Urdu is marvel of
PakCivilisation...which is in itself
The Synthesis of the entire IslamicWorld.... so in essence Urdu is the
Language of
Muslims.... a
proto UnifiedLanguage of the
IslamicWorld.
From music to architecture ...from cloths to cusines... we brought
Civilisation to
Hindustan.
Even the word Hindu is Ours....
The Heartland Pakistan is the inheritor of the
Synthesis of at least
1000 years...and before that many mellania @Rafeh
Sanskrit is Ours....
Any Pakistani can speak Urdu .... and with a bit of education good Urdu... since it is
OurNaturalLanuage.
So this is insulting to even have a thread that classifies
OurLanguage to be Gangu.... and that hindi is a bastard version of Urdu. Period.
The discussion must be more about
Urdu Dynamics,
it is ability to absorb anything and
Urdufy it... same as Pakistan... we
Pakistanify everything/everyone... that is
The Heartland!
Due to the presence of guests and other commitments I can’t write much but I will add the following.
Sanskrit is the language of Aryan people who arrived from Russian steppe and have largely nothing to do with the overwhelming majority of current Indian people. Whether they like it or not, accept it or not that is the reality. Majority of Indians are lower casts who have even by their own religious texts have nothing to do with “arya smajh”. Even higher casts largely do not have aryan genes.
Coming back, the only known truly large-scale Aryan settlements were established in Peshawar Valley, taxilla among other places in Punjab as well as northern areas in Kashmir. They also existed of course in Baluchistan. From Punjab these Aryans spread to Sindh.
ONLY a small number of priests settle down in India where they declared himself to be representative of various gods, a master race off course and started religious shrines and temples and where they enforced earlier versions of Sanskrit as the main religious language. They were largely fair in skin so that was probably basis of their rule. Overtime however these so called high casts started marrying/raping the local population and their future generation lost a lot of those aryan genes. Some high casts are made up that is whoever gets rich in india, moves to different area and declares themselves to be a “brahman” etc. (the so called fake high casts).
In short, daily forced use of Sanskrit gradually lead to Europeanization of the grammar of native Indian regional languages.
That is overwhelming majority of Indian people remain the same but only their language became Indo-Aryanized. In other words most Indians are native people of India speaking non-native versions of their earlier languages.
Some aryan derivatives such as Scythians, Kurdish people, Greek settlers etc, never even left Pakistan. Furthermore aryan Iranians continued to establish colonies and settlements on the other side of the Indus River both in Punjab, Sindh, and northern Pakistan/Kashmir etc. not to mention afghans being themselves related to Aryan people largely settled in places such as Multan, Kasur, Lahore etc, in other words Pakistan only.
The point is the only people who are the true owners of Sanskrit live in Pakistan, by large and by far. That's not a good thing either. There is NOTHING great about Sanskrit.
Of course Indian people are welcome to believe otherwise. Once again do note that haplogroup or ancestry testing has nothing to do with actual human genome.
In five or 10 years’ time frame, we will be able to have full human genome testing within our homes. That will definitely lead to the already obvious reality.
Which is while maybe 15% or so of Pakistanis may have some relationship to northern India, rest are collections of a large number of people outside of Pakistan, with having nothing to do at least racially with the vast majority of Indian people. Which makes no difference and should make no difference to indian identity. They themselves are mixture of difference races/ethnic groups.
In fact it would be seen that even within Pakistan most people are genetically distinct from each other. Though Pakistanis will still cluster closely together from genetic point of view.
The point is since urdu is is derived from Sanskrit as well as other aryan related languages such as Iranian, Pashto, Punjabi, sindhi (having their word roots)
among others, it’s a language that was imposed upon Indian people rather than something that naturally belongs to them. Yes modern Arabs themselves are Eurasian people with Aryan genes gained from both southern Europeans as well as aryan migration from central Asia. Even Turkish people of modern Turkey have largely aryan genetics.
Unfortunately a lot of such research is only available in Russian, French and other non-English languages. Such research is "free from indian biases" since they do not include indian authers. Anyone who has friends speaking these languages should jointly search and understand more about this topic. I read and learn so much my whole life through self study and through interacting with others with the aim to just understand one question: who are these Pakistani people. I can’t remember where I read what. I leave it up to you to do your own research or wait for the full human genome mapping technologies that will enable an individual to test their genes at home. Meantime its pretty clear that Sanskrit has as little to do with general Indian population as English has to do with Pakistan.
Though india can accept it as part of their religious affiliations.
Furthermore that Sanskrit itself is derivative of earlier indo-iranian languages and a mixture of other closely related iranic/central asian languages and later transformed into its present form due to mixing of various other speakers of related/not related languages as various people came into contact with each other.
Aryans themselves were a clusters of large number of different people from euroasian region.