two problems: the segment of Iranian society brainwashed by foreign propaganda (Farsi-language internet content and satellite broadcasters). As well as liberal defeatists within the system (reformists & centrists/moderates) who, while knowing the above, prefer to capitulate and kneel rather than stand up to and keep resisting these oppressors.
 
.
You're very wrong. Iran is definitely not in a state it could build a nuke if it wants to. It'll never reach that stage.

Iran cannot receive hundreds of nukes, it only took two to bring down Japan which was a military and an economical powerhouse. A nuclear strike would destroy all of Iran's government, commanders, pretty much all of its logistical capabilities, the whole electric grid. The whole country would be in chaos.

Besides, you think Iranian nuclear sites won't be the main target of a nuclear strike? That's the first thing that Israel wants to prevent.
Dont take this the wrong way, but you are beginning to sound just like @500
 
.
Back
Top Bottom