What's new

Into the Arms of the Rising Sun: Japan Beating China in Race for Indian Ocean Deep-Sea Port

@kalu_miah @BDforever @bongbang @UKBengali @Bang Galore @levina @Spectre @scorpionx @SpArK @MilSpec @Slav Defence @WebMaster @Horus @Shotgunner51 @Yizhi @TaiShang @cnleio @Edison Chen et al !

------------
488x-1.jpg


Japan is beating out China in a race to build Bangladesh’s first deep-sea port as the region’s powers jostle for a foothold in the Indian Ocean.

Construction of the 18-meter-deep port at Matarbari on Bangladesh’s southeast coast is set to start by January, Japan International Cooperation Agency said in an e-mailed response to questions from Bloomberg News. That’s bad news for a stalled China plan to build a port about 25 kilometers (15 miles) away.

“I’d imagine there’s only room for one port,” said Krispen Atkinson, a maritime analyst at IHS Inc., citing the cost to build railway lines and approach channels. “There are probably political reasons behind it as well. If you’re looking to build a port and want Western support as well, would a port financed by China be the favored option?”

The deal would mark a setback for China in South Asia, where it’s seeking to establish economic and military ties in a region that carries about 80 percent of its oil imports. The Bay of Bengal, a body of water bigger than Mexico, lies at the heart of an area where China, Japan and India are investing billions of dollars to secure economic gains for decades to come.

“There’s a remarkable scramble going on,” said David Brewster, a visiting fellow at the Australian National University in Canberra, who called the bay a “twin” to the South China Sea. “The Japanese clearly see themselves in competition with China, and control over ports is seen as important. I expect the Japanese are very happy about this.”

Shallow Ports
Bangladesh’s government confirmed that work on the Matarbari port is scheduled to start early in 2016, while saying talks on the China-backed port at Sonadia island are still underway.

Bangladesh hasn’t built a new seaport since independence in 1971. It’s wanted a deepwater one for more than a decade as the country turned into the world’s second-biggest exporter of garments, which account for 15 percent of gross national product.

Waters surrounding Bangladesh’s two main ports -- Chittagong and Mongla -- are so shallow that vessels have to wait for an incoming tide to berth and an outgoing one to leave. Bigger ships currently need to transfer their loads to smaller vessels. The longer turnaround can cost an extra $15,000 per day, making Chittagong several times pricier than ports in neighboring countries.

The Matarbari port, at 18 meters (59 feet), would be deep enough to host the largest container vessels, according to IHS’s Atkinson.

China Stutters
To pay for a bigger port, Bangladesh needs help. That’s where the region’s major powers come in.

While a Japanese company in 2009 completed studies for the Bangladesh government for a port at Sonadia, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina initially sought help to build it from China, which she once called the “most dependable and consistent friend of Bangladesh.” Since at least 2012, China has publicly backed the Sonadia project.

Newspapers speculated that the deal would be clinched when Hasina visited Beijing last year. Yet it never happened.

“Although the Sonadia deepwater port project failed to get signed, both sides expressed willingness to have further negotiations,” Chinese state media reported at the time.

Months later, a member of her cabinet revealed a key reason for the delay.

Asia Gateway
“Some countries, including India and the United States, are against the Chinese involvement,” Planning Minister A.H.M. Mustafa Kamal told reporters in January, according to the Dhaka Tribune. The government is rethinking Sonadia since Matarbari is only 25 kilometers away, he said.

M.A. Mannan, state minister for finance and planning, said there’s room for both ports. Matarbari would be used mostly for handling coal imports to supply power plants, while Sonadia would be a “full-fledged deep-sea port,” he said.

But the Japanese have more ambitious plans. Matarbari port can be “an important trade gateway to the rest of Asia and beyond,” JICA President Akihiko Tanaka said in a speech at the University of Dhaka last year.

Even state-run Coal Power Generation Company Bangladesh Ltd., which is executing the project with JICA, says the port will contribute to “large-scale commercial development.”

Shinzo Abe in September became the first Japanese prime minister in 14 years to visit Bangladesh. Earlier he offered Hasina 600 billion yen ($4.8 billion) in loans for the project.

Marine Turtles
JICA envisions building electricity transmission lines, highways and rail links to build an industrial corridor on par with Thailand’s Eastern Seaboard, which now accounts for more than half of the country’s trade.

The total cost of Matarbari, which includes a 1,200 megawatt coal power plant, would be about 450 billion yen. JICA said it has begun disbursing a 41.5 billion yen loan for preparatory work, and a group led by Sumitomo Corp. will complete the project survey by November. Sumitomo didn’t respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

Matarbari is a small island of shrimp farms and salt pans. Sonadia -- home to mangroves, migratory birds and marine turtles -- has been designated an environmentally critical area, another obstacle to building a deep-sea port.

Sites along the Bay of Bengal are particularly strategic to China. In January, China National Petroleum Corp. began pumping oil from a new deep-water port in Myanmar. China Harbour Engineering Co. is helping upgrade Chittagong port.

‘Tectonic Change’
While China has close ties to Pakistan and has sought to improve relations with Indian Ocean countries, it suffered a setback when Sri Lanka elected a new president who shifted toward India. Less than a year ago, a Chinese submarine had docked a port in Colombo developed in part with China’s help.

If Sonadia fails to materialize, news reports suggest China may help develop another port at Payra. When Hasina officially kicked off construction in 2013, the plan was for the port to handle vessels as deep as 10 meters.

For China and Japan, Indian Ocean ports are valuable. Besides carrying most of the world’s oil trade, the seas provide access to some of the world’s most populous and fastest growing markets. Bangladesh has about 166 million people, the fifth most in Asia.

“The Bay of Bengal is centrally located within this tectonic change,” JICA’s Tanaka said in last year’s speech. “Bangladesh, in other words, is the linchpin.”



Japan Beating China in Race for Indian Ocean Deep-Sea Port - Bloomberg Business



Congrats to Japan and Bangladesh!
  • First of all from perspective of BD, it's surely a good news! Though China will continue to expand Chittagang however the shallow waters naturally cap the port capacity, it wouldn't satisfy BD's fast growing demand, the country has 2nd largest garment industry in the world. While Sonadia, a full-fledged deep-sea port of strategic importance, is pending discussion with China (issues like environmental are yet to be addressed), the fast tracking Matarbari port as a coal-handling hub will help boost immediate electricity production capacity. On top of deep pocket and port construction tech, Japan has leading tech in coal-fired powerplant and hence is an excellent partner on Matarbari. Now that with addition of Japan, Bangladesh infra will accelerate!
  • Is a good news for Japan winning this Matarbari port project, that's a promising long-term business, strategically positioned to help secure Japan's trading routes. Good score for team Japan!
Since China is being mentioned in a Japan-Bangladesh deal, I might as well comment more on the topic.
  • China was mentioned in a way typically found among western media like Bloomberg i.e. hate, anyway that doesn't matter. China will continue friendship and business with BD, existing co-operations will carry on, new projects will be actively pursued, well this they can't change, can they? Now this matters.
  • I have noticed your "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" series of threads, very well written bro! Will you publish a book on that? On Bangladesh, like I said earlier in other threads, China is anticipating more fierce competition from Japan.
  • Similarly China will face increased Japanese competition in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, though China might have some advantages, say early mover advantage in SL and MM, SCO/Eurasian integration of PK. Japan has a clear upperhand in India with "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" campaign, China isn't likely to get much involved there from the very beginning.
  • In other regions both are also competing, say ASEAN, Central-Asian stans, Sub-Saharan Africa, MENA, Latin America and CEE.
  • To summarize the above, in the area of infra export & investment, China sees Japan as a powerful competitor not just in BD but on a global vision. Well this game is a bit more humane than selling arms or mind drugs isn't it? Team China will score some, so is team Japan (JICA, Sumitomo, Kawasaki, Hitachi, ...), the recipient countries/regions always benefit, what a good sports bro!
 
Last edited:
.
  • To summarize the above, in the area of infra export & investment, China sees Japan as a powerful competitor not just in BD but on a global vision. Well this game is a bit more humane than selling arms or mind drugs isn't it? Team China will score some, so is team Japan (JICA, Sumitomo, Kawasaki, Hitachi, ...), the recipient countries/regions always benefit, what a good sports bro!

It's natural competition, so I shouldn't be worried, eh? :angel: :agree:
 
. .
Congrats to Japan and Bangladesh!
  • First of all from perspective of BD, it's surely a good news! Though China will continue to expand Chittagang however the shallow waters naturally cap the port capacity, it wouldn't satisfy BD's fast growing demand, the country has 2nd largest garment industry in the world. While Sonadia, a full-fledged deep-sea port of strategic importance, is pending discussion with China (issues like environmental are yet to be addressed), the fast tracking Matarbari port as a coal-handling hub will help boost immediate electricity production capacity. On top of deep pocket and port construction tech, Japan has leading tech in coal-fired powerplant and hence is an excellent partner on Matarbari. Now that with addition of Japan, Bangladesh infra will accelerate!
  • Is a good news for Japan winning this Matarbari port project, that's a promising long-term business, strategically positioned to help secure Japan's trading routes. Good score for team Japan!
Since China is being mentioned in a Japan-Bangladesh deal, I might as well comment more on the topic.
  • China was mentioned in a way typically found among western media like Bloomberg i.e. hate, anyway that doesn't matter. China will continue friendship and business with BD, existing co-operations will carry on, new projects will be actively pursued, well this they can't change, can they? Now this matters.
  • I have noticed your "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" series of threads, very well written bro! Will you publish a book on that? On Bangladesh, like I said earlier in other threads, China is anticipating more fierce competition from Japan.
  • Similarly China will face increased Japanese competition in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, though China might have some advantages, say early mover advantage in SL and MM, SCO/Eurasian integration of PK. Japan has a clear upperhand in India with "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" campaign, China isn't likely to get much involved there from the very beginning.
  • In other regions both are also competing, say ASEAN, Central-Asian stans, Sub-Saharan Africa, MENA, Latin America and CEE.
  • To summarize the above, in the area of infra export & investment, China sees Japan as a powerful competitor not just in BD but on a global vision. Well this game is a bit more humane than selling arms or mind drugs isn't it? Team China will score some, so is team Japan (JICA, Sumitomo, Kawasaki, Hitachi, ...), the recipient countries/regions always benefit, what a good sports bro!
Looks like competition is fierce in some neutral countries as you say, but some countries like Vietnam, India and Philippines will definitely go "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" !!
@Bussard Ramjet
 
.
Looks like competition is fierce in some neutral countries as you say, but some countries like Vietnam, India and Philippines will definitely go "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" !!


Yes, these 3 countries will be within sphere of the Rising Sun.

Note Japan is world's 3rd largest economy, has 2nd largest forex reserve, and has been 1st largest creditor nation for past 22 years in a row, home to 57 Fortune-500 companies, has immense tech, industrial, financial and trade capacities, making team Japan a powerful competitor.

Globally speaking China is largest trading partner for over 124 countries, almost all are neutral or friendly, and should focus trade/invest on them, not these three.
 
Last edited:
.
Looks like competition is fierce in some neutral countries as you say, but some countries like Vietnam, India and Philippines will definitely go "Into the Arms of the Rising Sun" !!
@Bussard Ramjet

Its all about balance in the end, Andrew. As you may know even countries that are aligned with Japan such as the Philippines and Vietnam , Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia and Indonesia --- do enjoy a vibrant and robust trade relationship with the Chinese People's Republic , and have maintained a pragmatist focus in their individual foreign policy.

These countries see the advantage in tapping into both Japan and China, remember that these countries have been members of the Japan-led (and $350 Billion capacity) Asian Development Bank, are cooperating with Japan through the ASEAN+Japan framework, cooperating with Japan through the Tokyo-Mekong Community Plan , and other Japan-centered strategic processes.

Yet at the same time, these said countries also maintain a pragmatic and developmental relationship with China through the AIIB, the ASEAN+China framework, the China FTA relationships and even defense articulation agreements. This is an example, Andrew, of the mutuality , multidimensionality of these countries in how they engage with not only Japan, but with China, with South Korea, with the United States, with the European Union , with India et al.

You see, it is not as basilar , as basic as "us vs them" paradigm focus, rather, this relationship is a complex comprehensive system that is ever-progressing and ever-changing. The relationship between nations, like human to human interaction, is influenced by various factors in the environment.



Regards,
@Nihonjin1051
 
.
. .
It's natural competition, so I shouldn't be worried, eh? :angel: :agree:

Well, true, as i said before , Japan is the only Asian country who can best/compete with china in ALL FIELDS and do even more. They have the financial and technological might to do it all.
To be honest, i cant imagine how things would look like for us if the two countries were allies. :sick:
 
.
I see a whole lot of talk about a port that hasn't even been built yet.

Besides, it's small potatoes compared to Gwadar and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor in terms of strategic importance.

View attachment 233521


I don't think the two projects are either in competition with each other or comparable.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom