What's new

INS Arihant : Updates & Discussion

Post-accident, lens on nuclear submarine projects

upload_2014-3-10_10-49-42.jpeg


Questions till now were being raised on the lack of proper quality controls, safety audits, accountability and monitoring during construction and refit of conventional warships and submarines after a series of accidents over the last several months. But now, even the construction of nuclear “platforms” is under the scanner.

Both the defence ministry and DRDO downplayed Saturday’s accident at the secretive and well-guarded Ship Building Centre (SBC) at Visakhapatnam, where India’s first three nuclear submarines are being built. “The accident is in no way related to any nuclear-related activity. The submarines are safe and the accident does not adversely affect the project,” the defence ministry said on Sunday.

That may well be the case but even minor accidents connected to the nuclear arena can raise the spectre of nightmarish scenarios. “The level of quality checks and technical oversight has to be much, much higher and stringent for nuclear platforms. A proper inquiry and safety audit is needed in the matter,” said an officer.

A civilian worker of Larsen & Toubro was killed and another two injured when the hatch of a “tank” to be installed in INS Aridhaman — the follow-on submarine to the first one, INS Arihant — blew off during its “hydro-pressure testing” in building number 5 of the SBC on Saturday. “It would have been catastrophic if it had happened inside the submarine,” said the officer.

The accident comes at a time when the “hull and full form” of INS Aridhaman, designated ‘S-3′ at present, is ready for “launch” into water. It will also be powered by a miniature 83 mw pressurized light-water reactor like the 6,000-tonne INS Arihant (S-2), whose enriched uranium-fuelled reactor went “critical” on August 10 last year.

The first PWR reactor designed for indigenous nuclear submarines, dubbed S-1, is located at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre at Kalpakkam as a prototype. A third submarine called S-4 is also being built under the secret advanced technology vessel (ATV) project underway with an initial sanction of around Rs 30,000 crore at the SBC.

The long delay in the sea-acceptance trials of INS Arihant, which was “launched” in July 2009, has itself raised eyebrows. The explanation is that since the submarine’s reactor went critical last August, its self-sustained power was being gradually raised by 5 per cent to 10 per cent at a time in a deliberate and calibrated manner.

“The pipelines are extensively pressure-tested every time … the leaks detected in the secondary and tertiary systems of the power plant are then rectified. INS Arihant will head for sea trials, which will take around 18 months and include firing of its K-15 ballistic missiles (750km range), only after its reactor achieves 100 per cent power,” said another officer.

INS Arihant’s fully operational status is critical to completing India’s long-standing quest for a nuclear weapons triad – the capability to fire nukes from land, air and underwater. But it will become a reality only sometime next year. Till then, India will have to make do with the land-based Agni missiles and fighters jury-rigged to carry nuclear weapons for its deterrence posture.

Post-accident, lens on nuclear submarine projects | idrw.org
 
. . .
AK Antony asks DRDO, Navy to ensure safety in nuclear assets

219711-ak-antony.jpg


Defence Minister AK Antony has asked the Navy and the DRDO to maintain highest safety standards in the nuclear submarine fleet of the country after the mishap at the site of an under-construction vessel at Vishakhapatnam in which one person was killed.

He has also asked the Department of Defence Production to review the safety standards in all the defence PSUs and shipyards after a mishap late last week in which a commander-rank officer was killed and two people were hospitalised in the Mazagon Docks, Defence Ministry officials said.

The Defence Minister talked to DRDO chief Avinash Chander and Navy’s acting chief Vice Admiral Robin Dhowan on the issue and asked them to ensure observance of Standard Operating Procedures and maintenance of safety standards, they said.

After the mishap at the facility in Eastern Naval Command to build follow-up submarines of the Arihant Class, the DRDO has ordered an inquiry into the incident and asked authorities including the contractors to observe highest safety standards and adhere to the SOPs, they said.

Though the incident did not have any direct impact on the nuclear submarine programme, government has taken it very seriously as it involved nuclear assets, officials said.

The safety departments in the submarines and their construction shipyards are also to be reviewed and strengthened after the mishap, they said.

Meanwhile, after the minister’s instructions, the Department of Defence Production has issued a letter to all the DPSUs, shipyards and Ordnance Factories to review their safety standards and safety structure departments, they said.

The Ministry has also asked the production units under it to review their safety practices and come up with a safety manual for its workers and officials and ensure strict adherence to it

AK Antony asks DRDO, Navy to ensure safety in nuclear assets | idrw.org
 
. . . . . . .
India's Sub-Building Facility May Suffer From Loose Admin Controls, Excessive Outsourcing

NEW DELHI — Even as Indian authorities are saying that the March accident at the building facility of the country’s homemade nuclear submarines was “an industrial accident,” sources in the Indian Navy said lack of a well spelled-out administrative command between different wings at Defense Research Development Organization (DRDO’s) Ship Building Centre (SBC) at Visakhapatnam is leading to poor monitoring of a variety of jobs, the bulk of which are being contracted and later subcontracted.

An employee of domestic, private-sector Larsen & Toubro (L&T) was killed when the lid of a pressure tank to be installed on a follow-up nuclear submarine of the Arihant class, code named S-3, blew off at the facility.

A statement by the Indian Ministry of Defense (MoD) later said, “The accident is in no way related with any nuclear-related activity. The submarines are safe, and the accident does not adversely affect the project activities or the activities of Indian Navy or Defense Research and Development Organization.”

DRDO chief Avinash Chander said mishap was an “industrial accident.” Talking to reporters March 10, he said, “What happened at Visakhapatnam has nothing to do with the Navy. It was an industrial accident.” Other officials at DRDO would not elaborate on what the DRDO chief meant by “industrial accident”.

The Indian Navy source, however, said, “Had a similar accident occurred at any private-sector shipbuilding facility, then the blame would have been put squarely on the private company, implying DRDO should own up to responsibility for the accident, as it involves the nuclear submarine.”

When asked about the administrative setup at the facility, a DRDO official said administrative control of DRDO lies with the Department of Research (R&D) in the Ministry of Defense which is headed by Chander, the scientific advisor to the defense minister who is also the director general of DRDO.

A MoD official denied any confusion in the administrative set up of the DRDO submarine building facility, adding that the nuclear submarine building project named Akansha is being executed by DRDO. However, a MoD source said the prime minister’s office is in charge of the submarine building project.

Since the indigenous nuclear submarine building project, earlier called the Advanced Technology Vehicle (ATV), is labeled secretive, no details are officially known on the definite administrative structure of the project.

DRDO’s nuclear submarine shipbuilding facility at Visakhapatnam was set up 10 years ago and has about 500 DRDO personnel, while the Indian Navy has another 500 personnel there, whose composition is not known.

While the Indian Navy is in charge of operational matters, DRDO is the integrator of the systems and sub-systems acquired from private sources, and its laboratories.

L&T built the hull at the facility, and several other private companies are involved in the project including Tata Power, Walchandnagar Industries and KSB Pumps.

Whatever the explanation given now by authorities to lay blame for the accident, analysts and Indian Navy officials are angry as the accident occurred as part of a string of incidents involving the Indian Navy. Last month, an officer of the Indian Navy died in the Russian-made submarine Sindhuratna, which led to the resignation of Indian Navy Chief Adm. D.K. Joshi. Last year, another Russian-made kilo-class submarine, Sindhurakshak, which had recently been upgraded, was lost in a fire, killing its 18 crewman.

“The approach at defense production facilities can be called careless, and it is time private-sector companies are directly involved in production of weapons and equipment so that the monopoly of state-owned companies which is bogged with bureaucracy is broken,” said defense analyst Nitin Mehta.

India's Sub-Building Facility May Suffer From Loose Admin Controls, Excessive Outsourcing | Defense News | defensenews.com
 
. . . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom