India's Harrappan city Dholavira is now an UNESCO World Heritage

[Varunastra]

Tye civilisation is from the Indus

It the spread to some areas that are now in India but that's the Indus civilisation SPREADING

The Indus valley civilization was in every Pakistani province

Whilst it's just in the border areas of India


Most Indians have nothing to do with Pakistani heritage


It's cringe worthy watching Indians trying to connect themselves with Pakistani lands history

Rest of world believe it to be truly Indian, birthplace of Indian civilization, birthplace of Hinduism and ancestors of majority of Indians. Only Pakistanis have problem with this.

 

[hussain0216]

Rest of world believe it to be truly Indian, birthplace of Indian civilization, birthplace of Hinduism and ancestors of majority of Indians. Only Pakistanis have problem with this.

Only utter ignorance would connect it to India because India has little connection to our land, our people and our heritage and history

All the civilisation including the small parts within India borders were an extension of the heritage of Pakistan and the Indus valley

it was Our people, spreading OUR civilization

indians were not part of our heritage



you stay with your jungle ganga civilization and stay away from our heritage

 

[LeGenD]

Rest of world believe it to be truly Indian, birthplace of Indian civilization, birthplace of Hinduism and ancestors of majority of Indians. Only Pakistanis have problem with this.

Define "Indian."

Do you have proof of Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) declaring itself as "Indian"?

British coined the term "Indian" and blanket-assigned it to the entire subcontinent.

IVC have nothing to do with Hindu religion and the term "Indian." This was a civilization that was shaped by and existed around the Indus river in large part. It wasn't a subcontinental thing.

How difficult is this to understand?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

So people outside city of Rome in Italy are not part of Roman Empire? If you are meaning Romans taking over Germany then it's not the same as Indus Valley. As I said before by all accounts they were same people having same culture, script, etc. Germans and Roman cultures and language were very different.

Greece was part of the Roman empire. are they same people? Turkey as well, are they are same people?

Syria, Israel, Sudan were all part of Egyptian civilization, do you hear them laying claim or association with Egypt? It will sound funny isnt it?

Yes there will be overlap due to proximity, that north west belt of present day India, from Kashmir down to Gujrat, what you see there is the expansion of Indus. Majority of people there will be the ones who expanded the Indus "originated" in Pakistan and made it part of the empire/civilization. Rest of the present day Indians have nothing in common with Pakistanis, the original habitants of IVC.

 

[Varunastra]

Greece was part of the Roman empire. are they same people? Turkey as well, are they are same people?

Syria, Israel, Sudan were all part of Egyptian civilization, do you hear them laying claim or association with Egypt? It will sound funny isnt it?

Yes there will be overlap due to proximity, that north west belt of present day India, from Kashmir down to Gujrat, what you see there is the expansion of Indus. Majority of people there will be the ones who expanded the Indus "originated" in Pakistan and made it part of the empire/civilization. Rest of the present day Indians have nothing in common with Pakistanis, the original habitants of IVC.

You basically said what I meant to explain. Yes Germans, British, Greece, Turkey, Egypt under Roman empire rule are not Roman as they have different culture, language etc. Italians outside city of Rome are very much Roman as they are same people with same culture.
It's laughable how clouded brains of few people are here.
Anyways my job is not to change what you all think. It's fine if rest of world believes.

Define "Indian."

Do you have proof of Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) declaring itself as "Indian"?

British coined the term "Indian" and blanket-assigned it to the entire subcontinent.

IVC have nothing to do with Hindu religion and the term "Indian." This was a civilization that was shaped by and existed around the Indus river in large part. It wasn't a subcontinental thing.

How difficult is this to understand?

Proof of IVC people declaring themselves Pakistani please

Only utter ignorance would connect it to India because India has little connection to our land, our people and our heritage and history

All the civilisation including the small parts within India borders were an extension of the heritage of Pakistan and the Indus valley

it was Our people, spreading OUR civilization

indians were not part of our heritage



you stay with your jungle ganga civilization and stay away from our heritage

We already own majority of IVC heritage by popular opinion

 

[Taimoor Khan]

You basically said what I meant to explain. Yes Germans, British, Greece, Turkey, Egypt under Roman empire rule are not Roman as they have different culture, language etc. Italians outside city of Rome are very much Roman as they are same people with same culture.
It's laughable how clouded brains of few people are here.
Anyways my job is not to change what you all think. It's fine if rest of world believes.

LOL.

You are claiming IVC as Indian which clearly it isn't. All you are doing is approving that north western belt of present day India was civilized by ancient Pakistanis and you are their offsprings.

 

[Varunastra]

LOL.

You are claiming IVC as Indian which clearly it isn't. All you are doing is approving that north western belt of present day India was civilized by ancient Pakistanis and you are their offsprings.

Again you can't claim nationality here. Yes migrations have occured but current Indians are the same people and have many major IVC sites. Our earliest ancestors came from Africa so should a person from Ghana start claiming everything as African, no right? There are things such as language, culture, genetics etc which can determine the people of a civilization.
But I'm tired of saying the same points again and again. So let's just agree to disagree.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Again you can't claim nationality here. Yes migrations have occured but current Indians are the same people and have many major IVC sites. Our earliest ancestors came from Africa so should a person from Ghana start claiming everything as African, no right? There are things such as language, culture, genetics etc which can determine the people of a civilization.
But I'm tired of saying the same points again and again. So let's just agree to disagree.

Pakistan IS the Indus basin if you know your geography, and its people the original ones, the MAKERS of the civilization. You Indians, on the other hand are the by-products.

 

[Varunastra]

Pakistan IS the Indus basin if you know your geography, and its people the original ones, the MAKERS of the civilization. You Indians, on the other hand are the by-products.

Originality ka hologram sticker laga rhte hai l guess on everyone.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Originality ka hologram sticker laga rhte hai l guess on everyone.

If you get out of your hullincation and delusions, it's an archeological fact that IVC originated in Pakistan, ancient Pakistanis were its makers. I know it's a tough one to swallow for your kind but hey, life is tough.

 

[Surya 1]

LOL Harappa civilisation has nothing do to with RSS Hindustan. It is funny how a bunch of RSS donkeys are trying to claim history which doesn't even belong to them.

I think RSS fobia is deep rooted in Pakistan from a common citizen to prime minister level.