Indonesia Defence Forum

[Indos]

Navy probing M’sian border violation
Yuliasri Perdani, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | World | Wed, May 21 2014, 12:30 PM

The Navy is continuing investigations into the possibility that the installation by Malaysia of a light beacon on Tanjung Datuk Island is in violation of Indonesian sovereignty.

However, such investigations would have to take into account the unresolved issue of a 1970 bilateral treaty that the House of Representatives (DPR) did not ratify, an expert on international law has said.

Tanjung Datuk lies on the border between Paloh district in Sambas regency, West Kalimantan, and the Malaysian state of Sarawak. The area includes the sand ridge of Gosong Niger in the sea and Camar Wulan on the main island.

Navy chief of staff Adm. Marsetio confirmed to The Jakarta Post that the Pontianak Naval Base had received a report about the possible border violation from the Navigation District Office in Pontianak.

“We have sent a warship to the island, and today [Tuesday] we sent an aircraft to take aerial photographs of the area,” he said on the sidelines of a maritime leadership conference in Jakarta, on Tuesday.

The construction of the beacon on Tanjung Datuk follows a previous border spat with Malaysia over the Ambalat bloc in the Sulawesi Sea.

Marsetio explained that part of the reason why they were still gathering data was because each country had their own perception of the maritime borders. This made it unclear where exactly the border lay.

“[Our investigations] are not finished,” he said. The data will then be submitted to the Indonesian Military (TNI) chief Gen. Moeldoko and also to the Malaysian authorities.

Meanwhile, Navy chief spokesman Commodore Manahan Simorangkir confirmed on Tuesday that Malaysia had halted construction of the light beacon. “Our corvette reached the site and our officers asked them to halt the construction. On 19 May [Monday] at 6 p.m. they agreed to stop the work and go back to their side of the border,” he said in a telephone interview.

Separately, University of Indonesia (UI) international law expert Hikmahanto Juwana said that disagreements on the 1970 sea boundary treaty were at the root of the problem.

He told the Post that Malaysia assumed that the signing of the treaty meant that the borders were final. However, both the 1960 Presidential Letter 2826/HK/60 and Law No. 24/2000 on International Agreements stipulate that an international agreement must be ratified by the DPR to become valid.

“We still claim islands such as Tanjung Datuk because we assume that the treaty is not final because we have not ratified it,” he said.

Hikmahanto said that conflicting views on the subject existed within the government, making it difficult to decide on how to act next.

Spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, Michael Tene, said they were waiting for the TNI to finish verifying the information they received about the alleged violation before speaking to the Malaysian authorities.

“We cannot make contact with Malaysia yet without verifying the information,” he said. (fss)

Navy probing M’sian border violation | The Jakarta Post

They have already left the area................

 

[katarabhumi]

Rheinmetall to Supply the Indonesian Army With Leopard 2 Simulators
May 22, 2014

Indonesia has awarded Rheinmetall with an order for state-of-the-art simulation technology for training tank crews. By 2015 Rheinmetall will have produced a driving simulator and gunnery simulator for training Indonesian Leopard 2 personnel. The order is worth several million euros.

The Leopard Gunnery Skills Trainer (LGST) and Driver Training Simulator (DTS) are specifically designed for training Leopard 2A4 tank crews, and will primarily be used for sharpening the gunnery and combat skills of commanders, gunners, loaders and drivers.

Rheinmetall’s ultramodern TacSi technology features prominently in these simulators. Furthermore, as a leading supplier of defence technology systems, the Group is able to draw on its unsurpassed knowledge of the Leopard 2 and longstanding competence in the field of simulation, now coupled with the advantages offered by serious gaming technologies. As a result, Rheinmetall simulation products combine the virtues of the game engine in regard to visualization with the high-quality training outcomes its simulators assure.

A further advantage of the Rheinmetall system: several simulators can be networked to enable tactical training at platoon and company level. In terms of design, the simulators just ordered by Indonesia are similar to systems that have already proven highly effective in day-to-day military training operations.

For example, in recent years Rheinmetall has supplied the Canadian armed forces with a total of 18 gunnery simulators and two driver training simulators for Leopard 2 tank crews. All of these systems have been up and running since March 2014. These two contracts underscore once again the global trust placed in Rheinmetall’s simulation technology and Leopard 2 expertise.

Rheinmetall to Supply the Indonesian Army With Leopard 2 Simulators - Display Central

 

[MarveL]

Rheinmetall to Supply the Indonesian Army With Leopard 2 Simulators
May 22, 2014

Rheinmetall to Supply the Indonesian Army With Leopard 2 Simulators - Display Central

x tepek gambo pakcik?

 

[Dayax]

Indonesian Champion Earn AASAM 2014​

​

Indonesian contingent Return Becomes Champion shooter AASAM 2014Puckapunyal □ contingent Indonesia managed to become the overall champion in the Australian Army Competition Shooting Skills at Arms Meeting ( AASAM ) in 2014 with the acquisition of 32 gold medals , 15 silver medals and 20 bronze medals . In the arms race that year , the Army contingent overall winner by using several weapons production Pindad ( Persero ) .
In the shooting competition held on May 5 to 16 May 2014 in the Puckapunyal Military Area Victoria , Australia , the Indonesian contingent wearing several products produced by PT Pindad weapons ( Persero ) as an assault rifle SS2 - HB ( Heavy Barrel ) , Machine Gun SM - 2 , and SM - 3 , and G2 pistol Elite version . As with previous years , the Indonesian contingent to follow some material such as the material race individuals and teams , the number of rifles , pistols , automatic rifles ( SO ) and the combined material rifle and SO .In organizing AASAM 2014 , Indonesia had to face a team shot from 16 countries including Australia , Canada , France , Timor Leste , Brunei Darussalam , the United Kingdom, the U.S. Army , U.S. Navy , New Zealand , Singapore , Thailand , Japan , Philippines , Papua New Guinea , and Tonga . Good team performance and reliability of the shooters , supported by accurate weapons , making Indonesia outpacing rivals and become the overall champion , followed by Australia and Brunei in the second and third place .

Indonesian Army soldier 1st Sergeant H. Herlansyah is the Champion Shot – International for 2014. He was chaired to the award ceremony by his team at this year's Australian Army Skill at Arms Meeting. The award was presented by Regimental Sergeant Major – Army, Warrant Officer Dave Ashley.​

​

Indonesia managed to get a general title AASAM from 2008 to 2014 and of course , this is a matter of great pride for the nation . For PT Pindad ( Persero ) itself , this achievement is a proof that the weapons were manufactured have a good quality and high accuracy .

source: BUMN (pindad)

 

[MarveL]

Indonesia rejects 'military solution' to sea disputes
The South China Sea issue is a 'litmus test' for ASEAN, Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa tells Rappler's Maria Ressa

'LITMUS TEST.' Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa rejects a 'military solution' to the South China Sea issue. Screen grab from Rappler

MANILA, Philippines – Indonesia rejected a “military solution” to South China Sea disputes incidentally as recent tensions between China and Vietnam have triggered aggression, including riots and the use of a water cannon.

In an interview with Rappler's Maria Ressa, Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa also said the historic maritime deal between the Philippines and Indonesia, signed on Friday, May 23, provides a good example. (READ: Philippines, Indonesia seal historic maritime deal)

“We have to first of all recognize that there is no military solution to this issue. A military solution, whether use of force, threat of force, can only bring about a temporary solution or temporary gains to whoever feels that they have made gains,” Natalegawa said in an interview Thursday, May 22, on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum on East Asia.

“Because security is common goods,” he added. “It must be enjoyed by all. It cannot be at the expense of the other.” (Watch the full interview below)

Natalegawa explained: “That is why we have to promote peaceful settlement of disputes. It could be diplomacy, it could be negotiations, it could be legal processes. Anything as long as it is not the use of force. And I think our region must recognize that we've all been beneficiaries to the peace that we have long enjoyed.”

His statement came in the face of renewed tensions between China and Vietnam, after the rising superpower deployed an oil rig in the disputed South China Sea. (READ: Vietnam mulls 'legal actions' against China)

Vietnam said the Chinese ships protecting the deep-water drilling rig had used a water cannon to attack Vietnamese patrol vessels and repeatedly rammed them, injuring 6 people.

China, on the other hand, blamed Vietnam for encouraging the country's worst anti-Beijing riots in decades, in which one Chinese worker was killed.

'Very strong message'

The maritime boundary treaty signed on Friday provides – in the words of Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono – a “model” in border disputes.

Referring to the treaty that was 20 years in the making, Natalegawa said, “This is a very strong message to the rest of the region that it is not impossible to find a resolution to any overlapping territorial claims.”

He stressed the need for a “more positive momentum” in the region.

HISTORIC DEAL. Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa (left) and Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario (right) finish signing a historic maritime deal between their countries. Behind them, Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Philippine President Benigno Aquino III witness the signing. Photo by Rey Baniquet/PCOO/Malacañang Photo Bureau

“It's not a given that we are always in a state of a vicious cycle of tensions and mistrust. And Indonesia and the Philippines, working hand in hand, I think, can be part of that game-changing, momentum-building situation,” the Indonesian foreign minister said.

On the ties between ASEAN and China, Natalegawa said “we would like to develop a new type of international relations, where countries can unite not because of fear of another country.”

“We don't need a country to threaten, to bring us together.... When ASEAN comes together and unifies, it's not meant to be inimical to anyone. So China is a very strong, important partner to ASEAN, but it must actually deliver on the commitments,” he said.

'Litmus test' for ASEAN

One of these commitments, he noted, is the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) that the Philippines, Indonesia, and China, among others, signed in 2002.

The non-binding DOC states: “The parties concerned undertake to resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by peaceful means, without resorting to the threat or use of force, through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned, in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.”

Natalegawa aid, “It's a crossroads of a sort we are now facing, but all of us must contribute to overcoming those challenges and opportunities.”

The South China Sea issue, he said, is “a litmus test for ASEAN.”

Indonesia rejects 'military solution' to sea disputes

 

[Indos]

Indonesian Champion Earn AASAM 2014​

​

..................ALWAYS WIN SINCE 2008

 

[Indos]

I hope we will be launching our RX 550 rocket as soon as possible, based on recent LAPAN plan the schedule is in 2015

RX-550 rocket

RX-750 rocket (still a design I believe)

RPS-420 Conceptual Design Satellite Launcher Vehicle

 

[Nike]

Photo bonus credit to mbah Suromenggolo di Kaskus.co.id

 

[MarveL]

original article in Bahasa.


Indonesia-Russia Rocket Launch Cooperation

Russia, Indonesia, and Germany wanted to work together launched Polet, a two-level carrier rocket weighs 100 tons.

Rockets that are part of the Air Launch project will be launched from Biak , Papua . Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation stated Aleskey Likhachev currently coordinating base in Papua has been implemented and project finance negotiations underway . It was stated Likhachev during a visit to Jakarta in March , while leading Russian business delegation visit to ASEAN countries . According to Likhachev , Air Launch project implementation in Indonesia does not run too fast , but Russia hopes the project is important for both countries can be realized immediately . "

Do not rule out the scope of the project will involve greater cooperation between Russia and the ASEAN countries , " said Likhachev . Sergey Teselkin meeting in Jakarta . Polet not be launched from the surface of the earth , but from a height of ten kilometers above sea level . The rocket will be transported by Ruslan , the largest aircraft in the world , and then will be launched when the plane was airborne . It will reduce the cost of launching up to two times lower . Satellite launch will be conducted on the island of Biak , Papua , which is only two degrees angle from the equator .

With a rotation speed of 0.4 kilometers per second earth , the satellite into orbit delivery costs become cheaper , because the rotation of the earth itself that will propel the satellite into orbit . Air Launch Teleskin states can serve as an emergency response system . " Imagine when astronomers discovered an asteroid which come closer to the earth without warning , Air Launch ( if the infrastructure is already built and is armed with rockets ) may be the only system that can cope with the threat. This system would destroy the asteroid to pieces in about five days after the discovery , "said Teleskin In addition , the system offers a revolutionary Teleskin in this project .

Typically , before the launch of the satellite was brought into cosmodrome ( rocket launching station ) and maintained at all times , but do not rule out the possibility of leakage of technology . Meanwhile , Polet will be brought ( by plane ) to the client by using a rocket upper stage and the assembly is done under the full control of the client . Water Technology Launch is owned by the State Rocket Center ( PRN ) Russian Makeyev who have engaged in rocket armament market for 60 years , and decades of experience in the field of rocket technology from submarines .

Teleskin explained , proprietary technology PRN very useful in facilitating the launch of a rocket . " The rocket weighing 100 tonnes that jump out of planes , with a total weight of 400 tons , will make specific damage on the dynamics of flight . Air Launch launch a weight that makes the air easier than releasing bubbles in the hydrosphere , "said Teleskin . An - 124 Ruslan aircraft itself is designed to deploy a very heavy burden . Teleskin optimistic that this project is able to attract the attention of investors . " All the investors we met advised to conduct trials rocket launch . If we manage to do so , the investor will assess this project is different from the previous .

Observers experts from Russia , Europe , the U.S. and even predict many potential clients who will queue up to invest , " said Teleskin . This project has been submitted to the Russian government , but Teleskin worry reorganization Russian Space Agency Roskosmos leadership will hinder smooth project . " The decision has been received , but the new project should be carried out after the formation of the new structure of Roskosmos . So we still have to wait to make it happen . In order not to waste time in vain , we continue our work with partners from Indonesia and Germany . "Said Teleskin .

Indonesia-Rusia Akan Kerja Sama Luncurkan Roket | RBTH Indonesia

 

[Nike]

Will Indonesia’s new president reshape its future strategic policy?
21May 2014
By Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto
Print This Post




As Indonesia prepares for the presidential election in July, one of the big questions concerns defence and security: in particular, to what extent will Indonesia’s new president reshape Indonesia’s future strategic policy? Here, I’m not going to debate what ‘strategy’ or ‘strategic policy’ [PDF] is. Rather, I want to provide an answer to the question outlined above. Drawing fromKenneth Waltz’s theoretical analysis, I’ll explore those factors shaping Indonesian strategic thinking at the international, regional, national, sub-national (domestic), and individual (personal) levels.

At the international level, the big question is obviously where Indonesia stands in relation to the more intense geopolitical competition unfolding between China and the US—with China potentially drawing increased support from Russia and US allies supporting its rebalancing to Asia. While Washington has consistently said that its rebalancing strategy is anything but containment, China is increasingly sceptical about such claims. Caught in between, Indonesia seems to know better what it stands against than what it stands for.

For instance, Jakarta’s initial reaction to the announcement of the US Marines deployment in Darwin was revealing—suspicious at best and conspiratorial at worst. But it’s also worried that China might be bent on changing the status quo and undermining America’s stabilising presence in the region. While ‘hedging’ can aptly describe such an attitude, it seems at the moment Indonesia is more intent on dodging a critical strategic question that it must answer sooner rather than later.

In its hedging strategy [PDF], Jakarta puts a lot of diplomatic (and emotional) investment into ASEAN at the regional level. It sees the grouping as a cushion against the potentially bruising impact of major power competition. The ASEAN-centric architecture has evolved into three supra-regional institutions (the ASEAN Regional Forum, the East Asia Summit, and the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus), each expected to tie the major powers into regional norms and institution-building efforts, and mitigate their predatory power-politics behaviours. The goal isn’t to avoid competition—some is inevitable—but to prevent competition sliding into conflict.

But, has that approach been successful? One measure of success is ASEAN’s unity andcentrality, with Indonesia at its bedrock. ASEAN has been the ‘cornerstone’ of Indonesia’s foreign policy and will remain so. But the importance Jakarta accords to ASEAN is nuanced from time to time. And the utility of ASEAN to further Indonesia’s regional interests has its limits, as demonstrated in the 2012 ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting. Moreover, ASEAN hasn’t really succeeded in diluting escalating major power rivalries in Asia. And Indonesia itself, well on its way to becoming a major power, might be surreptitiously engaged in a strategic competition that it has been trying to avoid.

A growing regional profile means little, however, if it doesn’t align with Indonesia’s national interests at the national level. The history of Indonesia’s use of force beyond its national borders fromKonfrontasi to East Timor has demonstrated that regionalism doesn’t trump nationalism and national interests. Growing concerns over its increasingly unstable strategic environment led Jakarta to come up with unilateral initiatives, such as the concept of dynamic equilibrium and theIndo-Pacific Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation [PDF]. At the heart of the matter are the South China Sea disputes. While those are largely confined to Indonesia’s far north, they’ve prodded Indonesia to become more diplomatically and militarily assertive.

Seen in this light, a critical question is whether Indonesia would abandon the non-alignment stanceas embodied in its free and active (bebas aktif) foreign policy. Growing competition between major powers could undermine Indonesia’s non-alignment stance. But being strictly non-aligned [PDF] wouldn’t be in Indonesia’s best interest either. Interestingly, bebas aktif can be defined more loosely and flexibly. While a formal alliance is absolutely out of the question, anything short of it is possible. That allows Indonesia to build a set of bilateral defence and military relationships with partner countries that differ in both quantity and quality, as best suits Indonesia’s interests.

The manoeuvring room in constructing those relationships isn’t great, not least because it’s contingent upon factors at the sub-national or domestic level. In democracies, all politics, includinginternational politics, is domestic. Democracy allows more voices from within Indonesia to be heard, with nationalism and Islam being two dominant ones. As can be seen from Indonesia’s recent election campaigns, both are laden with anti-Western sentiment, which militates againstIndonesia’s becoming too close to the West. That factor is sometimes aggravated by intense bureaucratic politics and turf battles. The TNI and the Foreign and Defence Ministries harbourdifferent views on Indonesia’s strategic policy, which may or may not be bridged.

This is where the personal role of a ‘strategic’ individual, such as the President, can be important. It’s the responsibility of political leaders to lead domestic opinion and the bureaucracy in favour of what he or she thinks would be in the country’s best interest. While heads of state are certainly opinion-makers, they’re not necessarily opinion-leaders. The challenge of shaping and leading domestic opinion is greater in a democratic Indonesia than it was in New Order days. Strategically sensible policies might not always be accepted domestically.

Still, Indonesia’s strategic policy is one of the major challenges that await Indonesia’s next president. And that’s why the July presidential election matters—not only to Indonesians, but equally, to the region and beyond.

Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto is an Indonesian visiting fellow at ASPI. Image courtesy of Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Will Indonesia’s new president reshape its future strategic policy? | The Strategist

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Has Pakistan And Indonesia ever co-operated in military in purchasing weapons, Research and Development and Training in present past or in future maybe?

 

[Nike]

Has Pakistan And Indonesia ever co-operated in military in purchasing weapons, Research and Development and Training in present past or in future maybe?

In the past Indonesia and Pakistan has a close cooperation in Military sector. We had sending ten thousands of small arms and hundred tons of munition (including our stock of old BM-14 MLRS and RPG-2) to Afghanistan fighter via Pakistan armed forces and intelligent agencies back in the midst of Sovyet invasion of Aghan in 80's. In 65, in the midst of Indo-Pakistani war, Indonesia send a Naval Fleet Group trying to threaten India foothold in Andaman and Nicobar. And in recent times, we had some cooperation in military cooperation, but i think the level has been further degraded from the past because both countries has their own issues and playing ground. Indonesia is busy in ASEAN regional forum and Pasific Nations forum such as APEC (with member like South Korea, USA, Japan, Russia, PRC, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippine and so on), meanwhile Pakistani more inclined toward PRC and middle east countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE and Turkey.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

In the past Indonesia and Pakistan has a close cooperation in Military sector. We had sending ten thousands of small arms and hundred tons of munition (including our stock of old BM-14 MLRS and RPG-2) to Afghanistan fighter via Pakistan armed forces and intelligent agencies back in the midst of Sovyet invasion of Aghan in 80's. In 65, in the midst of Indo-Pakistani war, Indonesia send a Naval Fleet Group trying to threaten India foothold in Andaman and Nicobar. And in recent times, we had some cooperation in military cooperation, but i think the level has been further degraded from the past because both countries has their own issues and playing ground. Indonesia is busy in ASEAN regional forum and Pasific Nations forum such as APEC (with member like South Korea, USA, Japan, Russia, PRC, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippine and so on), meanwhile Pakistani more inclined toward PRC and middle east countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE and Turkey.

And thats good isnt it? now a days nations r inclining more towards regional politics and its good to see indonesia also following that path and are more focused on it.
I have observed a tremendous good will b/w the people of two countries and we must work together on our mutual interests and strengthen our bond. We have a lot of cultural and moral similarities as both are big Muslim countries.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

RI-France Agrees to Build Propellant Factory

One more good news for the domestic defense industry. ARC received the news, already signed MoU for the construction of the propellant plant between PT.Dahana with Roxel Eurenco of France. The announcement of cooperation itself will be announced by the Ministry of Defence in the very near future.

(Illustration, RHan launching, Photo: Kemhan)

In this cooperation, all parties agreed to build a propellant plant in Subang, West Java region. The factory covering an area of 50 ha will be built in the area of PT. Dahana and will take over 4 years of development. Hopefully, the first breaking ground national propellant plant will take place before the anniversary of the TNI on October the fifth.Products generated will be absorbed by the defense industry, particularly raw material for making bullets, rockets and missiles.

Roxel propellant itself is a well-known producer of French origin. Almost all rockets and missiles made in Western Europe using artificial Roxel propellant. Among the Exocet family, Mistral, Rapier, until RBS-15 and others. Reportedly also, experienced Roxel Special Caliber Ammunition propellant supply for PT.Pindad

(Graphic: Roxel)

While Eurenco is a company which develops, manufactures and provides a variety of energetic materials for defense and commercial markets. Includes stuffing material for propellant and warhead cannons, anti-tank missiles and up.

Independence efforts in the area of the propellant itself is one of the main programs in KKIP. Propellant industry is one of the strategic industries towards self-reliance in the field of rocket and Missile. So the future goals of rockets and national missile is now getting closer to reality.

1. Development of KF-X/IF-X Fighter Jets.
2. Creation of Submrines.
3. Building of Propellant Industry.
4. Development of National Rockets.
5. Development of National Missiles.
6. Development of National Radar.
7. Development of Medium Tank.

RI-Prancis Bangun Pabrik Propelan

 

[Indos]

RI-France Agrees to Build Propellant Factory

One more good news for the domestic defense industry. ARC received the news, already signed MoU for the construction of the propellant plant between PT.Dahana with Roxel Eurenco of France. The announcement of cooperation itself will be announced by the Ministry of Defence in the very near future.

(Illustration, RHan launching, Photo: Kemhan)

In this cooperation, all parties agreed to build a propellant plant in Subang, West Java region. The factory covering an area of 50 ha will be built in the area of PT. Dahana and will take over 4 years of development. Hopefully, the first breaking ground national propellant plant will take place before the anniversary of the TNI on October the fifth.Products generated will be absorbed by the defense industry, particularly raw material for making bullets, rockets and missiles.

Roxel propellant itself is a well-known producer of French origin. Almost all rockets and missiles made in Western Europe using artificial Roxel propellant. Among the Exocet family, Mistral, Rapier, until RBS-15 and others. Reportedly also, experienced Roxel Special Caliber Ammunition propellant supply for PT.Pindad

(Graphic: Roxel)

While Eurenco is a company which develops, manufactures and provides a variety of energetic materials for defense and commercial markets. Includes stuffing material for propellant and warhead cannons, anti-tank missiles and up.

Independence efforts in the area of the propellant itself is one of the main programs in KKIP. Propellant industry is one of the strategic industries towards self-reliance in the field of rocket and Missile. So the future goals of rockets and national missile is now getting closer to reality.

1. Development of KF-X/IF-X Fighter Jets.
2. Creation of Submrines.
3. Building of Propellant Industry.
4. Development of National Rockets.
5. Development of National Missiles.
6. Development of National Radar.
7. Development of Medium Tank.

RI-Prancis Bangun Pabrik Propelan

It is huge............