'Iran ready to send peacekeepers to UK'

[superNova]

Ever thought about what will happen to the world, if Iran makes a nuke and ends up dropping it on Israel?

well israel already has it and israel has already went offensive against other middle east countries like iraq, so i think israel is crazier enough to try such adventure first and nukes to iran will only serve as a counter balance force, because if alone for israel, entire middle will be more prone to such disasters

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Ever thought about what will happen to the world, if Iran makes a nuke and ends up dropping it on Israel?

Replace the word "Iran"... with America, China, Russia, Pakistan, India, or Israel...

Ever wonder what would happen, if one of these powers dropped two nuclear weapons on two separate population centers?

 

[Roybot]

well israel already has it and israel has already went offensive against other middle east countries like iraq, so i think israel is crazier enough to try such adventure first and nukes to iran will only serve as a counter balance force, because if alone for israel, entire middle will be more prone to such disasters

Whats the guarantee that Iran won't do it? If am not wrong Ahmedinajad has already threatened Israel. Am not just thinking about Israel here. Think about the consequences of any such misadventure.

Replace the word "Iran"... with America, China, Russia, Pakistan, India, or Israel...

Ever wonder what would happen, if one of these powers dropped two nuclear weapons on two separate population centers?

None of the countries you mention are openly threatening to nuke another country.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

None of the countries you mention are openly threatening to nuke another country.

Firstly, one of the other countries on that list, has actually already used nuclear weapons against a civilian population.

Secondly, has Iran ever actually threatened to nuke Israel? I know about that "wipe off the map" quote, and I also know it was a mistranslation, that was directed at the regime and not the country itself.

I'm also quite sure that the supreme Ayatollah of Iran declared a religious Fatwa, that says the creation/use of nuclear weapons is forbidden by their interpretation of Islam.

 

[ZhengHe]

Whats the guarantee that Iran won't do it? If am not wrong Ahmedinajad has already threatened Israel. Am not just thinking about Israel here. Think about the consequences of any such misadventure.



None of the countries you mention are openly threatening to nuke another country.

No. But one of them actually did.

 

[superNova]

Whats the guarantee that Iran won't do it? If am not wrong Ahmedinajad has already threatened Israel. Am not just thinking about Israel here. Think about the consequences of any such misadventure.



None of the countries you mention are openly threatening to nuke another country.

america has already 'nuked' twice in japan

iran says that it will nuke israel, but iran knows if it nukes israel, israel also has nukes to retaliate, israel is dangerous enough for entire middle east, its not iran but israel who has fought with numerous middle east countries like syria, lebanon, egypt, palestine, iraq etc n has feuds with present turkey government, and iranian regime, israel has been unaccepted by numerous islamic and non islamic countries, iran doesnt have those features so decide for your self

 

[888jamie888]

The US was at war with Japan. It was arguably justified. If Iran's intentions are innocent then why don't they let inspectors into the country?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

The US was at war with Japan. It was arguably justified.

That doesn't make sense.

Does war justify the use of nuclear weapons on population centers?

And... what if Iran and Israel get into a war? Would it be justified then?

Wars happen all over the planet, all the time (several wars are ongoing right this moment)... yet only two nuclear weapons have ever been used on civilian populations.

 

[longbrained]

I am sure Iran is just mocking UK and US politicians by trying to show them their real faces. Kinda like holding up the mirror to them. I some times think it is good, Iran is doing it for us all. Lately UK and US have been very hypocritical ones. On a more serious note though, Euronews had interviewed Ahmadinejad just a week before the riots started in London and in that interview Ahmadinejad kinda predicts such a situation and comments on its causes.
Ahmadinejad – the full exclusive interview | euronews, world news

 

[gambit]

That doesn't make sense.

Does war justify the use of nuclear weapons on population centers?

And... what if Iran and Israel get into a war? Would it be justified then?

Wars happen all over the planet, all the time (several wars are ongoing right this moment)... yet only two nuclear weapons have ever been used on civilian populations.

What do YOU believe is appropriate justice for the atrocities Imperial Japan committed on Asia? Like Unit 731, for example.

 

[somebozo]

Iran sets a new standard in International trolling.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

What do YOU believe is appropriate justice for the atrocities Imperial Japan committed on Asia? Like Unit 731, for example.

I would be incredibly biased, due to the fact that my ancestors were the victims.

However, all the war criminals responsible for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army, were executed after WW2.

They are the ones who were guilty, and they paid for it. I don't condone innocent civilians being killed, and yes that includes the ones that have been killed by my own country.

 

[CardSharp]

What do YOU believe is appropriate justice for the atrocities Imperial Japan committed on Asia? Like Unit 731, for example.

I don't believe in punishing an entire nation, just specific criminals like those in Unit 731 who did biological weapons experiments on Chinese civilians and POWs.

Also interesting fact about unit 731, after the war, the USA gave immunity to the doctors who did the experiments in return for them starting the USA's own biological weapons program. (should pick your examples a little more carefully buddy)

 

[888jamie888]

That doesn't make sense.

Does war justify the use of nuclear weapons on population centers?

And... what if Iran and Israel get into a war? Would it be justified then?

Wars happen all over the planet, all the time (several wars are ongoing right this moment)... yet only two nuclear weapons have ever been used on civilian populations.

Again this is debatable. They say that by using nukes, the war ended much more quickly and so actually saved lives.
Supposedly nukes are more defensive than offensive as they act as a deterrent. So if Iran and Israel went to war I don't think nukes would be used.
If Iran suddenly decided to blow New York up, then that would in no way be justified
Also no nuclear powers are at war with one another.

 

[gambit]

I would be incredibly biased, due to the fact that my ancestors were the victims.

However, all the war criminals responsible for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army, were executed after WW2.

They are the ones who were guilty, and they paid for it.

I don't believe in punishing an entire nation, just specific criminals like those in Unit 731 who did biological weapons experiments on Chinese civilians and POWs.

Also interesting fact about unit 731, after the war, the USA gave immunity to the doctors who did the experiments in return for them starting the USA's own biological weapons program. (should pick your examples a little more carefully buddy)

What the US did with some people associated with that infamous military unit is not the issue. The question is whether a tactic of war is justified. So how were/are the atrocities committed against Asia justified?