What's new

India's Harrappan city Dholavira is now an UNESCO World Heritage

You are uneducated and ignorant Indian buffon. Origin of IVC are firmly within the dominion of Pakistan. It's all started around mehrgarh in Baluchistan FAR away from India, then to Mohenjodaro/harrapa, then it expanded further east into what is now India.




Read above.

And what is biggest and oldest? Oldest is Mehrgarh, the oldest human settlement in world, in Pakistan. Biggest? Well only 10% of Mohenjodaro and Harrapa is ever excavated.

What is important and undisputed, is the origin of IVC , in Pakistan. Hell it's called Indus for a reason.


That's bullshit. IVC origin are firmly established within Pakistan. India is just its expansion. Hence the reason for the pursuit of greater Pakistan.

'Indus' itself comes from the word 'Sindhu' so origin of Indus is firmly in the Indian heartland. Anyway IVC belongs to central India.

'Indus' actually comes from the word 'Hindu' which the persians
 
.
'Indus' itself comes from the word 'Sindhu' so origin of Indus is firmly in the Indian heartland. Anyway IVC belongs to central India.

'Indus' actually comes from the word 'Hindu' which the persians

Its Sindh, a province of PAKISTAN. nothing Indian about it. The word India itself is a colonial origin, nothing indigenous about it , let alone silly claims over Pakistani civilisation/empire. Indus and its borders define what greater Pakistan is.
 
.
'Indus' itself comes from the word 'Sindhu' so origin of Indus is firmly in the Indian heartland. Anyway IVC belongs to central India.

'Indus' actually comes from the word 'Hindu' which the persians
The Indus Valley of the Indus Valley civilization is in Pakistan. Without that India doesn't have the heartland of the real civilization.
 
.
The Indus Valley of the Indus Valley civilization is in Pakistan. Without that India doesn't have the heartland of the real civilization.

Some people just dont understand geography. Lol.

It's like Syrian and Israeli laying claim over Egyptian/Nile civilisation becuase their lands were once part of that civilisation. :D
 
.
lol keep trying babies.
The Indus Valley of the Indus Valley civilization is in Pakistan. Without that India doesn't have the heartland of the real civilization.

They love stealing everyone's history and claim it as their own.
 
.
Some people just dont understand geography. Lol.

It's like Syrian and Israeli laying claim over Egyptian/Nile civilisation becuase their lands were once part of that civilisation. :D

Actually there's a sinister long term goal for India involved here for her strategic water plans.

Dholavohra is touted to be in Saraswati river thought to be long dried or mythical.

So instead of fighting over GI Tags, why not fight for water? Of course you don't have time for this as you are employed to hunt ghostly traitors within your own ranks.
 
.
Some people just dont understand geography. Lol.

It's like Syrian and Israeli laying claim over Egyptian/Nile civilisation becuase their lands were once part of that civilisation. :D
Indus valley civ and Harrapan civ are all names given at various times due to sites that were first discovered. Not all major sites are located along the banks of Indus.
 
.
Actually there's a sinister long term goal for India involved here for her strategic water plans.

Dholavohra is touted to be in Saraswati river thought to be long dried or mythical.

So instead of fighting over GI Tags, why not fight for water? Of course you don't have time for this as you are employed to hunt ghostly traitors within your own ranks.
When I was reading up on IVC, it struck me how huge their skeletons were, and how robustly built they were.

There are >180cm, wide shouldered skeletons on record of people who lived in prime health to their death. Provably men weighted 80kg+.

By standards of the bronze age, they were giants, bigger than Egyptians whom Greeks themselves called giants for 170cm+ height.

Now, look at a typical scrawny vegetarian specimens from the subcontinent today :haha:
 
.
When I was reading up on IVC, it struck me how huge their skeletons were, and how robustly built they were.

There are >180cm, wide shouldered skeletons on record of people who lived in prime health to their death. Provably men weighted 80kg+.

By standards of the bronze age, they were giants, bigger than Egyptians whom Greeks themselves called giants for 170cm+ height.

Now, look at a typical scrawny vegetarian specimens from the subcontinent today :haha:

Vegetarian extremism is a new innovation in the region's history.
 
.
Indus valley civ and Harrapan civ are all names given at various times due to sites that were first discovered. Not all major sites are located along the banks of Indus.

I dont like to repeat myself but again, the ORIGIN of IVC is firmly established on the "western" banks of Indus river, far away from present day India, Mehrgarh and its surroundings to be precise, in Baluchistan. What you find in India, is the natural expansion of the empire/regime. Not long ago you were subjects of British raj, that doesnt make you custodian of British empire, that will always be the original inhabitant of British Isles.
 
.
I dont like to repeat myself but again, the ORIGIN of IVC is firmly established on the "western" banks of Indus river, far away from present day India, Mehrgarh and its surroundings to be precise, in Baluchistan. What you find in India, is the natural expansion of the empire/regime. Not long ago you were subjects of British raj, that doesnt make you custodian of British empire, that will always be the original inhabitant of British Isles.
And I again repeat we are basically the same people having equally important sites. The British logic doesn't work here. It's like calling South London is Colony of North London because North is older:lol:
 
.
When I was reading up on IVC, it struck me how huge their skeletons were, and how robustly built they were.

There are >180cm, wide shouldered skeletons on record of people who lived in prime health to their death. Provably men weighted 80kg+.

By standards of the bronze age, they were giants, bigger than Egyptians whom Greeks themselves called giants for 170cm+ height.

Now, look at a typical scrawny vegetarian specimens from the subcontinent today :haha:


IVC is the original civilization of humanity, much older then Babylon and Egypt, three times bigger then both combined. However there is a reluctance in world to accept or talk about it, for obvious reason.
 
.
And I again repeat we are basically the same people having equally important sites. The British logic doesn't work here. It's like calling South London is Colony of North London because North is older:lol:

Would Roman empire engulfing its immediate neighbours first would do? LOL.

Dude you are gangiyates by en large, find your origins around Ganga river. Indus belong to its people, its inhabitants who live around Indus river.
 
.
Would Roman empire engulfing its immediate neighbours first would do? LOL.

Dude you are gangiyates by en large, find your origins around Ganga river. Indus belong to its people, its inhabitants who live around Indus river.
So people outside city of Rome in Italy are not part of Roman Empire? If you are meaning Romans taking over Germany then it's not the same as Indus Valley. As I said before by all accounts they were same people having same culture, script, etc. Germans and Roman cultures and language were very different.
 
.
Indus valley civ and Harrapan civ are all names given at various times due to sites that were first discovered. Not all major sites are located along the banks of Indus.
Tye civilisation is from the Indus

It the spread to some areas that are now in India but that's the Indus civilisation SPREADING

The Indus valley civilization was in every Pakistani province

Whilst it's just in the border areas of India


Most Indians have nothing to do with Pakistani heritage


It's cringe worthy watching Indians trying to connect themselves with Pakistani lands history
 
.
Back
Top Bottom