Iran Launches New military Satellite into Orbit

[DoubleYouSee]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1707329847029043573

https://twitter.com/x/status/1707330753502036211

the first clip proves that flat earth theory is nonsense.the earth curvature is obvious

 

[mohsen]

the first clip proves that flat earth theory is nonsense.the earth curvature is obvious

Buddy, these are childish theories which governments spread to prevent us from seeing the reality.
We are living in the matrix, everything is fake

 

[Bengal71]

Buddy, these are childish theories which governments spread to prevent us from seeing the reality.
We are living in the matrix, everything is fake

In virtual reality, simulation, someone's imagination are real possibilities. No joke.

 

[HAIDER]

wonder why sipah took over the project from govt.

 

[indushek]

Congrats everyone, please do share any pics sent later on.

 

[mohsen]

wonder why sipah took over the project from govt.

Previous pro-west government stopped the space program, so IRGC had to create a parallel program to neutralize their dirty intentions.

 

[Mehdipersian]

wonder why sipah took over the project from govt.

Previous pro-west government stopped the space program, so IRGC had to create a parallel program to neutralize their dirty intentions.

Also sepah have military satellite programs and Iranian Space Agency have Civilian satellites

 

[TheImmortal]

Previous pro-west government stopped the space program, so IRGC had to create a parallel program to neutralize their dirty intentions.

Makes no sense considering 2 IRGC engineers died on ISA launch pad accident just this year. IRGC is heavily involved in civilian program. The issue ISA designs quite frankly suck. Simorgh was underpowered and flawed 2nd stage and they didn’t pivot. Zoljanah the jury is out and it’s using tech from 2010. Sarir is just a redesigned Simorgh after they realized yeah the design sucks let’s fix the flaw.

IRGC isn’t handing over new tech to that den of spies and is taking over more of the launch prep after some suspicious explosions that may have been sabotaged. Especially after big mouth trump flashes the classified intelligence photo.

The fact is IRGC is using solid fuel launchers while ISA uses liquid fuel launchers with a transition to the generally accepted cryogenic launchers by 2030. (Hopefully)

There is zero chance IRGC will hand over a military satellite to ISA spies to launch.

Problem is neither group can launch a satellite if it weighs more than an average woman (50kg). So we are stuck with micro satellites - 15 year after our first launch.

Let me just say this US launched the first communications satellite in 1958 and it weighed 68KG. This the same year as their first satellite Explorer 1.

So I’m confident when I say that Iran can certainly build something stronger than a V2 looking rocket from 65 years ago. And yes US space program used Nazi designs especially in the early years courtesy of Von Braun (Father of Nazi Missile program).

 

[Trisolaran]

Congratulations.. Although we argue on other issues, I am happy to see that Iran is generally successful.

 

[TheImmortal]

I just thought of something:

Nearly every Iranian SLV right now uses a Shahab-3/Ghadr variant first stage or of similar performance. Which means a first stage capable of 1700-1800 KM (assuming a constant 2nd stage). A typical Shahab-3 has a payload of 650-750kg. Which means that to LEO (500km) the max Iran is pulling out of these “missiles” is about 10% of payload (65-75kg). The exception here is newest gen Shahab-3 variant: Ghadr-110 that can allegedly take a 1000kg 1700+KM on a ballistic path.

Now wild idea:

Iran takes Kheibar and converts it to SLV.

We know that it can take at least 1500kg to at least 2000KM on a ballistic trajectory. Now we know Kheibar uses a special fuel mixture that is neither liquid nor solid. Secondly we know it has a better stronger frame material.

So the changes would be to eliminate warhead stage and put in Salman kick stage plus satellite system in its place. Eliminate stronger frame and replace with lighter and weaker frame since the rocket won’t be re entering earth’s atmosphere. This causes weight savings. Elongate the tanks that were miniaturized due to trying A) reduce missile range for geopolitical reasons B) accompany a more Stronger metal ie again adding more weight to missile to reduce range.

My theory is Iran is lying and payload is higher for longer. So under this modification scheme, Kheibar would have space payload of at least 200kg with the potential of up to 300-500kg to LEO.

This would allow the deployment of up to 10 cube sats (50kg) at the same time or 2-3 150kg satellites containing more powerful equipment.

Iran has already copied my
-underground airbase idea
-microjet S-136 idea

Copy this whoever is reading this. It will work

 

[Hack-Hook]

Iran has already copied my
-underground airbase idea
-microjet S-136 idea

The underground airbase for fighter jets made absolutely zero sense and till today Iran just put bombers into that base

 

[TheImmortal]

The underground airbase for fighter jets made absolutely zero sense and till today Iran just put bombers into that base

• Taiwan has the biggest underground airbase can fit over 100 fighters.
• China had nuclear proof ones.
• North Korea has underground base with a runway for fighter jets to take off out of.

It makes sense against an enemy that will try to neutralize your air power in opening days of war. If Ukraine had these they would have kept 80% their air-force the first 30 days of war. Even today nearly 2 year later, Russia cannot destroy remaining Ukraine fighters that park in open space or weak shelters.

Iran just doesn’t have any aircraft worth putting in there at the current moment. Something in J-31 or SU-75 class would be perfect. Massive planes like F-14 and SU-35 are doable except more engineering headache.

 

[Khanivore]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1707329847029043573

https://twitter.com/x/status/1707330753502036211

Nice... but crude CGI job. Awful, just awful. They need NASA grade budget to fake it as good as NASA. But hey, it's Iran.

 

[Hack-Hook]

• Taiwan has the biggest underground airbase can fit over 100 fighters.
• China had nuclear proof ones.
• North Korea has underground base with a runway for fighter jets to take off out of.

It makes sense against an enemy that will try to neutralize your air power in opening days of war. If Ukraine had these they would have kept 80% their air-force the first 30 days of war. Even today nearly 2 year later, Russia cannot destroy remaining Ukraine fighters that park in open space or weak shelters.

Iran just doesn’t have any aircraft worth putting in there at the current moment. Something in J-31 or SU-75 class would be perfect. Massive planes like F-14 and SU-35 are doable except more engineering headache.

When they were built?
And as said fighter must be able to take of in 5 to 10 min. You are welcome to achieve that in underground bases
And no su-34 and other such aircrafts are far better for such bases

 

[Khanivore]

the first clip proves that flat earth theory is nonsense.the earth curvature is obvious

... It looks awfully crude for what they're showing us. Almost like a 90s computer game.