Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nvm , they're only available 2026 onwards ....
View attachment 680826
Don't use tiger to take care lion problem, you may end up having lion and tiger problem, get yourself a fully loaded shotgun.
There is always Nigerian , Pakistan and India to fill the blanks, they keep pump up babies like no tomorrow. Even Indonesia people family nowadays is more wary to have Children more than one or two
To have a good shotgun you need to found a good vendor, the problem is the vendor is either the friend of the Tiger or Lion in the first place!!! If you want to developing your own shotgun you need time and time is not our friend nowadays!!!
Aah ... The legendary adage of Seeing is believing .
There is also interest among Indonesian defense establishments in F-15 Eagle heavy jet fighters and even the stealthy F-35 Lightning II jet fighter.US, Indonesia agree to enhance military, maritime security ties
Esper and Prabowo discussed regional security, bilateral defense priorities and defense acquisitions, the United States Department of Defense said in a statement issued on Oct. 16.www.thejakartapost.com
if US too "mendikte" in F35 operational, how about F15x?
Is it the same case?
If we choose full Rafale, is it become less possible for us to get JSF in the future?
That's not a bad idea.This is what i've kinda been saying the past year, we start working on getting F-35's from now but only operate them by the late-2020's to 2030's especially now with the long backlog, even Singapore who got approved early this year for their purchase will only be receiving 4 of them in 2026. I mean it makes more sense to go with the F-16V since its a platform we're already familiar with but is just a more advanced version of it and buying F-16V means its can share the same armaments and sub-components stock from our existing F-16's and possible future F-35's (US advanced fighter), also the F-16V is still relevant for the next 1-2 decades since it has 4.5 gen avionics.
But if we have more money, I would argue we get both. Get both the F-16V and Rafale as our 4.5 gen stopgap for the 2020's, the F-16V can provide us with a familiar but more advanced platform that can improve our sortie rates and giving us experience with more advanced systems such as AESA radar and EW suites and meanwhile the Rafale can provide us with the diversification that we've been having with our Flanker fleet since French armaments and products stands out a bit differently from their NATO counterparts and they're more loose when it comes to embargo (remember, during East Timor crisis they only enforced the sanction for less than a year), the Rafale also has AESA and advanced EW suites in the form of the RBE-2AA and SPECTRA.
Also, having both F-16V and Rafale might provide us with a pathway to both the F-35 and the 6th gen Airbus FCAS.
That's not a bad idea.
How about selling our flanker?
Pros cons?
Wouldn't work, cost of introducing a platform such as the Rafale is going to eat up a ton of budget until it reaches IOC/FOC.Better to use them as it is, until retired time. They can be used for several roles including bomb Trucks.
Better to use them as it is, until retired time. They can be used for several roles including bomb Trucks.
It seems Procuring Rafale or Typhoon would be a dead sentence for our Flankers.Better to use them as it is, until retired time. They can be used for several roles including bomb Trucks.
I doubt we would be able to afford a costly US-Russian-French ecosystem, we're not Egypt and we shouldn't follow Egypt either