India's Two-Front War Plans

[oct605032048]

China posseses every advantage over india but neither of them unfortunately can make them take indian territory by force,mostly due to geography and gross underestimation of indian capabilities.
To quote u'but if you have noting else to say you have offered noting. '
Regards.

Kashmir is not India's territory. You want Pakistan's land, You will have to shamelessly invade your neighbour.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

Why are you so dense? Yemen lost the 100,000.

100,000 + of Saudis, Jordanians and Yemeni it was simply to prove the saudis cannot fight in modern wars this as well with the houthis your troops even with the most advanced weaponry were paper tigers.

 

[oct605032048]

lol I was being called pro India on the threads i've proven Pakistan couldn't match India, and India cannot match china it's simple, India war with pakistan will be offensive and war with China will be defensive simple.

In such circumstances, PLAAF will take care of the SKY so Pakistan can have a fair play with their trouble making neighbour.

And if India dare to attack China's merchant ships in Indian Ocean, we'll do the same in the Pacific. And we'll send out Navy to block India's oil import from Mideast.

 

[IndoUS]

I think you would understand better if you read my whole post about Pakistan....

Saudi Arabia has virtually sold everything. Pakistani army and French army sent their forces inside Mecca to kill armed terrorists. The funny thing is, we still train their forces and protect Royal Family like the Vatican City. In the Gulf War U.S. President George H. W. Bush deployed American forces into Saudi Arabia. This is true because i have seen an American Air Base and American soldiers in Saudi Arabia myself even today. Furthermore, according to many reports, Israel has leased a base to attack Iran... Saudi Arabians not only press their own Shia's, they kill Bahrainis....

If you're talking about other things, Saudi Arabia has kept billions of dollars worth of Gold in the U.S (you can see the reports of this on google), given free Oil to U.S (i have many acquaintances that know about this well).

Again looking things through the glasses of religion. Religion doesn't come first, its always national interest. Saudi get latest weapons from the US, and get what ever they want. They asked the US to intervene during the Gulf war because it was to their interest. They have US bases, yet they don't let the Americans attack innocent people in their homeland, yet Pakistan had american bases and was attacked. Even when you got military aid form the US they never gave you the technology that they share with the Saudi's. Simply because the Saudi's are better in doing business, and putting forth their demands.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

In such circumstances, PLAAF will take care of the SKY so Pakistan can have a fair play with their trouble making neighbour.

Well yes PLAAF can defend china, but pakistan will have to be defensive not to mention it's fighting a taliban insurgency so they will need to get rid of that and get their economy on track however India could very much take alot of land from pakistan the internal weakness in pakistan but it on a tricky sitution.

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

@oct6050.U may not talk about nuking mumbai but your fellow members regularly talk about breaking up india or marching to delhi.

No one denies india has a better future in co operation with china.China is an example for asia.But what is the price being asked for such cooperation,if its territorial submission and vassalage to the middle kingdom then we can do without it.

True we can't win a war with china and neither can china with us whethjer u like it or not.At least till it doesn't possess power to control the indian ocean.
So we have no problem with a freindly china that behaves as a firts among equals,but will not submit to big brother attitude.

Regards.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

but as u said, the terrain on the indian side is a complete nightmare, making logistics impossible. its not surprising that the chinese retreated in 62 after crossing over.. all it does is provide a good defence.

The India of 1962 held the best historical position against China, too bad you guys didn't capitalize it.

 

[oct605032048]

@oct6050.U may not talk about nuking mumbai but your fellow members regularly talk about breaking up india or marching to delhi.

No one denies india has a better future in co operation with china.China is an example for asia.But what is the price being asked for such cooperation,if its territorial submission and vassalage to the middle kingdom then we can do without it.

True we can't win a war with china and neither can china with us whethjer u like it or not.At least till it doesn't possess power to control the indian ocean.
So we have no problem with a freindly china that behaves as a firts among equals,but will not submit to big brother attitude.

Regards.

If you don't like a big brother attitude, don't take it out to Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

If you don't like a big brother attitude, don't take it out to Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc.

lol don't get to high on emotions now Pakistan needs peace with india now to get it back on track so pakistan india are on the correct path however the sri lanka issue is due to with the tamils and sri lanka is capable now of handling on it's own.

 

[IbnAlwaled]

100,000 + of Saudis, Jordanians and Yemeni it was simply to prove the saudis cannot fight in modern wars this as well with the houthis your troops even with the most advanced weaponry were paper tigers.

Again and for the last time, yes the combined losses are 100,000. Saudi Arabia's share(1000)
Twentieth Century Atlas - Death Tolls
Egypt 1000 too.

 

[Shinigami]

lol I was being called pro India on the threads i've proven Pakistan couldn't match India, and India cannot match china it's simple, India war with pakistan will be offensive and war with China will be defensive simple.

not really. the difference between india and china is much lesser than between india and pakistan.

Global Firepower - 2012 World Military Strength Ranking

And if India dare to attack China's merchant ships in Indian Ocean, we'll do the same in the Pacific. And we'll send out Navy to block India's oil import from Mideast.

see? this is why kids should stay away from the internet

The India of 1962 held the best historical position against China, too bad you guys didn't capitalize it.

its hard to capitalize that when u have no men, weapons or ammo

 

[oct605032048]

lol don't get to high on emotions now Pakistan needs peace with india now to get it back on track so pakistan india are on the correct path however the sri lanka issue is due to with the tamils and sri lanka is capable now of handling on it's own.

Before start a war, one has to think about ending it. Pakistan definitely not the one who wants the war.

India, on the other hands, haven't thought through about the issue above.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

Again and for the last time, yes the combined losses are 100,000. Saudi Arabia's share(1000)
Twentieth Century Atlas - Death Tolls

incorrect you lost way more then 1000 it the same no arab country wants to give out how much they lost you defiantly way more then 1000 unless saudi arabia was a secert superpower and managed to kill over 10,000 egyptians in yemen ?

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Actually its the chinese oil imports that get blocked,and any chinese attempt to relieve it by entering the indian ocean getting shot to pieces in the process.As for PLAAF taking care of the sky ,good luck with that against rafales and mkis in a SAM infested enemy territory with AKASH and SPYDERs waiting.Plus we have far better AWACS,ones that u wanted from israel but unfortunately couldn't obtain.

 

[oct605032048]

India Navy is not as power as many thinks. It has a 50 year old AC but lack of basic air-defense and ant-sub ability in high sea. Once knock off the floating coffin, the rest will post no real threat to any modern fleet.