What's new

INS Arihant And Regional Stability – Analysis

It is natural then that Pakistan will try to counter the balance as well. This, however, seems to be more in the upcoming decade and thus will probably see the Pakistani defence strategy focus in on naval power. Let's see how the immediate effects take place as the new chief of navy comes later this year.
 
.
It is natural then that Pakistan will try to counter the balance as well. This, however, seems to be more in the upcoming decade and thus will probably see the Pakistani defence strategy focus in on naval power. Let's see how the immediate effects take place as the new chief of navy comes later this year.

that would mean PN would have to be give the baton to spearhead national defense. Thats a strict no no for Army/Intelligence
 
.
that would mean PN would have to be give the baton to spearhead national defense. Thats a strict no no for Army/Intelligence

Not necessarily, sir, the PAF developed in terms of quality due to her first Pakistani chief but the first Naval chief resigned due to differeces with the then President about the posture of the Pak Navy. However, it is now arising once again as the military learns grander strategy. Rest asured something will be put to the battlefield.
 
. . . .
So is there any possibility that IN will now look towards on N-Submarines like USN and leave SSKs for ever...

nope..SSK and SSN/SSBN will work along,as the use of these two types are in different sectors..
 
. .
chinese maal is better than Sindhughosh-class submarine

China bought the same subs at the same time bro..its the same kilos with identical configuration..don't troll..

why 2-3 decades
Type 096 submarine and Type 095 submarine are ready in chinese navy
we already have technology to build agosta 90b so near 2020 1st sub will be induct

but Pakistan didn't make any of Agosta-90,right??plus,how pakistan got the tech??its didn't come with TOT,right??and PLAN has nuclear subs for decades now..whats new??but does Pakistan has the money(around the same money of buying an advanced Frigate,more or less around $500 mil-$1 bill,going by the Indo-Russia deal..cost of a Frigate Shivalik,not F-22P)/need of a Nuclear Subs??SSk is more applicable to PN..
 
.
India has made another step in seemingly inexorable military rise on the technological crutches provided by the Russians in nuclear submarine technology. This deployment of the nuclear-powered submarines can have serious consequences for the strategic stability of the region.

As India is the world’s top importer of major conventional weapons and plans to spend over USD 100 billion in this sector in next 5-10 years. For year 2013-2014, there has been a 5.3% increase in the Indian defense budget. Previously, an increase of more than 17% in the defense budget (year 2012-2013) has been recorded with an allocation of USD 40.44 billion in this sector.

This prevalent economic equation obviously facilitates India to shift the balance of power in its favor thereby not only provoking Pakistan to respond in kind but would also start affecting the threat calculus of other nuclear powers.

With the induction of the nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) INS Arihant and future plans of adding three more indigenously-built SSBNs to India’s naval forces by 2025, New Delhi is posturing to instigate a strategic shift in the Indian Ocean and even beyond.

The induction of the Arihant would be destabilizing because it will increase its tendency to pre-empt a nuclear attack. Though India has a so-called nuclear first use pledge, it does not take similar Chinese policy as credible.

Likewise, its strategy of fighting a conventional war under nuclear overhang is tantamount to provoke Pakistan to nuclear response and negates the essence of NFU policy that New Delhi tries to sell. Its ballistic missile defense plan would also increase its proclivity to risk taking because India will have this false sense of security against ballistic missiles that it may feel ‘confident’ to destroy in their flight path.

Indian Navy’s long term acquisition plans include three SSBN and six SSN submarines will affect the strategic equilibrium between India and Pakistan. Indian Navy is on a massive surge plan to construct a blue water flotilla. Its massive development plans include the acquirement of both indigenous and leased nuclear powered submarines and various other platforms capable of launching nuclear weapons i.e. delivering nuclear weapons from the air, surface and sub-surface thus confirming its second strike capability.

The Indian Navys other acquisitions include the aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov, renamed as INS Vikramaditya with 16 MiG-29K/KUBs and 6 to 8 Ka-31 AEW helicopters. India is also constructing 3 Indigenous Aircraft Carriers for the IN. It also plans to construct 3 destroyers of Kolkata class and Guided Missile Frigate’s, four ASW Corvettes, four 4 Saryu class Operational Patrol Vessels, four Landing Platform Docks, and acquire two Osprey Class Mine Hunters and eight P8-I Long Range Maritime Patrol Aircraft from USA, besides developing additional strategic naval bases. These developments will further destabilize the strategic stability of the region.

INS Arihant And Regional Stability - Analysis Eurasia Review

India plans to have 5 SSBNs, at least.

First 3 SSBNs (Arihant class) wont be able to house K-4 missiles

Only follow on submarine to Arihant Class(with displacement of 10,500 to 12,800 Tons) can house K-4 missiles (weighing 18 To 20 Tons).
 
.
India plans to have 5 SSBNs, at least.

First 3 SSBNs (Arihant class) wont be able to house K-4 missiles

Only follow on submarine to Arihant Class(with displacement of 10,500 to 12,800 Tons) can house K-4 missiles (weighing 18 To 20 Tons).

But reports said that it can carry either 12 K15 or 4 K4 ???
 
. . . . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom