What's new

India's Congo Shame

^^^^^
Showing your gloating over the above human misery, shows the level of your humanity.
 
.
These were not peacekeepers... they were volunteers not regulars troops of PA were involved.
2_Genocide.:rofl:


Typical indian trolls have to derail threads where they are shown mirror.


Here is a pic frm assam or manipur,india:
Google Images

Im not posting it coz its graphic.


About india threatening to withdraw troops... I LOLed real hard at tht BS.... It was the congolese govt tht asked UN to withdraw indian troops.

Indian troops fathered congo babies, gold trafficking, child abuses & rapes

Indian Army probing sexual abuse charges against UN peacekeepers in Congo



And Pakistani Peacekeepers awarded medals for their service in congo:
Pakistani soldiers awarded UN peacekeeping medals in Congo

typical pakistani denial when shown the mirror.....lol...peacekeepers or not ..they were pakistani soldiers who indulged in rape....rape as in rape....professionalism...lol....

---------- Post added at 01:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:21 AM ----------

^^^^^
Showing your gloating over the above human misery, shows the level of your humanity.

who started this thread...lol..yeah shows his levels of humanity and upbringing.....
 
.
who started this thread...lol..yeah shows his levels of humanity and upbringing.....

What does pasting a topic has to do with some one's upbringing........ did I write the article.?? !!
In a thread, about Indian Army's misdeeds in Congo, somewhere along the line, you have dragged in East Pakistan..... so going by your logic, it's safe to conclude that your existence is due to the events that took supposedly took place back then. ;)
 
.
These India's Congo shame like threads are mushrooming at regular intervals.I have seen one sometime back.
 
.


So this is the big slap, as one of your comrades called it. Let's examine it.


Dealing with the gold for guns allegations first;

then Indian traders from Kenya.

Richard Ndilu, in charge of immigration at Mongbwalu airstrip, became suspicious in late 2005 when an Indian businessman arrived there and went to stay at the camp of the Pakistani peacekeepers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6681457.stm

So Indian businessmen were involved willy and nilly with the gold trading. Nice to see objectivity from the Indian members here, although I suspect it is purely accidental. In their haste to throw mud on Pakistanis they actually incriminate their own countrymen.

This is what the head of the UN in Congo said;

When we put the allegations of weapons trading to the head of the UN in Congo, Ambassador William Swing, he denied emphatically that peacekeepers had been rearming the militia.

"This I can categorically deny. What we have done is just the opposite. We have demobilised more than 20,000. We have taken in caches of arms. We have destroyed arms. We have done public burnings of these arms. And there is absolutely nothing to that allegation."


Let's say that there was a plan to bury the whole thing, yet we have not seen substantial convictions or the investigation actually finding the Pakistani peacekeepers guilty.




Now continuing with the Indian member's smear attempt, here is another article that found Indian peacekeepers doing the exact same thing that the Pakistani peacekeepers have been accused of! From the respected Guardian newspaper(UK);

Indian troops stationed around the town of Goma face charges of having widespread dealings with the violent FDLR militia, the former Rwandan army that fled to Congo after the genocide of 1994.

Accusations included the illegal buying of gold from the FDLR; the use of a UN helicopter to fly into the Virunga national park to exchange ammunition for ivory; trading UN rations for gold; the purchase of drugs from the rebels; and a general failure to support the disarmament of the group.

UN peacekeepers 'traded gold and guns with Congolese rebels' | World news | guardian.co.uk

What was the conclusion of the investigation?

From the link;

Last year, the UN investigated the allegations against the Pakistani troops and concluded that one officer was responsible for trading gold with the rebels. It could not, however, find evidence that the Pakistanis had traded arms and ammunition with dangerous rebel militias.


One officer, whilst a parallel investigation found, again from the link;

A UN investigation into the charges against the Indian peacekeepers found evidence against three soldiers illegally dealing in gold and unlawfully detaining a trader.

:)






As for the third link there was no rape and she was a prostitute hired by two policeman NOT SOLDIERS.

A U.N. investigation dismissed the rape charge but expelled the Pakistanis for hiring a prostitute.

U.N. Faces More Accusations of Sexual Misconduct (washingtonpost.com)







Now going back to the first link. The UN investigations, the Pakistani army investigation has not found any evidence of molestation by Pakistani troops and nor has anyone ever been charged.


Now compare this with the Indian numbers;

The Indian Army has launched a court of inquiry against 12 officers and 39 soldiers allegedly involved in cases of sexual abuse while they were deployed as UN peacekeepers in strife-riven Congo, an officer said on Tuesday.

51 Indian army men involved in Congo sexual abuse cases | BBC News Update

Simply staggering.
 
.
typical pakistani denial when shown the mirror.....lol...peacekeepers or not ..they were pakistani soldiers who indulged in rape....rape as in rape....professionalism...lol....

---------- Post added at 01:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:21 AM ----------



who started this thread...lol..yeah shows his levels of humanity and upbringing.....

2 cops hired a prostitutes ? rape ... really?


What he posted is just BS... Come up with something where anything was proved and our troops like indian peace keepers were told to leave the country by the host countries president/PM.
 
.
How this is rape?

On her way out, she stumbled upon two other women who too had been whisked into the camp and similarly cheated.

They were cheated not raped. The sex was consensual.
lol man, even if a husband performs sex with his wife without her wish / consent it is considered as rape. In this case 10 men had sex with her, although she thought there was one to bang her.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom