What's new

Iran Decides to AcComplete Takeover of Afghanistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently Pakistan has conducted drone strikes killing prominent leaders of Panjshir. This act will surely intensify the civil war in Afghanistan and it is Indeed an irresponsible act which violates all international norms.

In this situation, Iran condemns any Foreign attempt to intensify the conflict which will end up with brother killing in Afghanistan.

Pakistani role in surrounding Panjshir and stopping water and food supplies to people of Panjshir is an inhumane act. This must stop as soon as possible and Iran won't sit and watch the miseries imposed on people of Afghanistan.

These were the points raised by spokesman of Foreign Affairs and i can't really find any wrong in it if Pakistan truly killed leaders of Panjshir which in return would make intra Afghan negotiations impossible.
Do you have any proof of this or are you just parrotting your buddy india's propaganda
 
.
Again this was reported by Tehran times.


This was also reported by 'Iran International English' which is a verified account.
Iranian members of PDF are also supporting this news article stating that ' in Iran it has been all over social media'.



https://twitter.com/IranIntl_En?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1434632111869333511|twgr^|twcon^s2_&ref_url=https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran-decides-to-act-as-a-clown-after-complete-takeover-of-afghanistan.722459/page-4


 
Last edited:
.
isolated voices from isolated countries shall not be allowed to spoil peace in Afghanistan.
 
. .
And I am really disappointed about foreign intervention

You know it's just a dog wissle...

Cause A there's no evidence of it

So would you apologize for it if it turns out incorrect?
You could have just talked to us directly or asked the Panjshir guys to provide atleast evidence (as in a video) issuing public statements is not cool

#bring back Shah our beloved Iran deserves better, this "Islamic" republic is just out to create frictions with people who want no friction
 
.
There are two tweets. One in English and another in Persian

The English one:


Clearly Pakistan is mentioned. No question by any reporter here

The Persian one:


Again pakistan is mentioned

Both times by your Spokesman. You think we are some sort of idiots or something??

Except that none of these Tweets correctly reflect the spokesman's exact words. It's sloppy journalism, mixing parts of the question with parts of the reply. The spokesman however respected diplomatic norms and avoided naming any outside country.

You keep referring to texts, but I'm inviting you to listen to the actual words of the spokesman which these texts are supposed to transcribe. His words are audible enough. Just play the video, and you'll realize he does not mention any country other than Afghanistan.

He is lying

Not at all, you can ask a million Iranians to translate that video for you, you'll get the same reply. I responded to another user's request for a translation, and I did so in good faith.

Besides, if you're saying that the spokesman does actually mention Pakistan in that clip, then please tell me at what time exactly this is supposed to be the case.
 
Last edited:
.
ther problem is simple... whenever something starts to work for us Pakistanis.. then our "Ummah" regardless of who they a re be it saudis, or iranis, or turks they will try to jump in to make it harder for us... all because of their "EGO". But pakistan is destined to be something else, while they can continue to live in their past glories!

Why include Turkey when it supported Pakistan in UN on Kashmir, in FATF and manufacturing Frigates for Pakistan and now licensing out drone manufacturing in Pakistan.

And why include SA when they provided hard cash to keep Pakistan away from bankruptcy in 1998 & again in 2018.

But then again I think it is 'thankless personality syndrome' that some Pakistani suffers from. When hard time passes, then yeah we do not acknowledge any favors which were extended to us.
 
.
Salaam


The Northern Alliance was composed of Sunnis essentially. And on certain occasions, they even fought Shia Hazara groups. Iran backed both these parties despite their occasional infighting. Have you not seen how Ismail Khan, a Sunni, was peacefully escorted by to Iran by the Taliban?

I would advise into falling into this trap concocted by the zionists, the US and their clients, which consists in interpreting Iranian policy as well as the Afghan theater in sectarian terms (in fact, the ethnic factor has prevailed over confessional divisions in Afghanistan). Nobody would benefit from these sorts of tensions except the common enemies of Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and Russia.


Bro, I think the issue arose when not only did the text of the tweet mention Pakistan but an Iranian member posted a reply condemning Pakistani involvement and 'inhumane acts' etc.

Though since you've translated the words it seems clear that Pakistan wasn't mentioned by name which is in accordance with diplomatic norms.
 
.
someone needs to go back to february 2019 when india was teething to attck us and iran just had its own falseflag and came out against us
and now this northern alliance 2.0
both times it got decimated
we only remember india but no one talks about iran why?
they are not ours they will always be against us kubhushan is just tip of the ice berg
 
.
The Northern Alliance was composed of Sunnis essentially. And on certain occasions, they even fought Shia Hazara groups. Iran backed both these parties despite their occasional infighting. Have you not seen how Ismail Khan, a Sunni, was peacefully escorted by to Iran by the Taliban?

I would advise into falling into this trap concocted by the zionists, the US and their clients, which consists in interpreting Iranian policy as well as the Afghan theater in sectarian terms (in fact, the ethnic factor has prevailed over confessional divisions in Afghanistan). Nobody would benefit from these sorts of tensions except the common enemies of Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and Russia.

excellent post highlighting how Iran and Zionists both back opposing parties for their gains.

in Yemen Iran is also doing nation building just like Zionists.

its all fair.
 
.
Iran helped the original Shia resistance against Taliban, the northern alliance.
Now again they are out to create Shia militia in a sunni majority country, same as they have done in pretty much every sunni majority country.

Not going to work

Afghanistan is not Syria or Iraq
 
.
someone needs to go back to february 2019 when india was teething to attck us and iran just had its own falseflag and came out against us
and now this northern alliance 2.0
both times it got decimated
we only remember india but no one talks about iran why?
they are not ours they will always be against us kubhushan is just tip of the ice berg

we have moved on and buried the past.
 
.
This was also reported by 'Iran International English' which is a verified account.
Iranian members of PDF are also supporting this news article stating that ' in Iran it has been all over social media'.



https://twitter.com/IranIntl_En?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1434632111869333511|twgr^|twcon^s2_&ref_url=https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran-decides-to-act-as-a-clown-after-complete-takeover-of-afghanistan.722459/page-4


Well, Iran isn't Pakistan friend and openly does propaganda against Pakistan.
Here's the proof.
 
.
I would advise into falling into this trap concocted by the zionists, the US and their clients, which consists in interpreting Iranian policy as well as the Afghan theater in sectarian terms (in fact, the ethnic factor has prevailed over confessional divisions in Afghanistan).
I hope the irony isn’t lost on you.
 
.
Except that none of these Tweets correctly reflect the spokesman's exact words. It's sloppy journalism, mixing parts of the question with parts of the reply. The spokesman however respected diplomatic norms and avoided naming any outside country.

You keep referring to texts, but I'm inviting you to listen to the actual words of the spokesman which these texts are supposed to transcribe. His words are audible enough. Just play that video, and you'll realize he does not mention any country other than Afghanistan.



Not at all, you can ask a million Iranians to translate that video for you, you'll get the same reply. I responded to another user's request for a translation, and I did so in good faith.

Besides, if you're saying that the spokesman does actually mention Pakistan in that clip, then please tell me at what time exactly this is supposed to be the case.

I listened to the video

The video is incomplete and doesn't contain whole of his answer. We don't have the whole of his answer

This clearly shows that Pakistan is mentioned since both English and Persian contain Pakistan in the text. Both texts are from English and Persian Iranian state affiliated channels

It is useless to lie about something as obvious as this
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom