What's new

Iran won’t be allowed to have nukes, US assures Gulf states

.
BBC NEWS | Europe | CIA 'let atomic expert Khan go'

There, simple google search. You do the rest.



Ok thanks..
Did you even read the article you yourself posted? According to what it says the CIA messed up. They weren't protecting him but rather wanted to go after his contacts too. This was a mistake on their part as he soon left the country and the trail went cold.
According to Mr Lubbers, US intelligence wanted to find out more about Mr Khan's contacts while he was working as an engineer at the top secret Dutch uranium enrichment plant at Almelo.

"The Americans wished to follow and watch Khan to get more information," he told Dutch radio.

Where does it say:
Dude, the US GAVE you nukes. From frigging Dutch labs nonetheless.
That USA 'gave' us the nukes. It's simple incompetence. Just as CIA ended up giving nuclear information to Iran when their plan was to give erroneous information, irani's figured out the mistakes on their own.
 
.
Did you even read the article you yourself posted? According to what it says the CIA messed up. They weren't protecting him but rather wanted to go after his contacts too. This was a mistake on their part as he soon left the country and the trail went cold.
According to Mr Lubbers, US intelligence wanted to find out more about Mr Khan's contacts while he was working as an engineer at the top secret Dutch uranium enrichment plant at Almelo.

"The Americans wished to follow and watch Khan to get more information," he told Dutch radio.

Where does it say:

That USA 'gave' us the nukes. It's simple incompetence. Just as CIA ended up giving nuclear information to Iran when their plan was to give erroneous information, irani's figured out the mistakes on their own.

Yeah sure. So the CIA actively follows Pakistan's top nuclear scientist and spy, all the while knowing that Pakistan wants NUKES, but they just think 'hey, let's go after his suppliers'. Very logical. This was a tactical move for plausible deniability. The US wanted Pakistan to have nukes, and to control them later on, while forever having a thorn in India's side. Which will be one of 2 upcoming hyperpowers along with China.
 
.
Yeah sure. So the CIA actively follows Pakistan's top nuclear scientist and spy, all the while knowing that Pakistan wants NUKES, but they just think 'hey, let's go after his suppliers'. Very logical. This was a tactical move for plausible deniability. The US wanted Pakistan to have nukes, and to control them later on, while forever having a thorn in India's side. Which will be one of 2 upcoming hyperpowers along with China.
So in the end you provided no reference and ended up giving your own opinion. For reference you gave an article which did not back up your claim. CIA is not some super smart powerful agency, They can be incompetent at times too.
but they just think 'hey, let's go after his suppliers'.
Nowhere does it say "suppliers". They wanted to go after ISI network that recruited Khan in the first place. An understandable SOP.
Did the CIA give Iran the bomb? Extracts from New York Times reporter James Risen's new book | Environment | The Guardian
Oh no. CIA conspiracy. They wanted to give Iran bomb all along to keep in check hyperpower Israel and Russia and to keep Arab countries under their influence.zzzzzzzzzzzz
 
Last edited:
. .
So in the end you provided no reference and ended up giving your own opinion. For reference you gave an article which did not back up your claim. CIA is not some super smart powerful agency, They can be incompetent at times too.

Nowhere does it say "suppliers". They wanted to go after ISI network that recruited Khan in the first place. An understandable SOP.
Did the CIA give Iran the bomb? Extracts from New York Times reporter James Risen's new book | Environment | The Guardian
Oh no. CIA conspiracy. They wanted to give Iran bomb all along to keep in check hyperpower Israel and Russia and to keep Arab countries under their influence.zzzzzzzzzzzz

Hyperpower Israel? Are you delusional? And 'wanted to give Iran the bomb'? Then wtf doesn't iran have nukes yet? Or suffered over 30 years of sanctions?
 
. .
Hyperpower Israel? Are you delusional? And 'wanted to give Iran the bomb'? Then wtf doesn't iran have nukes yet? Or suffered over 30 years of sanctions?
I was being sarcastic. Your statement sounded just as crazy as what i said. US gave Pakistan the nukes... that will be the day lol. Basically since CIA failed to predict AQK's moves, it helped Pakistan.
 
.
they will have their own Nuke Weapons thanks to yankee sissy Boys :angry:

and we will Nuke USA and Europe if they will try to Stop IRAN

Just like the U.S.S.R once threatened to nuke your China?? It was ironically the U.S(who you so hate) that deterred/warned the Russians of consequences if they went on with their devilish nuclear holocaust plans. So you should be thanking the 'evil' U.S instead. So much for red comrades.:lol::chilli:

USSR planned nuclear attack on China in 1969 - Telegraph
Nixon intervention saved China from Soviet nuclear attack | Think Positive
Sino-Soviet-US Relations and the 1969 Nuclear Threat | Foreign Policy Journal

:pop:
 
Last edited:
.
i don't Believe in western conspiracy theories.

we Asian Brothers will Nuke Evil USA and UK to Death.

Viva Strong Asia, Death to America ! :china:
Russia.gif


Bow Down to Mighty Soviet Mother Russia and Save your Country English Man !
Russia.gif

Are you sure you are not superboy??:what::rolleyes::eek:

:lol:
 
.
I was being sarcastic. Your statement sounded just as crazy as what i said. US gave Pakistan the nukes... that will be the day lol. Basically since CIA failed to predict AQK's moves, it helped Pakistan.

You know, I'm not totally sure about the CIA's intentions and can't prove it. So I'll let you have this one. Sinister a-holes those Yanks. So let's agree to agree on your point. Either intention led to Pakistan having nukes, and that's a reality.
 
.
I wouldn't trust Iran with fireworks.

A crazy regime.
 
.
You know, I'm not totally sure about the CIA's intentions and can't prove it. So I'll let you have this one. Sinister a-holes those Yanks. So let's agree to agree on your point. Either intention led to Pakistan having nukes, and that's a reality.

beeing sinister means nothing, if you have not the guts to take real action against your enemies.

western yankees and their british masters are so much used to hide and work with manipulation, that they are simply helpless infront of pure and massive violence brutality and power of their enemies.

casus belli is needed so this dumb world can go for good.

this world needs to REST IN PIECEes
 
.
you did not retaliate to chemical attacks of saddam because noone accepted to sell you chemical weapons.

mulla mulla


Mr Smarter , Iran did have capability to use CW but we didn't ....the point is who gave Saddam CW to kill Iranian and Iraqi civilians ,,,
bear bear ....
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom