Iran fires missiles into Indian Ocean

[Ahmad Abdullah Ravian]

assalam alaikum

Brother don't let ppl drag u on every thread and make it saudies vs all muslims
For all of those who wants to share oil money with saudies first tell me before suadies get the oil and these places were in very bad conditions did these ppl share thier wealth with the ppl of saudia?
TARIQ

You are right Buddy , Selfless Brotherly relations among Muslims should be Exercised In this Forum and Everywhere else

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Yeah I admit I do not know how to make a nuke but that does not make me ignorant about what a nuke can and can not do. And I also admit it is going to be costly.

And your reference that we can not operate an airport tower speaks volumes of your views. Iran is the one that is considering KSA an enemy and so in return we have no choice but to look at you with wary eyes. And no Iran is still no threat to the USA. Maybe a threat to KSA but not USA.

And by admitting that Iran has sleeper cells in the Arab world you just confirmed that it is up to no good for the Arab world. But rest assured unless Iran backs away from its intent of creating "Persia: The Home Coming" and trying to sell it to the common man as Islamic its entire neighbors are going to look at Iran as a threat to their security.

Could you provide evidence that iran thinks your a enemy?
iran has not beef with you pal but if you try and attack us or help our enemy (usa) then how do you think iran will view you?
besides iran main enemy is the usa/uk righ now.

its in your interest and irans interest than we dont carry on this fight because whats it gonna do for us? our people dont want beef with each other its only the stupid goverments.

 

[B@KH]

You need some serious reality check.
US has succeeded in Iraq; (1) removed Saddam from power and eliminated him, (2) tolerated Iraqi resistance, (3) installed a friendly government, (4) ensured that USD would remain the preferred reserve currency of Iraq, and (5) has plans for keeping some permanent military bases over there just like in Japan and Germany. In this manner, US can keep an eye on other players in the Middle-East.
The afghan conflict will continue till 2014. We will see what happens till that time. US is making a smart move by giving Taliban a representation in Afghan government. However, Al-qaeda network is in bad shape. and OBL is gone. So situation is not very hopeless.
Every nation is different from the other. I see no logic in these kinds of statements.

i agree to most.

usa invaded iraq to prevent an Islamic revolution in Iraq and this target it has already achieved. there was no other immediate reason for iraq invasion. Saddam was the rotten puppet and a risk and hence was removed. military bases, encirclement of iran, oil, etc. were secondary reasons. Taliban/alqaida are a new religion usa is imposing in this region and will continue to survive till usa exists in this region and after its withdrawal terrorists will be routed out by the people.

The encirclement of iran is now complete and usa is now preparing for a final assualt on iran using all of its allies and it even wants pak to shift its ballistic missles towards iran.

Taliban is a different kind of force. It has ideological rootes in the Afghan society. And Taliban has deep knowledge of Afghan territory. These advantages cannot be easily negated.

currently due to opposition to usa taliban are getting some support from people. once usa leaves the region then taliban era will be over. earlier too taliban failed to achieve support from masses and their survival depended on support from pakistan' isi. mainly pushtoons supported taliban while others rejected them.

Iran is idelogically better prepared than others for its defence and have better understanding of their landscape than others.

Iran mainly faced Iraqi military of the 1980s in combat during the Iran-Iraq war. However, Iraqi military showed better performance then Iranian military. It was the famed human wave tactics that worked in Iranian favor. Iranian bravey is certainly commendable. Unfortunately, huge number of muslims perished in that war and all that blood was lost in vain as the war resulted in a stalemate. Iran also briefly faced US military in combat during that war; Operation Praying Mantis It seems as if Iran wanted to test US capabilities and the move seriously backfired. The OPM played a role in forcing Iran on the negotiation table with Iraq to end the war.

The best weapons that iranians had was the RPGs. iranian youths fought iraqis with RPGs. infact iran's army was ill-equipped as compared to iraqis. while iran's more focus was to preserve its strategic and critical assets. it tried to keep its airforce, navy and air defence infact. One of the pakistani brigadier who visited Iran during the second year of war was surprised to know that Iran didn;t used HAWK missles against iraqi fighter jets attacking iranian cities. He was told that these systems will only be used in case of attacks by the american airforce and hence they are keeping it safe.

Iran used war to achieve the following:

1. buildup and training of its military
2. self sufficiency
3. organizing iraqis for an islamic revolution

If there was no american involvement then for sure the war would have continued for few more years and would have ended in an Islamic revolution in Iraq. infact the main purpose of the usa invasion of Iraq was to zerorize the iranian investment in iraq and kill all possibilites of islamic revolution. The speeches of Imam Khomeini and Khamenei are very important and reveals the actual reason of usa invasion while the world only knows about a fake pretext of WMD. "......If saddam is given a chance he will attack again and will even attack others...."

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Thomas
Yeah whetever then why dont you go ahead attack iran and get rid of the mullas? you been saying your gonna attack for years so when is it gonna happen? those mullas need to be destroyed. your threats are getting boring tbh.

 

[BelligerentPacifist]

^My thanks in appreciation for the first person on the forum to have spelled mulla correctly i.e. without an h!

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

^My thanks in appreciation for the first person on the forum to have spelled mulla correctly i.e. without an h!

Hhahaha lol no worries

 

[salvage]

Well done Iran,,,you are welcome in indian ocean anytime and for anything

 

[salvage]

Iranians are truly living in looney world. Don't they know that ACs never travel alone but with an armada of warships and submarines. Whoever made this cheesy comments should be fired for lack of clarity of thought.

what will the armada of ships and submarines do to prevent a ballistic missile falling from the sky towards carrier at supersonic speed??and what if they fired 10,15 of them simultaneously....most sophisticated of anti-missile technology would shyt within and jam under such scenario

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

what will the armada of ships and submarines do to prevent a ballistic missile falling from the sky towards carrier at supersonic speed??and what if they fired 10,15 of them simultaneously....most sophisticated of anti-missile technology would shyt within and jam under such scenario

apparantly americans can stop anything and their air defense will stop iranian missiles. thats what they say until the missiles rain on them. and their system fail then they say it was because it was 'turned off'' or some excuse like that.

 

[harpoon]

what will the armada of ships and submarines do to prevent a ballistic missile falling from the sky towards carrier at supersonic speed??and what if they fired 10,15 of them simultaneously....most sophisticated of anti-missile technology would shyt within and jam under such scenario

Ballastic missiles against Warships- you must be joking. What next ant-ship missiles against aircrafts?

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Ballastic missiles against Warships- you must be joking. What next ant-ship missiles against aircrafts?

why is it a joke?

in theory even a bullet can destory a fighter jet whilst flying, so tell me what wrong about using a BM against a ship.
have you not heard of anti-ship ballastic missile for example?

 

[Mosamania]

why is it a joke?

Ballistic missiles do not work against surface warships unless they have a few meter accuracy and even then it wont hit if the surface warships are moving.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Ballistic missiles do not work against surface warships unless they have a few meter accuracy and even then it wont hit if the surface warships are moving.

Iran has not even showed any evidence about the test so i dont see how people say it was used to hit a war ship. also iran does have an anti ship BM called persian gulf. but i think this test if it happened was an accuracy test for their missiles rather than a range thing.

 

[Mosamania]

Iran has not even showed any evidence about the test so i dont see how people say it was used to hit a war ship. also iran does have an anti ship BM called persian gulf. but i think this test if it happened was an accuracy test for their missiles rather than a range thing.

I am not talking about this test buddy. And almost all countries test their missiles in international waters. And an aircraft carrier is an Armada and nuclear weapons if you fire missiles and sink the carrier nuclear submarines gonna fire. So it is not as easy as you might think.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

I am not talking about this test buddy. And almost all countries test their missiles in international waters. And an aircraft carrier is an Armada and nuclear weapons if you fire missiles and sink the carrier nuclear submarines gonna fire. So it is not as easy as you might think.

I do apologize, my knowledge on these thing is very limited i merely just like to see new military equipment being unveiled, but i neither know alot about them or want them to be used against anyone.