What's new

Iranian BMs were launched at Ain Assad: Fars News

. .
If Iran didn't want to kill anyone, they wouldn't have launched any attacks.


Liquid?

Wrong. Like I said, let's wait to see if the bases were actually hit or not. If yes, then obviously the soldiers etc would have evacuated.
 
.
Everyone on this board knows I am non bias. I criticize Iran and I criticize US.

This attack was a complete failure based on the words of IRGC.

“attack will be strategic, not emotional, it will be long lasting, etc we will not attack for sake of saying we attacked”

list goes on.

This attack was nothing but emotional and non strategic.

Clearly the Iranian government wants to avoid war and a punishing counter response.

I need to see why these missiles missed if it was intentional or US based tech (jamming, interceptors, etc) or a mixture of both.
 
. .
Does anyone know what the blast range is for the missiles fired?
 
. . . . .
Everyone on this board knows I am non bias. I criticize Iran and I criticize US.

This attack was a complete failure based on the words of IRGC.

“attack will be strategic, not emotional, it will be long lasting, etc we will not attack for sake of saying we attacked”

list goes on.

This attack was nothing but emotional and non strategic.

Clearly the Iranian government wants to avoid war and a punishing counter response.

I need to see why these missiles missed if it was intentional or US based tech (jamming, interceptors, etc) or a mixture of both.

dude, who gives a toss if americans died (better if not), Iran just targeted US bases, you call that complete failure?
 
. . .
Everyone on this board knows I am non bias. I criticize Iran and I criticize US.

This attack was a complete failure based on the words of IRGC.

“attack will be strategic, not emotional, it will be long lasting, etc we will not attack for sake of saying we attacked”

list goes on.

This attack was nothing but emotional and non strategic.

Clearly the Iranian government wants to avoid war and a punishing counter response.

I need to see why these missiles missed if it was intentional or US based tech (jamming, interceptors, etc) or a mixture of both.
No, this was a calculated strike, to show Trump he's looking at war. At the same time they have provided Trump an off ramp if he doesn't get played again by Iran hater number 1-Zionist agent Mr. Pompeo....this a strategic master stroke if it works out.
 
.
You are just trying to see it from the opposite perspective.

Iran has attacked US bases. Even if they were empty and only Iraqi soldiers died, the US, if truly wants war with Iran, can use this as perfect casus belli to attack Iran and hit Tehran. If the US doesn't want war with Iran, then there must be some sort of deterrence preventing them from this. So, your argument that Iran has lost its deterrence holds no merit.
Americans will choose the time of the war themselves. Just because they didn't attack you today doesn't change anything.
Look at this from their perspective. Try for a moment. They succesfully destroyed a very important Iranian General and what did they have lost? Why would they see it as casus belli? Just because of Some buildings?
If there is no American casualties, tomorrow Trump will say ''There is no dead americans so there is no war! But Iran be careful!'' And your leaders will say ''We got our revenge!''
And in the end of the day it is 1-0. One top Iranian general versus nothing..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom