What's new

Iran vs. Saudi Arabia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but considering the statements of intent that have consistently been coming out of SA in the past few years, it'd be more natural to assume the above conflict in the context of SA taking on Iran. And in that case, I think your airforce will have very little chance of success. Your planes will be shot down by Iranian air defence or f-14s. And those who make it back may find that their bases no longer have suitable runways for landing (that's were those missiles come in). And I don't think there's any need to get into the land or naval war. I think the results will be lopsided there.

The AirForce in case of war will carry out SEAD missions. We have been practicing SEAD a lot with many countries most notably red flag. And Anatolian eagle.

Our navy has state of the art stealth frigates built on our requirement specifications which can carry out the jobs of destroyers including air defense land attack missiles, helicopters not to mention anti ship capabilities and stealth configuration and we have 8 of such frigates.

You are extremely underestimating their ballistic missile tech.

Civilians? Infrastructure? That's what amateurs assume. Say, in case of a war between US and Russia, will Russia target US cities at first? No, Russia will target the US military at first. After taking out military capability, there is no need to take our population centres, they will easily surrender or they can then be targeted.

Similarly, Iran would target the Saudi military targets, oil refineries, ports and financial centres (like central bank) rather than civilian infrastructure. Maybe some tall buildings will be targeted, but thats it. The priority at first would be to destroy military targets, not civilian. Any sensible military general would attest to this.



Saudi does, they are mainly imported from China, and their missile bases are concentrated rather than dispersed. However, they are nowhere as large quantity as that Iran possesses and mass produces regularly.



Yes indeed, but the philosophy behind creating this topic was that I see Saudi members regularly threatening to "destroy Iran". This topic should be a good comparison at who can destroy what.

Isn't Iran the one threatening to destroy us?? Be sure that will only happen in Iranian and yours wet dreams.
 
.
In conventional war wins one who dominates the skies. KSA has the ovewhelming advantage in aircrfafts over Iran. Thus on paper KSA has advantage. However advantage on paper not always transforms into actual.
 
.
In conventional war wins one who dominates the skies. KSA has the ovewhelming advantage in aircrfafts over Iran. Thus on paper KSA has advantage. However advantage on paper not always transforms into actual.

Yep didn't Arabs have overwhelming odds against Israel?? Manpower?? Money??:rofl:
 
.
The AirForce in case of war will carry out SEAD missions. We have been practicing SEAD a lot with many countries most notably red flag. And Anatolian eagle.

Our navy has state of the art stealth frigates built on our requirement specifications which can carry out the jobs of destroyers including air defense land attack missiles, helicopters not to mention anti ship capabilities and stealth configuration and we have 8 of such frigates.



Isn't Iran the one threatening to destroy us?? Be sure that will only happen in Iranian and yours wet dreams.

Just bring one proof that Iran ever has threatened to destroy you.Iran doesn't count Arab countries as it's military rivals.we don't have any intention fighting with you guys.But you just jump in the middle and scream:Hey,look,we are here too.We are standing against Iran.
 
.
T

Isn't Iran the one threatening to destroy us?? Be sure that will only happen in Iranian and yours wet dreams.

No I do not think they are. I think they would accommodate you provided you were not virulently anti Iran, btw Any Muslim country that sides or relies on America loses the moral ground to speak for Muslims
 
.
Just bring one proof that Iran ever has threatened to destroy you.Iran doesn't count Arab countries as it's military rivals.we don't have any intention fighting with you guys.But you just jump in the middle and scream:Hey,look,we are here too.We are standing against Iran.

When your clerics and military chiefs keep saying that they will wipe out Dubai off the map then it's personal. And we have brought the proof here a hundred times mainly Al-Bhati did that. Not to mention the vast majority of your missiles are aimed at our population centers to kill as many of us as possible we will simply not stand still at that.
 
.
Yes, but considering the statements of intent that have consistently been coming out of SA in the past few years, it'd be more natural to assume the above conflict in the context of SA taking on Iran. And in that case, I think your airforce will have very little chance of success. Your planes will be shot down by Iranian air defence or f-14s. And those who make it back may find that their bases no longer have suitable runways for landing (that's were those missiles come in). And I don't think there's any need to get into the land or naval war. I think the results will be lopsided there.


… Your planes will be shot down by Grumman F-14s Tomcat…



Really? It's just funny ^ ^


MBDA Meteor Promo - YouTube

BAE Systems Meteor missile testing - YouTube



MBDA Meteor


Type: Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile

Warhead : High Explosive Blast-Fragmentation

Detonation mechanism: Proximity/Impact

Engine: Throttleable ducted rocket

Operational range: 100+ km (60+ mi)

Speed: over Mach 4

Guidance system: Inertial Mid-course with Datalinked Updates, Active Radar















...
 
.
Yep didn't Arabs have overwhelming odds against Israel?? Manpower?? Money??:rofl:

Actually Israel's only advantage was the air. And we all saw how that turned out.

Really? It's just funny ^ ^


MBDA Meteor Promo - YouTube

BAE Systems Meteor missile testing - YouTube



MBDA Meteor


Type: Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile

Warhead : High Explosive Blast-Fragmentation

Detonation mechanism: Proximity/Impact

Engine: Throttleable ducted rocket

Operational range: 100+ km (60+ mi)

Speed: over Mach 4

Guidance system: Inertial Mid-course with Datalinked Updates, Active Radar















...

You dont get it crisis?? They will win due to their superior race man. :rofl:
 
.
When your clerics and military chiefs keep saying that they will wipe out Dubai off the map then it's personal. And we have brought the proof here a hundred times mainly Al-Bhati did that. Not to mention the vast majority of your missiles are aimed at our population centers to kill as many of us as possible we will simply not stand still at that.

Where the hell did you get these lies from?Have you visited our missile sites and saw the direction they are aimed at?

When did Iran say we will destroy Dubai?
Whatever news sources you are using,it's obvious that its a total pure crap.Get your facts right.
Iran's foreign minister is saying everyday that Arabs are our brothers.He shouldn't repeat this lie.because your brother never sides with your enemy,never backstabs you.
 
.
I read that when the Iranian President was questioned about the wikileaks news that Sauds want Tehran nuked. he dismissed it as an American propaganda to cause issues between Muslim nations
 
.
I read that when the Iranian President was questioned about the wikileaks news that Sauds want Tehran nuked. he dismissed it as an American propaganda to cause issues between Muslim nations

King Abdullah never ever ever said to nuke Iran. Why are you lying Aryan_B?? Tell me why are you lying??
 
.
King Abdullah never ever ever said to nuke Iran. Why are you lying Aryan_B?? Tell me why are you lying??

Bro, calm down, he's referring to the Wikileaks!
 
. .
Ahmadinejad blames U.S. 'mischief' for WikiLeaks dump and insists Arab nations are Iran's friends

By Ian Drury
UPDATED: 08:19, 30 November 2010


Documents show Saudi Arabia 'frequently exhorted' U.S. to attack 'snake' Iran
Documents also detail Pakistan nuclear fears
Cables highlight concerns over Karzai and his brother

Iran's president dismissed reports that Arab leaders wanted the U.S. to attack his country and insisted the neighboring countries were all friends.

At a Monday press conference President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called the latest WikiLeaks document dump of diplomatic memos a waste of time engineered by the U.S. government to cause 'mischief'.

According to the memos, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia repeatedly urged the United States to attack Iran, destroy its nuclear programme and stop Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon.
Ahmadinejad spoke out against the WikiLeaks revelations of Arab hostility to Iran even though he said the documents are 'so worthless that it isn't worth someone referring to them or wasting time to refer to them'


Ahmadinejad spoke out against the WikiLeaks revelations of Arab hostility to Iran even though he said the documents are 'so worthless that it isn't worth someone referring to them or wasting time to refer to them'

'We don't give any value to these documents,' Ahmadinejad told the news conference.

'It's without legal value. Iran and regional states are friends. Such acts of mischief have no impact on relations between nations.'

Ahmadinejad alleged the leaks were an 'organized' effort by the U.S. to stir trouble between Iran and Arab neighbors
.

'We don't think this information was leaked. We think it was organised to be released on a regular basis and they are pursuing political goals.'


Ahmadinejad accused the American government of pursuing a strategy resembling 'an intelligence and psychological war game.'

'Nations are aware. Such a game will have no effect. It's so worthless that it isn't worth someone referring to them or wasting time to refer to them.'

But according to the leaked documents, Saudi Arabia 'frequently exhorted' Washington to launch an air strike against the regime in Tehran.

In a report of a 2008 meeting with U.S. General David Petraeus, the Saudi ambassador to Washington said King Abdullah wanted the White House 'to cut the head off the snake' before Iran developed nuclear weapons and threatened its neighbours in the Middle East.
The Saudi king has urged American to launch airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities

The secret document revealed that the Saudis demanded 'severe U.S. and international sanctions on Iran, including a travel ban and further restrictions on bank lending'.

It added that 'the use of military pressure against Iran should not be ruled out'.

King Abdullah was backed by the King of Bahrain who warned in a cable: 'The danger of letting it go on is greater than the danger of stopping it.'

And the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammad bin Zayed, told the U.S. that he believed that Iran's tyrannical President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was 'going to take us to war'.

Leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt referred to Iran 'as 'evil,' an 'existential threat' and a power that 'is going to take us to war,'' the Guardian said.

Those documents may prove the most problematic because even though the concerns of the Gulf Arab states are known, their leaders rarely offer such stark appraisals in public.

The revelations will reverberate around the world and are likely to ratchet up tension in the Middle East.
The statements will bolster the case of Israeli and U.S. hawks who believe an attack against Iran will be necessary during the near future.

But they will also provoke President Ahmadinejad - referred to in one missive as 'Hitler' - to press on with his nuclear programme.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed earlier this year that Iran had produced its first small batch of higher-grade enriched uranium - stoking fears it was secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons capacity.

Iran is not the only country in the Middle East to be mentioned in the diplomatic cables.

They also detail a dangerous stand-off with Pakistan over nuclear fuel.

The New York Times reported that the U.S. has mounted a highly secret - and so far unsuccessful - effort to take enriched uranium out of a Pakistani research reactor for fears it could be used for a nuclear bomb.

In May, 2009, U.S. Ambassador Anne Patterson said Pakistan was refusing to schedule a visit by American experts.

She said a Pakistani official had claimed that if the local media discovered the fuel removal, 'they would certainly portray it as the United States taking Pakistan's nuclear weapons'.


Read more: WikiLeaks: Ahmadinejad blames US for leaks insists Arab nations are Iran's friends | Mail Online
 
.
Actually he is not a stranger to lying so it was to be expected really.

We really need to go back to the peace thread. You guys are again going over-the-belt!

Enough of this KSA vs Iran now.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom