What's new

Indigenous interceptor missile trial tomorrow

. .
Good Luck DRDO!

BTW anyone knows what difference this test would have from prev one, if any?



:lol:
From a news source:
We are trying to programme such a coordination that the PAD interceptor would destroy the incoming enemy missile at an altitude of nearly 150 km. During earlier PAD tests, the missile successfully intercepted the target missile at an altitude of 45 km and 80 km," a defence official said.

I think they call PAD as Prithvi defence vehicle (PDV). From Wiki:

The PDV is said to be a two solid stage hypersonic anti-ballistic missile similar in class to the THAAD. The PDV is intended to replace the existing PAD in the PAD/AAD combination. It will have an IIR seeker for its kill vehicle as well. The PDV will replace the PAD with a far more capable missile and will complete the Phase 1 of the BMD system, allowing it to be operational by 2013. Whereupon Phase 2 development will take over for protection against missiles of the 5,000 km (3,100 mi) range class.[28] The first test flight of the missile is expected in 2010.[29] The PDV is designed to take out the target missile at altitudes above 150 km (93 mi).
 
.
this is just a 50 years old tech. completely different from China's land based mid course interceptor.

to have any mid course interception, you need kkv technologies, so far india has almost zero knowledge in that area. Check on wikipedia to see what is KKV.

oh, don't feel sad, russia doesn't have the technology. there are only two nations can do it: the USA and China.

---------- Post added at 05:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------



nothing to show to the public. it is a 50 years old technology. China mastered it like 30-40 years ago.

Yes you are correct we have zero knowledge in stealing technology.

Please go through the link to see the achivement.

How China Steals U.S. Military Secrets - Popular Mechanics

Why China Has to Steal Technology


There is more ...let me know if you are intrested....very true China mastered it like 30-40 years ago...I believe long time before. :yahoo:
 
.
this is just a 50 years old tech. completely different from China's land based mid course interceptor.
to have any mid course interception, you need kkv technologies, so far india has almost zero knowledge in that area. Check on wikipedia to see what is KKV. oh, don't feel sad, russia doesn't have the technology. there are only two nations can do it: the USA and China.

hey peaceful, seems like ur IQ is less than 35, just like me.. Come on lets play knock knock
 
.
1.this is just a 50 years old tech. completely different from China's land based mid course interceptor.

2.to have any mid course interception, you need kkv technologies, so far india has almost zero knowledge in that area. Check on wikipedia to see what is KKV.

oh, don't feel sad, russia doesn't have the technology. there are only two nations can do it: the USA and China.



3.nothing to show to the public. it is a 50 years old technology. China mastered it like 30-40 years ago.


Ah, the same peaceful of the "India does not have wind tunnels" fame! :lol:


1. So, a two tiered terminal phase missile defence system with techs like gimballed directional warhead with P charge and with a combined hit probability of 99.8% was achieved 50 years back?:woot:.......................

.........Maybe on krypton!;)



2. Wrong! Kinetic kill vehicle is not necessary for mid course interception. And India is working on HTK tech.


3. Yeah, that is correct! The Indian scientist felt so sad that they desined a new missile called PDV to replace the PAD.:smokin:


In 2009, reports emerged of a new missile named the PDV. The PDV is said to be a two solid stage hypersonic anti-ballistic missile similar in class to the THAAD.

The PDV is intended to replace the existing PAD in the PAD/AAD combination. It will have an IIR seeker for its kill vehicle as well.

The PDV will replace the PAD with a far more capable missile and will complete the Phase 1 of the BMD system, allowing it to be operational by 2013. Whereupon Phase 2 development will take over for protection against missiles of the 5,000 km (3,100 mi) range class.

The PDV is designed to take out the target missile at altitudes above 150 km (93 mi).



So, there you have it! The next test of PAD will actually be PDV and yup, mid course interception is the target!

P.S. Rumors are that this was tested in 2010 but kept under wraps. But anyway, they will declare the test this year.



And a glimpse of the near future!


The Phase 2 missile defense system will be based on the AD-1 and AD-2 interceptor missile that are currently under development.

"Ground testing of the AD-1 will begin next year and the AD-1 missile will be test-fired in 2012," Saraswat told India Today in June 2010.

These interceptors would be capable of shooting down missiles that have ranges greater than 5,000 km, which follow a distinctly different trajectory than a missile with a range of 2,000 km or less. During their final phase, ICBMs hurtle towards their targets at speeds twice those of intermediate range missiles.
 
.
@ Indians, You can Never Convince a Person who is strong in his Motive... Why waste time in proving an idiot that he is one what you think him to be, he is not gonna realize it anyway..Step over him and lets Bring back the thread alive.....

This Might be an Old Technology for Some but still a New for Many and It doesnt matter if a few Nations have it, its always matters if these few Countries Could Be Bettered By another country....
 
.
this is just a 50 years old tech. completely different from China's land based mid course interceptor.

to have any mid course interception, you need kkv technologies, so far india has almost zero knowledge in that area. Check on wikipedia to see what is KKV.

oh, don't feel sad, russia doesn't have the technology. there are only two nations can do it: the USA and China.
1) Missile technology is 200 years old technology. :lol:

2) KKV? :rofl: We master hit-to-kill technology much before you learned the word KKV. lol

3) Russia has such technology much before you were born. lol


nothing to show to the public. it is a 50 years old technology. China mastered it like 30-40 years ago.

Best of luck if china canmaster it after 30-40 years. lol Try yourself.

Someone wants to troll calling it 50 years old technology but due to low GK, busted as usual. :lol:
 
. .
Ah, the same peaceful of the "India does not have wind tunnels" fame! :lol:


1. So, a two tiered terminal phase missile defence system with techs like gimballed directional warhead with P charge and with a combined hit probability of 99.8% was achieved 50 years back?:woot:.......................

.........Maybe on krypton!;)



2. Wrong! Kinetic kill vehicle is not necessary for mid course interception. And India is working on HTK tech.


3. Yeah, that is correct! The Indian scientist felt so sad that they desined a new missile called PDV to replace the PAD.:smokin:






So, there you have it! The next test of PAD will actually be PDV and yup, mid course interception is the target!

P.S. Rumors are that this was tested in 2010 but kept under wraps. But anyway, they will declare the test this year.



And a glimpse of the near future!

HELL yeah!! Tell this Peacefool guy, This test is for intercepting incoming missile at an altitude of 150km :azn:

After this, PDV would come.. and Phase I would complete by 2013 :devil:
 
. .
2) KKV? :rofl: We master hit-to-kill technology much before you learned the word KKv. lol


Kinetic bhai, do you have any info on the Indian HTK efforts?

The only related thing I heard was PAD achieving a "direct hit" on the target missile in one of the tests. But, everywhere else I find "gimballed p charge warhead" associated with PAD and AAD.


Also, Dr. Saraswat told media that we would be testing the PDV in june/july 2010, however, the reports about july 26 test mention AAD.

Has there been some smoke and mirrors from DRDO on this front just like the numerous pseudo Prithvi tests for testing systems like Shaurya?
 
.
If I am not wrong only US so far has developed such complex endo-atmospheric missile defence system.

Tomorrow's test will be difficult one.... The target missile will have anti-ballistic missile defence capablities and try to evade the interceptor. AAD will try a different trajectory as well.
 
.
Kinetic bhai, do you have any info on the Indian HTK efforts?

The only related thing I heard was PAD achieving a "direct hit" on the target missile in one of the tests. But, everywhere else I find "gimballed p charge warhead" associated with PAD and AAD.


Also, Dr. Saraswat told media that we would be testing the PDV in june/july 2010, however, the reports about july 26 test mention AAD.
Bro apart from going into technical capabilities we can also mark the words of Dr. Saraswat, who himself stated about HTK and details the interceptors are not available.

Has there been some smoke and mirrors from DRDO on this front just like the numerous pseudo Prithvi tests for testing systems like Shaurya?

I think no because endo-atm missile defence is very difficult, only 2/3 nations have such capabilities now. But its true that they are testing different configuration of the interceptor.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom