What's new

IRAN Helps N.Korea in Missile tech !

.
kk sir ur just giving more reasons for other countries to attack ur nations. i am not against iran, but i am against iran spreading techs to dictator nations that can lead to dangerous situations.

due to such stupid acts why muslim countries today are sufferring.

nuclear and missile proliferation is not religious matter as i know sir jee. its matter of interest .all nations suck same milk from each others .

nc-12_clip_image002_0000.jpg
 
.
the day iran explodes a nuke it will get invaded or bombed. unfortunately thats the truth. i am not against iranian development, but iran cant change its destiny against a superpower. usa will not tolerate any country developing nukes now. imagine in nxt 10 yrs 30 countries have nuke and a war break out????
pakistan was able to get away after exploding nukes because india did it too and america was a frnd of pak at that time. iran is different. for usa iran is no different than iraq. u explode it ur going down...
 
. . . . .
for u guys its a toy but for bigger power its a threat to world.

same bigger powers shear it with us like lollypops .now it will never stopped .if they really interested in stopping it they do it from home first .100 nukes are enough for those bigger powers and they have tons and tons of them so why not us ? BTW what you mean us ? pakistan is nuclear power like india and same we are here talking abut iran NK .

why the hell they have this mess in first ?
bernstein-chart-051310__jpg_450x499_q85.jpg
 
.
the day iran explodes a nuke it will get invaded or bombed. unfortunately thats the truth. i am not against iranian development, but iran cant change its destiny against a superpower. usa will not tolerate any country developing nukes now. imagine in nxt 10 yrs 30 countries have nuke and a war break out????
pakistan was able to get away after exploding nukes because india did it too and america was a frnd of pak at that time. iran is different. for usa iran is no different than iraq. u explode it ur going down...

They Don't have Balls !

N =/= Q >>> IRAN =/= IRAQ :D
 
.
same bigger powers shear it with us like lollypops .now it will never stopped .if they really interested in stopping it they do it from home first .100 nukes are enough for those bigger powers and they have tons and tons of them so why not us ? BTW what you mean us ? pakistan is nuclear power like india and same we are here talking abut iran NK .

why the hell they have this mess in first ?
bernstein-chart-051310__jpg_450x499_q85.jpg

britain, france, russia, usa are traditonal powers. india and china are emerging or emerged powers. and isreal is a small power created by usa for its security.

muslim nations are sufffering nations with terrorism and coups and nk is country run by morons and crazy leftist leaders. we saw what happened last year in libya, egypt and in pakistan in 2008. they are not fit to have weapons right now. as i said americans will not tolerate any muslim country with weapons. pakistan has weapons and now they are bombing ur nation everyday looking for reasons to fully attack pakistan.

They Don't have Balls !

N =/= Q >>> IRAN =/= IRAQ :D

to be honest they dont need balls to attack iran. isreal alone is enough for iran...
 
. .
britain, france, russia, usa are traditonal powers. india and china are emerging or emerged powers. and isreal is a small power created by usa for its security.

muslim nations are sufffering nations with terrorism and coups and nk is country run by morons and crazy leftist leaders. we saw what happened last year in libya, egypt and in pakistan in 2008. they are not fit to have weapons right now. as i said americans will not tolerate any muslim country with weapons. pakistan has weapons and now they are bombing ur nation everyday looking for reasons to fully attack pakistan.



to be honest they dont need balls to attack iran. isreal alone is enough for iran...

i got your point there is nothing more to debate with you we are rouge in other words but we will keep nukes as we keeping them since 1984
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom