What's new

Iran directly enters to the warr against Israel's genocide

This statement reflects a strong and uncompromising stance by the Islamic Republic of Iran against perceived aggressions, particularly referring to "Zionist terrorists," which typically points to Israel in the language used by Iranian officials. Such rhetoric underscores the heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, which have long been adversaries in the Middle East.

If this escalates into a conflict, it could have significant implications for regional stability, potentially drawing in multiple actors from across the region and beyond. The statement highlights Iran's willingness to retaliate forcefully, reinforcing its position as a central figure in the broader geopolitical struggles in the Middle East, particularly in relation to Israel and its allies.

 
Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, has issued a stark warning regarding potential Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. In a recent interview, he stated that any attack on Iran's nuclear infrastructure would be met with equivalent retaliation against Israel's own nuclear sites. This declaration underscores the escalating tensions between the two nations amid ongoing military confrontations in the region.
Key Points from Araghchi's Statement
  • Retaliation Assurance: Araghchi emphasized that any assault on Iran would be considered a "crossing of red lines" and would provoke a significant response. He indicated that Iran has already identified military targets within Israel, signaling readiness to defend itself if attackes.
  • Context of Tensions: The remarks come in the wake of heightened military activity, including Iran's missile strikes on Israel earlier this month, which were reportedly in retaliation for the assassination of key figures associated with Hezbollah and Hamas. These actions have intensified fears of a broader conflict in the Middle East.
  • Military Preparedness: Araghchi reassured that Iran does not seek war but is prepared to respond proportionately to any aggression. He noted that while Iran has focused its attacks on military targets, this approach might change if provoked further
Broader Implications
The implications of such statements are profound, particularly in light of the delicate geopolitical landscape in the region:
  • Potential for Escalation: Analysts warn that an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities could lead to significant retaliation, potentially drawing in other regional players and escalating into a wider conflict. The historical context suggests that aggressive actions may provoke unintended consequences, as seen in past conflicts involving Iraq and Israel.
  • International Reactions: The international community, including Russia and the United States, has expressed concern over potential military actions against Iran. Russian officials have cautioned Israel against considering strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, labeling such actions as provocations that could destabilize the region further
  • Strategic Calculations: As tensions mount, both nations are likely recalibrating their military strategies. Israel continues to assert its right to defend itself against perceived threats from Iran and its proxies, while Iran remains firm on its stance regarding its nuclear program and regional influence.
Conclusion
The rhetoric surrounding Iran's nuclear capabilities and Israel's potential military responses highlights a precarious situation fraught with risks. As both nations prepare for possible confrontations, the focus will be on diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and prevent a conflict that could have far-reaching consequences for regional stability.

Israeli PM natanyahu says that Iran's nuclear facilities will
be attacked very soon. Iran will never be allowed to built nuclear weapon.
1729495428848.jpeg
 
Israeli PM natanyahu says that Iran's nuclear facilities will
be attacked very soon. Iran will never be allowed to built nuclear weapon.
View attachment 1033233
Iran will change its Nuclear Doctrine if Israel strikes nuclear facilities,
and in return will decimate Israel's nuclear facilities - Iran's military to Tasnim

1729505467934.jpeg
 
Iran will change its Nuclear Doctrine if Israel strikes nuclear facilities,
and in return will decimate Israel's nuclear facilities - Iran's military to Tasnim

View attachment 1033244

If we think rationally there is possibility of enemy using nuclear option if you dont have nuclear option. They already used it in ww2 against Japan and nothing happened. There is nothing that will block them from using that other than using your mind and taking rational precautions against that possibility. Yes Ukraine will be nuked as well once the nukes are used by israel but it would not be a big price for israel-usa nexus.

Yes the weapons still may not be used for whatever reason like a miracle or similar that is a possibility but first step is to use your mind and do whatever it takes. After that you can trust. You need to combine your mind thinking-taking precautions with certainity-trust. Otherwise there wont be balance and you will be responsible for the outcome.

Nuclear bombs will take several years to produce. Announcing that you are nuclear also will make other countries nuclear as well(saudi arabia for example). So for Iran it will be better to not to announce nuclear bombs even if they develop them. Instead the best strategy would be to get radioactive deterrance first and after that nuclear deterrance. Ballistic missiles are enough for delivery options of radioactive warheads. Radioactive deterrance is enough against small araes like isreal.

A warhead with small uranium bullets is easy to build with no nuclear technology base other than radioactive protection measures for storage and usage and can create radioactive zone over a large area when it explodes at sufficient altitude. Cobalt60 can be produced in reactors and can be used in a warhead as dust particles to spread radiation over a very large area depending on the high altitude the missile explodes. Cobalt60, Iridium and other radioactive materials can also be bought abroad for medical use. So it is dual use and can be obtained easily.

After 20+ Cobalt60-Iridium warhads and 60+ uranium bullet warheads you can build whatever you want they cant use nukes on you(unless they want israel turn to chernobyl). Annoncing you are nuclear is up to you then you can claim regular earthquakes after tests.
 
Last edited:

US ‘deeply concerned’ about intelligence leak about Israel’s Iran strike plans

Reuters
October 21, 2024

2121444150d17e0.jpg



WASHINGTON: The United States remains “deeply concerned” about the leak of a pair of highly classified intelligence documents describing Israel’s preparations for a retaliatory strike on Iran, the White House said on Monday.

There is no indication that additional documents have been compromised and US officials have been in communication with Israeli counterparts about the leak, White House spokesperson John Kirby told reporters.
 

What leaked US assessment of Israeli plans to strike Iran shows​


Frank Gardner
Security Correspondent, BBC


EPA The wreckage of an Iranian ballistic missile outside the city of Arad, southern Israel, 02 October 2024


EPA

The wreckage of a missile in southern Israel, one of 180 that Iran launched at it on 1 October

US investigators are trying to find out how a pair of highly classified intelligence documents were leaked online.

The documents, which appeared on the messaging app Telegram on Friday, contain an alleged US assessment of Israeli plans to attack Iran.

The assessment is based on interpretation of satellite imagery and other intelligence.

On Monday White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said President Joe Biden was "deeply concerned" about the leak.

Officials have not determined whether the documents were released due to a hack or a leak, Mr Kirby said.

For three weeks now, Israel has been vowing to hit Iran hard in retaliation for Iran’s massed ballistic missile attack on Israel on 1 October.

Iran says that was in response to Israel’s assassination of the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, on 27 September.

Are the documents genuine?​

Military analysts say the phrasing used in the headings looks credible and is consistent with similar classified documents revealed in the past.

Headed "Top Secret", they include the acronym "FGI", standing for "Foreign Government Intelligence".

The documents appear to have been circulated to intelligence agencies in the Five Eyes alliance, the five Western nations that regularly share intelligence, namely the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The acronym "TK" in the documents refers to "Talent Keyhole", a codeword covering satellite-based Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Imagery Intelligence (IMINT).

What do they tell us?​

Taken together, the two documents are a classified US assessment of Israel’s preparations to hit targets in Iran, based on intelligence analysed on 15-16 October by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

What features prominently is the mention of two Air Launched Ballistic Missile (ABLM) systems: Golden Horizon and Rocks.

Rocks is a long-range missile system made by the Israeli company Rafael and designed to hit a variety of targets both above and below ground. Golden Horizon is thought to refer to the Blue Sparrow missile system with a range of around 2,000km (1,240 miles).

The significance of this is that it would indicate that the Israeli Air Force is planning to carry out a similar but greatly expanded version of its ABLM attack on an Iranian radar site near Isfahan in April.

By launching these weapons from long range and far from Iran’s borders it would avoid the need for Israeli warplanes to overfly certain countries in the region like Jordan.

The documents also report no sign of any preparations by Israel to activate its nuclear deterrent.

At the request of Israel, the US government never publicly acknowledges that its close ally Israel even possesses nuclear weapons, so this has caused some embarrassment in Washington.

What do they​

Glaringly absent from these documents is any mention of what targets Israel intends to hit in Iran, or when.

The US has made no secret of its opposition to the targeting of either Iran’s nuclear research facilities or its oil installations.

That leaves military bases, most likely those belonging to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and its affiliated Basij militia as these two institutions are seen as the backbone of the Islamic Republic, projecting its military reach abroad and suppressing popular protest at home.

As regards timing, many had expected Israel to have carried out its promised retaliation by now. But back in April, Iran waited 12 days before hitting back at Israel with a barrage of 300 drones and missiles after an Israeli air strike hit its diplomatic buildings in Damascus, killing several senior IRGC commanders.

Part of the current delay in Israel’s response is likely due to US concerns at escalation with less than a month to go before the US presidential elections.

Were they leaked on purpose?​

Possibly yes, by someone who wanted to derail Israel’s plans.

Iran has a large and sophisticated cyber-warfare capability so the possibility of a hostile hack is also being investigated.

These documents, if genuine as thought highly likely, show that despite the close defence relationship between the US and Israel, Washington still spies on its ally in case it is not being given the full picture.

They show that plans by the Israeli Air Force to carry out some kind of long-range retaliation against Iran are well advanced and that mitigation is being put in place against an expected Iranian response.

In short: if and when Israel does carry out these plans then the Middle East will once again experience a period of extreme tension.
 
Some plans
Israel says a "very significant attack" will be carried out on Iran soon.

View attachment 1033254
They can do some air launched ballistic missiles as another method of attack which is also hinted at the exposed attack plan documents. Low probability but tactical nukes can be used to penetrate Iranian underground bunkers. It is hard to prove but with radioactive measurement devices it can be proven if radioactive items are not stored in those bunkers. If nuclear installations are hit with tactical nukes there will be radiation fallout and they can claim tactical nukes are not used. Efficient video survaillance systems(uav or ground based watching on nuclear installations) can prove the explosion is a tactial nuclear device.
Jericho is an old system and not maneuvrable possibly aimed at nuclear exchange. They can be taken down by Bawar 373 - S 400 type of systems.
 
If we think rationally there is possibility of enemy using nuclear option if you dont have nuclear option. They already used it in ww2 against Japan and nothing happened. There is nothing that will block them from using that other than using your mind and taking rational precautions against that possibility. Yes Ukraine will be nuked as well once the nukes are used by israel but it would not be a big price for israel-usa nexus.

Yes the weapons still may not be used for whatever reason like a miracle or similar that is a possibility but first step is to use your mind and do whatever it takes. After that you can trust. You need to combine your mind thinking-taking precautions with certainity-trust. Otherwise there wont be balance and you will be responsible for the outcome.

Nuclear bombs will take several years to produce. Announcing that you are nuclear also will make other countries nuclear as well(saudi arabia for example). So for Iran it will be better to not to announce nuclear bombs even if they develop them. Instead the best strategy would be to get radioactive deterrance first and after that nuclear deterrance. Ballistic missiles are enough for delivery options of radioactive warheads. Radioactive deterrance is enough against small araes like isreal.

A warhead with small uranium bullets is easy to build with no nuclear technology base other than radioactive protection measures for storage and usage and can create radioactive zone over a large area when it explodes at sufficient altitude. Cobalt60 can be produced in reactors and can be used in a warhead as dust particles to spread radiation over a very large area depending on the high altitude the missile explodes. Cobalt60, Iridium and other radioactive materials can also be bought abroad for medical use. So it is dual use and can be obtained easily.

After 20+ Cobalt60-Iridium warhads and 60+ uranium bullet warheads you can build whatever you want they cant use nukes on you(unless they want israel turn to chernobyl). Annoncing you are nuclear is up to you then you can claim regular earthquakes after tests.
Iranian Foreign Minister
 
Israel says a "very significant attack" will be carried out on Iran soon.

View attachment 1033254
Israel appears to be planning to enter a full-scale war with Iran. Israeli Channel 13: 'Cabinet ministers were informed that a 'very significant' attack in Iran will soon take place, and they will not be briefed in advance on its nature; Israel believes that Iran will respond forcefully to the attack'

1729591699340.jpeg
 
Israel appears to be planning to enter a full-scale war with Iran. Israeli Channel 13: 'Cabinet ministers were informed that a 'very significant' attack in Iran will soon take place, and they will not be briefed in advance on its nature; Israel believes that Iran will respond forcefully to the attack'

View attachment 1033268
Iran has total escalation dominance. This is an entirely different game from
fighting Hezbollah and Hamas. Notice how Israel is especially cautious concerning them.

 
Israel appears to be planning to enter a full-scale war with Iran. Israeli Channel 13: 'Cabinet ministers were informed that a 'very significant' attack in Iran will soon take place, and they will not be briefed in advance on its nature; Israel believes that Iran will respond forcefully to the attack'

View attachment 1033268
ISRAEL is planning a "VERY SIGNIFICANT" attack on Iran, and they will not be briefed in advance on its nature.Israel believes that Iran will "respond FORCEFULLY to the attack.

1729672783312.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom