India's Defence requires Reunification of India & Pakistan

[Keysersoze]

You DO realise that that includes the city you live in right?

 

[Rabbit.Rabbit]

Alright, is the joke over yet?

 

[Keysersoze]

Alright, is the joke over yet?

Well Rabbit this guy is a full bore looney, but he hasn't breached the rules yet. Until then, he can rant and rave as much as he likes.

 

[TexasJohn]

Not to mention the sheer entertainment value. This afternoon is kinda boring anyway - needed a good laugh!

 

[kaal2009]

By the way, Pakistan is not powerless against the United States. This is what I said about Pakistan's nuclear deterrent against the United States 3 months ago:-

"For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This ... is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States."

"I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER.

So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target.

Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchants ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target.

What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative."

I also said:-

"Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man.

I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan.

Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not.

Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 in this thread is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion."

 

[Cheetah786]

With all the firangi's running around, who is going to take care of the romulans.

I take it you didnt watch much startrek Big fan here Just to clear one thing Romulans were hated by every body not just furangies + most furangies were traders not fighters do any thing for a buck

 

[jeypore]

I take it you didnt watch much startrek Big fan here Just to clear one thing Romulans were hated by every body not just furangies + most furangies were traders not fighters do any thing for a buck

Actually I am a treky. If you remember what is the goal of Romulans?

Conquest!!

Now read Mr. Kaal's post!!!

 

[kaal2009]

I would like to hear from Pakistani patriots, not just traitors living in Western countries.

About Indian and Pakistani traitors, I said three and a half months ago on this forum:-

Both India's and Pakistan's armies are parts of the British Indian army. All units, regiments, etc. of India's army have retained the identities they had during British colonial rule and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British, some of them more than 250 years ago. I believe the same is the case with Pakistan's army. MILLIONS of Indians, both Hindu and Muslim, fought under the British in both World War I and World War II and not a single one of them fought the British on behalf of their mother land, except for the prisoners of war taken by the Japanese from the Indian army which were formed into the Azad Hind Fauj by Subhash Chandra Bose. This history of loyalty to whites -- the only change is that the Americans have replaced the British -- has some thing to do with the fact that Pakistan's armed forces do not even try to shoot down American drones. Close relatives -- sons, etc. -- of practically all senior officers of both India's and Pakistan's armed forces live and work in the United States and I have found, in the case of Indians, that their loyalties are with the White Master; I believe the same is the case with officers of Pakistan's armed forces. An example of this seems to be the gentleman named Niazi who posted above. I have only come across this name once -- Lt. General Niazi who commanded Pakistan's forces in East Pakistan and surrendered to India's Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Arora in 1971. Lt. Gen. Niazi was in the British Indian army and won a Military Cross for valor fighting for the British. On looking at the other posts of Mr. Niazi, it seems he is indeed a nephew of Lt. Gen. Niazi and himself lives in the United States. His post above shows a degree of identification with the American drone attackers. He refers to the drones being "expensive" and says the Americans will "perk up" if you shoot them down. His 'blood boils' not at those who are attacking Pakistani territory but at the Pakistani victims of the drone attacks. I don't mean to make an ad hominem argument with respect to Mr. Niazi but only referred to him as an example of the reason why Pakistan remains undefended against the Americans -- the reason being that both India's and Pakistan's armies are more loyal to their white colonial masters -- past and future -- than to their own people, though this problem of loyalty to white foreigners exists in the civilian population as well. There are millions of Indians living in the United States, from civilian and military families in India and most of them are just as loyal to the Americans as Mr. Niazi is and hate any patriotism for India as Mr. Niazi does for Pakistan and the same is true of their family members in India. I have no reason to believe things are very different for Pakistanis. India similarly remains undefended against the United States.

Contrast the behavior of Indians and Pakistanis with that of Iraqis; the Iraqi citizens' militias, during the second invasion of Iraq in 2003, charged American tanks in cars and SUVs and were cut down by the TENS OF THOUSANDS without the Americans suffering a single casualty. No amount of advanced weaponry will be of use if there is no desire to defend your country against whites. The Americans are depending upon this characteristic of Indians and Pakistanis in their plans to occupy and re-colonise the subcontinent. I have said in post # 1 above that the recent terror attacks in Mumbai were meant to facilitate these plans. The U.S. government does not keep its sponsorship of terrorism in the subcontinent a secret. Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." ( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/...next-us-target ). The same is the case with terrorism in India. The United States' sponsorship of terrorism is the least of what it does. I have written about its suppression of India's research and development and its spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year on 24-hour satellite surveillance and crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for over 31 years.

In Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi movements, Madarasa-educated youngsters, etc. -- which do motivate many Pakistanis to fight white aggressors. So there is hope for Pakistan. In India, however, even such movements are lacking.

Perhaps I am being unfair to senior Pakistani military officers. Just before the second Gulf War, there was a report of an Egyptian dignitary visiting Pakistan saying that Pakistan and Egypt will act together to save the Islamic Ummah, apparently the plan being for Egyptian planes to deliver Pakistani nuclear weapons to European capitals, if necessary. But the Americans came to know of the plan and it had to be aborted. It is more likely that I am being too generous to Pakistani military officers, considering they would not even defend Pakistan's own territory against the United States. Exactly the same is the case with Indians; Indians both in and outside government eagerly participate in the United States' crimes against India and their blood boils at any one who disturbs this master-slave arrangement. India's only hope is in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
-------------------------------------------------

Don't make such stupid, personally insulting comments. Indians are lackeys of the Americans and cannot tolerate any accusation against them. It is all part of submission to the white man. A handful of the British, from half way around the world, had ruled India for centuries, because of stupid people like you. If you see the thread on RAW in the Indian defence section, you will see how even today India's main intelligence agency is an instrument of American rule over India. RAW has many operatives on such forums to abuse and insult anyone who points an accusing finger at the United States. Don't do that; I will crush you like a cockroach.

Coming back to ways Pakistan can defend itself: In letters to the press several years ago, I showed how radiological weapons (weapons that spread radioactive material over large areas, instead of producing heat and blast) can give even the smallest country military power comparable to that of a superpower. Just half a dozen two-inch mortars, operated by the country's special forces, can cover a city the size of London with radioactive material in a matter of minutes forcing the city's evacuation. Pakistan could give an ultimatum demanding the immediate stoppage of the Predator attacks on its territory and withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in, say, three weeks under pain of such forced evacuation of London. To be effective, the operation should be carried out over London before the ultimatum and the ultimatum should demand withdrawal from Afghanistan on pain of similar forced evacuations of other Western cities of comparable size.
After World War II, the United States had considered having its nuclear arsenal consist almost entirely of radiological weapons. It decided in favour of fission and fusion bombs but that does not mean that countries that cannot easily produce fission and fusion bombs should not go for radiological weapons. They are much more usable and more effective in many ways.
--------------------------------------------
I have said that stopping U.S. drone attacks on Pakistan is part of the larger problem of ejecting the United States from Afghanistan. But ejecting the United States from Afghanistan is itself a part of the larger problem of breaking United States' global dominance. Breaking the United States' global dominance, in this nuclear age, requires destroying the United States. The Soviet Union was at least a match for the United States in both its nuclear and conventional military strength but, despite Khrushchev's banging of his shoe in the United Nations, it was not prepared to destroy the United States; all its nuclear buildup was in reaction to the United States' buildup. For the United States, on the other hand, its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms, not for defensive but aggressive purposes, is central to its global dominance. This has consequences for what needs to be done to save the subcontinent from the United States; as I have said, the drone attacks are the opening of a campaign by the United States to directly occupy and colonise the subcontinent.

In designing nuclear weapons for use against the United States, radioactive materials should be identified that can be dispersed over the territory of the United States, either via separate radiological weapons (“dirty bombs&#8221 or as part of the regular thermonuclear weapons, that will so contaminate the territory of the United States with radioactivity that nothing will grow there for at least several years that can be consumed without getting a lethal dose of radiation. This will force the Americans who survive the nuclear bomb explosions on the four thousand largest population centers to eat one another till no one remains alive.

The ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with such radioactivity can be done in a separate operation -- such as by unmanned aerial vehicles -- after its four thousand largest population centers have been destroyed by regular thermonuclear weapons. This requires that India be the dominant power after the initial exchange of, say, five thousand nuclear weapons between India and the United States. India has the leadership required for this but the cover up of the news and views of the leadership has to be lifted. Lifting this cover up is the first stage of India’s war for survival. As this cover up is lifted, many politicians, media people and, above all, RAW bosses such as the kingpin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India for decades, K. Subrahmanyam, will try to flee to the United States and those who succeed will share the fate of Americans. Once the cover up of the news about the greatest living Indian is lifted, the genocidal intent and behaviour of the United States toward India will be clear. He has been writing about it for three decades.

The grip of the United States on India through C.I.A.-RAW can be broken only temporarily by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Exterminating the population of the United States is essential for India to survive.

I have dealt further with the problem of traitors in the armed forces of both India and Pakistan:-

In India's army, the officers and men identify with and take pride in their regiments and regimental history and their regimental history invariably goes back to the British officers who founded or commanded the regiment and their exploits. This way they feel they are one with the British and the power and military successes of the British victors is also theirs and they do not have to feel they are like the inferior native rulers' armies the British so thoroughly routed. This feeling of being in the same army with the British is central to their morale and their ability to fight well and they cling to it because otherwise they will be like all the other inferior Indians who lost and were routed and will have no morale to speak of.

The Indian Civil Service (ICS), with which the British ruled India, was renamed Indian Administrative Service (IAS) after India's so-called 'Independence' and the IAS has often been called the "steel frame" which holds India together, because the IAS also have their loyalties rooted in their history as the British rulers of India with a few Indians mixed in. The present day members of the IAS still see themselves as agents of whites (with the Americans having replaced the British) ruling India. Their connection to present day white countries is live and continuing and they continue to receive instructions/orders, as well as money, from their white masters through RAW whereas in the army, the connection with the British is only through old faded photographs and trophies and tales of battles and campaigns.

The armed forces can transfer their pride and loyalties to indigenous India from British colonial India if the indigenous India is seen as headed toward military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- over the strongest white country and this can become the anchor of their morale. Since their connection to the British is through old faded photographs and trophies, they are not so bound to the current imperial power, the United States, as the civil servants are.

Insofar as Pakistan's army has maintained the same regimental system, the above explains why they have difficulty shooting down American drones; it can be termed broadly a problem of morale. Military entities without a British history or present or recent American connections should have no problems of morale, just equipment. (Note that Mr. Niazi above referred to having "our proxies" shoot them down; why should he even think of having proxies defend the country rather than the armed forces themselves?).
--------------------------------------------
I have also shown how the problem of traitors in the armed forces can be by-passed. I said the following regarding India, but the same applies to Pakistan as well. This is what I said on February 27, 2008:-

"DRDO [Defence Research and Development Organisation] are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is milllions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.
The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; if the politicians don't agree to amending the Constitution, it can be done in other ways."

 

[A.Rahman]

With all the firangi's running around, who is going to take care of the romulans.

The federation?

 

[kaal2009]

This thread is not about Star Trek. Please stay on the topic. If you are suggesting a federation of India and Pakistan, that is fine, but you can say so directly; there is no need to refer to Star Trek. Don't derail the thread with irrelevant posts.

The biggest defence problem both India and Pakistan face is the problem of traitors. This problem exists, at least in India, even in the nuclear weapons and missile fields. Examples of this problem in the nuclear and missile fields are in the following comments I have made:-

In a letter to the press I said that India's nuclear scientists that have been bought up will now sabotage India's indigenous nuclear program. Such sabotage has already started. As I said in an earlier letter, one of the United States' objectives is to get Indian scientists to switch to designing 'proliferation resistant' nuclear reactors -- that is, reactors from which it will be difficult to get material for making weapons. In his speech to the IAEA in Vienna recently, Kakodkar said India is "actively pursuing the design and development of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor which will mainly use thorium [and] would meet ... proliferation resistance goals" (Indian Express, September 21 '07, Internet). This is grievous sabotage of India's nuclear program. The number of traitors -- thousands of RAW employees, politicians, media people, etc. -- that will have to be executed -- they include all those in public life who are silent about nuclear supremacy for India and, therefore, are for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy, the United States -- is so large that a practical way would be to line them up along trenches and machine gun them. Locations of such trenches could be along Raj Path in New Delhi and elsewhere.

Since I wrote the above, I have said killing the traitors will be accomplished by means of two nuclear explosions in New Delhi -- one targeted at RAW headquarters, the other at North and South Blocks.

Regarding destroying the United States with nuclear-armed missiles, I have said: There are substantial distances between population centers in the United States even in its thickly populated areas such as the East Coast, so the regular kind of thermonuclear weapons will be properly targeted and guided and, since the United States can be expected to start putting out erroneous coordinates for its population centers, their coordinates should be obtained from present or past paper, not future or electronic, sources -- unless India’s own satellites are the source and the coordinates are cross-checked for fudging by traitors because Government of India traitors through ISRO launched an Israeli spy satellite of the kind that the U.S. National Security Agency/ C.I.A.-RAW have been using to do immense damage to India, India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years, etc. and billions are poured into Israeli radars, etc., instead of Indian R & D by Government of India traitors, though all this will come to an end with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- and it is not too early to start compiling lists of five thousand targets and their coordinates, starting with the largest cities; Manhattan island alone in New York City will need to be targeted at at least three points. Even today, in this age of highly accurate missiles carrying multiple warheads, Russia has some ICBMs equipped with a single twenty or twenty five megaton warhead because of their utility in destroying large cities but India can do the job with multiple warheads of lower yields, thoroughly tested to their full yields, of course.

 

[kaal2009]

The problem of traitors, in both India and Pakistan, of course extends from the top to the bottom. India's Opposition BJP party today referred to "the fact that the nation has a captive Prime Minister in Manmohan Singh," and
Congress President Sonia Gandhi today upped the ante ridiculing BJP prime ministerial candidate's "strong leader" pitch, saying he cannot take any decision on his own "without the fear of RSS".

"It is Advani, who is a slave of RSS because he wants to protect his chair. This is the reason why he panders to each and every wish of RSS," Gandhi said.

"Advani have been alleging that Singh was a weak prime minister and that he cannot take any decision without consulting Sonia Gandhi."

Neither side is mentioning the fact that both their leaders are slaves of the United States and cannot take any decision without permission of the United States. The same is the case with the rulers of Pakistan.

The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will take care of these traitors in India. Then the destruction of the United States by India will liberate other countries as well, including Pakistan. Both countries ought to work unitedly toward this goal -- at least the patriots in both countries, not the traitors; the traitors will be taken care of along the way.

 

[kaal2009]

Another aspect of dealing with traitors is dealing with the subversion carried out by firangis in the subcontinent and the traitors who work for firangis in the subcontinent or in the firangi countries. I said the following about India but it applies to Pakistan as well:-

"National Security: Ridding India of Firangis & Their Agents

Internal security is a necessary component of national security. For India, internal security requires the following:
1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the ‘civilian list’ for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place (see my article ‘No IAEA Inspections Will Be Allowed In India‘, in my blog).
2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy.
3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot.

The nuclear deal, of which the IAEA inspections are a part, is being IMPOSED on India -- the control of politicians and others by bribery, etc., is also a part of the imposition though the ultimate threat of military action is its foundation -- and this imposition is a manifestation of India's state of subjugation to the firangi which has other aspects -- such as sending 80,000 postgraduate students to the United States every year, making no serious effort to educate them in India, putting half a million engineers and others on the payroll, directly or indirectly, of the United States every year, so they join the millions other Indians, military and non-military, on British payrolls willing to give their lives for their British masters and now are willing to give their lives for their American masters. The opposition to the nuclear deal is founded on an opposition to subjugation to the firangi, which requires demanding strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States. Not demanding nuclear supremacy over the United States leaves India open to the nuclear deal and other things being IMPOSED on a subjugated India, subjugated by killing uncounted millions in the past and the subjugation maintained by the threat of killing even more in the future. The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh) said: "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." As I have shown, the killings and the subjugation continued right up to 1947. The ability of the Americans to kill and subjugate is incomparably greater than that of the British and India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal which, as I have said, is a multi-pronged invasion of India. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences. Attaining strategic nuclear supremacy over the firangi and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat is India's real War of Independence.

Weapons are the foundation of sovereignty. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective -- which is the operative part of sovereignty, rejecting subjugation to the firangi -- automatically makes the nuclear deal untenable and unthinkable. Without adopting nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective, the nuclear deal also will continue to be IMPOSED on India by various methods. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy as a national objective not only wards off the nuclear deal and frees India from subjugation to the firangi but also opens the floodgates to prosperity and achievement in every sphere that a billion-plus people are capable of (see my articles ‘How India‘s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More‘ and ‘A Magical Solution To India‘s And The World‘s Economic Problems‘ in my blog). Unlike the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, India's nuclear supremacy will be directed at eliminating the threat, because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy. The threat must die for India to live. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy is required for this. The firangi and his Indian agents subvert and obstruct this. The three steps for India’s internal security listed above are necessary to deal with the subversion and obstruction."

 

[kaal2009]

The RAW-controlled media are still promoting the Nehru family with news and photographs. Children have started voting for other children. The jewish problem remains unsolved. The Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam remains outside jail. Traitors are still in charge of government and political parties. Nothing will move or change till the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.

I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which are NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies.

Since the jews are the cause of all of the other problems as I have said in a post above, it makes sense to solve the jewish problem by the nuclear destruction of Tel Aviv and Haifa first.

Of course the Indians, from the top to the bottom, know about the crimes of the jews against me and against India but are willing to be bought and participate in the crimes, cutting India’s and their own throats. Is it their Dravidian genes that makes them so slavish toward the white man? What implications does it have for their future and for mankind, since so long as they are allowed to exist, they will continue to contaminate the gene pool, even if they provide useful services as the white man’s slaves at present? Does this make them a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be euthanized en masse? There cannot be a more important subject for public discussion. If the ancient Indians’ great achievements were the products of Aryan genes which, with the passage of time, have become so contaminated by Dravidian genes as to make the Indians’ survival more of a threat than benefit to mankind, the ancient Indians’ achievements are no defence against the extermination of the present day Indians. If, on the other hand, the slavish submissiveness of present day Indians toward the white man is good rather than bad for mankind and it is the aggressiveness of the white barbarians which makes the latter a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be exterminated so that the gentle Indians are liberated, it is the Indians that deserve to survive, not the barbarians of Europe.

 

[kaal2009]

The considerations above apply not just to the inhabitants of India but to all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent because, as I have said, all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent carry both Aryan and Dravidian genes. This also has implications for inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent being allowed to immigrate to the United States and other white countries because, as I said on April 6, 2009 (below), mere proximity or geographical location can transfer physical/anatomical and behavioural characteristics, without any admixture of blood:-

"By the way, Negroid or Aryan, features of brown-skinned people are no guide to their behaviour because of the complex way genetics works; all brown people of the Indian subcontinent have both Aryan and Dravidian genes. The traitor Shiv Shankar Menon ... has sharp features. The very concept of 'genes' as it exists is highly problematic. Psychologist Carl Jung pointed out that Europeans who moved to North America have within very few generations and with no admixture of blood acquired some physical features of native Americans. I would add behavioral characteristics as well; the 'soul' which enters a child's body with the first breath is from among the souls that are around locally and brings with it its entire history, including behavioral characteristics and behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior. The anatomy and physical characteristics of an organism are not separate from its behaviour and both are affected by both heredity and environment. This is also the foundation of American insistence that only a U.S.-born citizen can be president of their country."

To the above, I would add that this is also the basis for the traditional physical segregation of Dravidian or low caste people from Aryan or high caste people in India, both as to the localities where their communities could live and physical contact between individuals (“untouchability&#8221. In my letter that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper in 1993-94, referred to above, about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’, I also said ”Half a million gypsies, said to have migrated from India, were killed by the Nazis. Have any films been made about that?” The British had a legal category called “Criminal Tribes” which included many of India’s wandering tribes -- without any fixed residences -- which have traditionally been considered as having criminal or anti-social characteristics. After India’s Independence, all these tribes were ‘denotified’ that is removed from that category and an attempt was made to settle them in permanent locations, though the legal category still exists. India’s police are still on heightened alerts on certain nights, such as moonless nights, when the traditional criminal tribes are thought to be particularly active. There are theories that the jews were originally from India and I have suggested that they, like gypsies, are from India’s criminal tribes which were expelled or migrated out of India milleniums ago.

 

[kaal2009]

One paragraph in my letter in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper, referred to above, said : ‘The first effect of oppression is economic deprivation. But the jews have always been economically better off than the rest of the population. This was so in the Middle Ages, it is so today. This was so in the Soviet Union, this is so in the United States. Remember Shakespeare’s character, Shylock the jew? How could a member of an oppressed minority be in a postion to demand a pound of flesh? The jews have always been the oppressors rather than the oppressed. The so-called pogroms against the jews were the occasional backlash.’ My experience at Harvard University and elsewhere has shown that the jews exercise their oppression with the worst kind of violence.