YES EVERY COUNTRY HAS A RIGHTS OF SELF DEFENSE FROM AGGRESSOR COUNTRY BUT THEY ARE ONLY TRY TO MOCK FUSELAGE OF NIMTIZ CLASS NOT HAVE THE OPTIONS TO MOCK THEIR ANTI SHIP MISSILES TO MIMIC ELECTROIC COUNTER MEASURES AND AND OTHER HARD ANTI MISSILE DEFENSE OF NIMITZ CLASS AND ITS BATTLE GROUP
Ain Al Assad was USA's biggest military base in middle East. It hosted American presidents and defense ministers, therefore One of the most Protected American bases. Protected by THAAD, Patriot Pac3 and other air defense systems. You think that USA is undefeatable Thats where your problem lies.
first soviet tested ASBM in 70s but why don't deploy it, tell us then the answer is simple in 70s tech is not matured enough in that time, for China they have all ingredients to track and engage carrier at sea but not Iran that all Ingredients (satellites/UAVs/long range ship's AESA)
And why do you thinks they stayed their in case of war with Iran??? they have other options to move their assets to near to Iran like base in Deigo Garshia in Indian ocean which is out of reach of Iran ASBM/ASHM and their also an option that they can guide their forces through AIRBORE COMMAND POST FROM DEIGO GARSHIA
Long range X band AESA
Iranian missiles that are supposed to be anti ship tactical ballistic missiles are equipped with optical seekers. For example
After developing Salman engine, IRGC can target Diego base easily. It is a Multi funcrional TVC engine increasing the range of Iranian ballistic missiles.
IRAN should seek peace with all its neighbours and even USA.. its policies are suicidal, Very sad to know.. an ancient civilisation and lovely people driven by visionless ruler mullas...
You still not understand my point why if you carrier moves further to 35 km away from the your ASBM during the long range attacks by Iranian ASBMs, its takes time to reach the target lets suppose you fired/attack at the range of 1500 km it could reach 15 minutes later, you still need mid course update like a constellation satellites (navigation) like GPS/ Chinese Beidu/EU compass/ Russian GLONASSLong range X band AESA
Iranian missiles that are supposed to be anti ship tactical ballistic missiles are equipped with optical seekers. For example
All of them are capable of manuevering after focusing on the target.
Bro we have LPS. Why don't you get it?
And how TVC engine can increase the range of Iranian BMs instead of more mass fraction/ Fuel fraction??? do you know what is the TVC engine is???
Trust Vectoring engineAnd how TVC engine can increase the range of Iranian BMs instead of more mass fraction/ Fuel fraction??? do you know what is the TVC engine is???
Its good only on short range like on Persian gulf theater but at long ranges this strategy is useless (like carrier in Red sea or in Mediterranean sea) no country allow to use their airspace for your drones, and GPS has multiple frequencies several for civilian use and military frequencies is highly encrypted ones its really hard to Iranians software engineers/scientists to decode them
We don't need Permission at war time.
Is that anti gravity engine you ??? Space launch vehicles using this type engine since ages to changes their inclinations (angles with relative to earth Equator) and also ICBMs also using TVC engines that doesn't means they increase their rangeTrust Vectoring engine
Youre exhausting me dude, it increases the range by manuvering in space, minimizing the gravity Effects on the vehicle.
Salman engineIs that anti gravity engine you ??? Space launch vehicles using this type engine since ages to changes their inclinations (angles with relative to earth Equator) and also ICBMs also using TVC engines that doesn't means they increase their range
and for example if that engine will be use on let suppose SHAHAB-3 with same fuel as standard SHAHAB-3 could it be reach far than original SHAHAB-3 range, your illogical arguments doesn't sense me right???
