What's new

IP project in jeopardy:US threatens curbs if Pakistan pursues Iran deal: PM

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
JEDDAH:
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Sunday said the United States has warned that the Iran-Pakistan (IP) gas pipeline project could invoke sanctions on the country in the future.

Some 48 hours earlier, Foreign Office spokesperson Aizaz Chaudhry had disclosed that the government had presented US Secretary of State John Kerry a ‘non-paper’ over the IP pipeline, conveying Pakistan’s standpoint that the project was being undertaken to address the country’s acute energy requirements.

In the past too Washington has voiced serious concerns about the pipeline project. Earlier this year, then US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said that Pakistan risked sparking US sanctions if it pursues its plans to build the $7.5 billion gas pipeline.

Speaking to a delegation of the Pakistan Journalists Forum at Sharif Villa, the residence of his son Hussain Nawaz Sharif, on Sunday, the prime minister said that he had clearly conveyed Pakistan’s demand to end the CIA-led drone campaign during his meeting with Secretary Kerry.

On Thursday, the US secretary of state held out the hope that the controversial drone campaign could end ‘very soon’. His comments, made during an interview with PTV, were subsequently downplayed by US officials.

Talking to reporters, Prime Minister Nawaz said he would draft a comprehensive policy on Kashmir and other issues after consulting all political parties. He called for ending the arms race in the region and urged India to join Pakistan in reducing the two country’s defence budgets.

“Regional peace will remain under threat until there is a balance in armament… We want peace and for that both countries [India and Pakistan] must put a cap on their defence spending,” he said.

“No one, apart from common people, has suffered from the wars between us.”

Replying to a question on Afghanistan, the premier said the country will adopt a policy of ‘non-interference’. Pakistan will not support a particular group in Afghanistan at the expense of others, he maintained, adding that Pakistan supports the Doha process because it is expected to serve regional and international interests.

In response to another question, Premier Nawaz said a commission was investigating allegations against former president Pervez Musharraf and that he would refrain from commenting on the matter till it compiled its report. He added that he did not believe in the politics of revenge.
Talking about the country’s energy crisis, he said it was sad that a nuclear power was beset by chronic electricity shortage. Generating power would not have been such a difficult matter, he said, had previous governments fulfilled their responsibilities and devised plans to meet the shortage.

“Had they done some work on this end, the situation would have been much different,” he contended, adding that since his government had to start from ‘scratch’, it would take some time to solve the crisis.

“The electricity deficit will be dealt within three to four years,” Prime Minister Nawaz reiterated. He announced that the government was working on a dam that would both end the country’s power woes and benefit the agriculture sector. The premier said work on the Thar coal project was also being carried out and would help overcome the power crisis.

Prime Minister Nawaz said Pakistan was confronted by several challenges at the moment, such as terrorism, sectarianism, power shortage, economic woes and depleted resources. He said that these challenges would be solved with mutual cooperation.

He stressed that Pakistan will have to adopt the rule of law, end the scourge of terrorism and extremism, and create a new political culture in order to be a civilised nation.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 5th, 2013.
 
. .
After the Kerry visit to Pakistan, GOTUS has refuted/repudiated/repelled all the points raised by GoP.
What kind of "Dialog" is this?

Quid pro quo Captain. GoP's got to put out to get something in return otherwise the Black Ninja will keep squeezing.
 
. . .
After the Kerry visit to Pakistan, GOTUS has refuted/repudiated/repelled all the points raised by GoP.
What kind of "Dialog" is this?

This kind of "dialogue" is mean to provide suitable platitudes to a population that traditionally has a short memory. It works very well actually. Example: Hum IMF kee ankhon mein ankhein daal ker baat karein gey (We will talk to IMF eye-to-eye), and we all know what really happened with the new loans. In this story, the example is: "he had clearly conveyed Pakistan’s demand to end the CIA-led drone campaign" as if that "demand" actually means anything. See how easy it is?
 
.
Timing of the agreement was always suspicious. There was no serious intention to go ahead with this project. PPP just wanted to make life tough for the incoming govt by signing the agreement just before the elections. Even current govt in Pakistan failed to allocate any amount from this years budget for this project. Just goes to show that this pipeline project is nothing but a pipe dream.
 
.
This kind of "dialogue" is mean to provide suitable platitudes to a population that traditionally has a short memory. It works very well actually. Example: Hum IMF kee ankhon mein ankhein daal ker baat karein gey (We will talk to IMF eye-to-eye), and we all know what really happened with the new loans. In this story, the example is: "he had clearly conveyed Pakistan’s demand to end the CIA-led drone campaign" as if that "demand" actually means anything. See how easy it is?

Oh, I just remembered your 'observation' about the "Hip-Hop" and the "Bhangra" :D
 
.
Oh, I just remembered your 'observation' about the "Hip-Hop" and the "Bhangra" :D

I only try to do justice to my moniker, to observe, even when I know it is futile.

This project has disaster written all over it, with sanctions if it goes ahead, with unaffordably high price of gas tied in to the price of oil when gas prices are falling, and with the lack of money.

And yet we keep talking about it as if it will help solve solve our energy problems. Even if financed, and with a lower price of gas, and with no sanctions, this pipeline cannot alleviate the huger gas shortages looming over us. It can mitigate the situation somewhat even in this ideal conditions.
 
.
I only try to do justice to my moniker, to observe, even when I know it is futile.

This project has disaster written all over it, with sanctions if it goes ahead, with unaffordably high price of gas tied in to the price of oil when gas prices are falling, and with the lack of money.

And yet we keep talking about it as if it will help solve solve our energy problems. Even if financed, and with a lower price of gas, and with no sanctions, this pipeline cannot alleviate the huger gas shortages looming over us. It can mitigate the situation somewhat even in this ideal conditions.

That has been the basic problem with the IP deal; the contracted price of the gas on offer. That is the main reason why India 'voted with its feet' and left the discussions. Apart from the other issues.
 
. .
Well, India has a foreign policy. We have a foreign diktat. Big difference.

Well yes. Then there is/has been the eternal question of where the Foreign Policy is formulated.
Better to leave it there and hope for the best; going forward.
 
.
Well yes. Then there is/has been the eternal question of where the Foreign Policy is formulated.
Better to leave it there and hope for the best; going forward.

Yes Sir, I am learning it is best to leave things as they are rather than raising any substantive issues.

Viva IP pap-lan!

We need gas and lots of it, and cheap. That is quite a conundrum to solve in practical terms.
 
.
Even a weak state could have explained to the US that this project is needed in a poor country where there is radicalism, extremism and unemployment.

The truth is that PML-N does not want it because of some brotherly countries. This exercise was merely to show that US is not willing and we cannot risk it.

Pathetic joke.
 
.
Yes Sir, I am learning it is best to leave things as they are rather than raising any substantive issues.

Viva IP pap-lan!

We need gas and lots of it, and cheap. That is quite a conundrum to solve in practical terms.

But somebody here did bring up copious amounts of gas!
Well; not the tight gas itself, but the news of its existence. Maybe that can be put to work.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom