Those are Tweets not proper news articles. Also, the text in these Tweets does not actually match the words of the spokesperson as can be heard in a video posted right beneath one of these same Tweets.
Also, do you realize that even the two texts you referenced (one in English, the other in Persian) differ from each other? Further indication that these are not exact transcriptions of the spokesman's words!
Yes, however as I indicated, he was no longer talking about the issue when the video ended.
The duration of the video is 2:20. He only addresses this question of purported outside interference from 0:16 to 0:48. So what you're suggesting is that he came back to it at some later point after the video ends, which in my opinion is rather unlikely.
You can do better than these repetitive ad hominem accusations. I am trying to have a rational discussion here.
We have a clip where the spokesperson can be heard commenting on our topic of interest. In this clip, he first begins talking about something else (0:00-0:15), then deals with the question of foreign intervention (0:16-0:48) and then changes the subject for more than one and half minutes until the video ends.
Now you're claiming that he returned to the foreign intervention topic at some later point, which is missing from the video. Well, I'd say that here the burden of proof lies on you.
But actually, I have found a recording of the entire press conference from start to finish, straight from the website of Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
It's in several parts. Here are the links, in chronological order:
https://mfa.ir/portal/playvideos/16526
https://mfa.ir/portal/playvideos/16528
https://mfa.ir/portal/playvideos/16529
Please point me to where the spokesman is naming Pakistan in this context. Thank you.