India’s attitude points to desire for war: Sartaj Aziz

[third eye]

quite the opposite!!!!! it's india that is stuck in the time warp and it is indiots...i mean indians like you who desperately log on to a Pakistani Defence forum to parrot the same old lines.

Reality is that while forces may be stretched thin, the threat from the east is more existential in nature and therefore would be given a much greater priority. Rest-assured, Pakistan is a nuclear armed nation and that in and of itself should be enough to keep your military planners soiling their pants, especially with low yield battlefield tactical nukes which will give more than just a warm reception to your ilk, when needed.

Uff..

So much hot air & English with nothing to show.

How have the nukes helped against the clear and growing danger in Pakistan.

As regards who is stuck , a look a who has progressed will help.

 

[Zaalim]

65 was stalemate, with you ending up loosing more men, material and land.

99 was hardly inconclusive, you were beaten across the board, may that be militarily or diplomatically..fact is you had captured 140 empty peaks and after losing innumerable soldiers and suffering international humiliation, you could hold on to, but one.

When India initiates a conflict..be it 71 or 84..we make sure, we are properly prepared and we win.

Whereas when Pakistan 'is prepared' and initiates a conflict may that be 65 or 99 ..the best it can hope for is a stalemate.

Your nation is incapable of winning a war against India..be that be conventional or nuclear.

You chicken shits talk the talk, but till today cannot touch Pakistan. After getting liquored up some of your bsf fire arty shells on villagers, but that's about it.

We Pakistanis have touched your Ma Bharat in all the wrong places and will continue to do so.

You can distort facts or come up with biased narratives of history, but at the end of the day your terrorist leader Modi, the chicken shit can not even touch Pakistan.

Life is good when you live in the delusion of a supa powa.

 

[Shot-Caller]

65 was stalemate, with you ending up loosing more men, material and land.

99 was hardly inconclusive, you were beaten across the board, may that be militarily or diplomatically..fact is you had captured 140 empty peaks and after losing innumerable soldiers and suffering international humiliation, you could hold on to, but one.

When India initiates a conflict..be it 71 or 84..we make sure, we are properly prepared and we win.

Whereas when Pakistan 'is prepared' and initiates a conflict may that be 65 or 99 ..the best it can hope for is a stalemate.

Your nation is incapable of winning a war against India..be that be conventional or nuclear.

99 was a politically intrusion. The men you say we lost were returning due to political pressure you hit the ones who were moving back, one of the most cowardly acts. You say in 71 you were prepared. Prepared for what? To interfere and arm a separatist movement in another country? You take pride in it. Why does it hurt you so much when we talk about Kashmir then? Hypocrites.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

This is really funny.
After finishing this thread, i clicked on the New Posts and found this post.

Ex-MI6 Boss Warns West Not To Insult Islam

The very first line says

"Those who insult Islam should expect to be attacked, suggests ex-MI6 boss as he agrees with the Pope's Charlie Hebdo comments.

By Alistair Bunkall, Defence Correspondent
"

Now can some fanatic justify his attack on @Horus by using same logic. @Horus, be careful.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

@Abu Zolfiqar @Horus

The recent LOC and IB firing incidents are JUST one more event
in the long trail of the Pakistan Army’s “conflict initiation.”

It was bound to end as all such events have with “conflict termination” by India

 

[I.R.A]

84

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

In 99 - you held Pt.5353 from before the war. If holding on to it was the sole reason, I don't know why you had to move into Indian territory.

incorrect - the enemy just wasn't occupying that position at the time

@Abu Zolfiqar @Horus

The recent LOC and IB firing incidents are JUST one more event
in the long trail of the Pakistan Army’s “conflict initiation.”

It was bound to end as all such events have with “conflict termination” by India

things are only getting warmed up......i vaguely recall in 2013 it was indians trying to stir up trouble and then their corpses being desecrated by Kashmiri fighters and used for football

 

[Stephen Cohen]

@Abu Zolfiqar @Horus

Pakistanis really miss Manmohan SIngh isnt it

 

[Zaalim]

incorrect - the enemy just wasn't occupying that position at the time

Indians live in delusion. After getting raped by Pakistan in Kargil, Indian generals had to reevaluate their entire war doctrine. Their own generals admit this, yet these saffron bhangis come and chest thump about their supposed 'victory'.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

things are only getting warmed up......i vaguely recall in 2013 it was indians trying to stir up trouble and then their corpses being desecrated by Kashmiri fighters and used for football

That time Manmohan SIngh was in power

Indian Army's HANDS had been tied

NOW look what we are doing ; That is why Pakistani LEADERS
are all complaining about India's agressiveness

We have NOT even started the proper and formal fight
Mortars dont count

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

That time Manmohan SIngh was in power

oh right and he was the one manning the guns too

Indian Army's HANDS had been tied

NOW look what we are doing ; That is why Pakistani LEADERS
are all complaining about India's agressiveness

Nope, we're just firing right back at you as we always do. Like i said - things are only getting warmed up

Only difference is - we dont call flag meetings and then ambush unsuspecting troops. That's only a cheap tactic which unruly honourless sissies would resort to

 

[Star Wars]

Pakistan has to prepare for a war, its only a matter of when these self radicalized Hindutvas go on a maha yudh drive. Pakistan's military strategy should focus on inflicting mass casualties on Indian civilians for voting these extremists into office. Hindutvas need to be told that their little Hindu Reich will actually result in a collective 'chita' in which they will burn collectively.

Last time someone said something so stupid,it did not end well. Remember
"I would rather be a terrorist than an Indian" it ended up in world news Embarrassing Pakistanis and PDF alike. So for your own personal sake delete the post.

 

[ares]

99 was a politically intrusion. The men you say we lost were returning due to political pressure you hit the ones who were moving back, one of the most cowardly acts. You say in 71 you were prepared. Prepared for what? To interfere and arm a separatist movement in another country? You take pride in it. Why does it hurt you so much when we talk about Kashmir then? Hypocrite.

Only an idiot would believe that Pakistan was winning militarily but Pakistani Prime minister decided to fly to US uninvited on 4th of July and get himself humiliated by US president.

You did talk about Kashmir before 71, infact did much more, you sent infiltrators to spark a rebellion, tried to take it by force in 65 and that is why you were dismembered in 71.

We don't usually start a conflict but when we do, we make sure we win.

 

[Shot-Caller]

That time Manmohan SIngh was in power

Indian Army's HANDS had been tied

NOW look what we are doing ; That is why Pakistani LEADERS
are all complaining about India's agressiveness

We have NOT even started the proper and formal fight
Mortars dont count

What are you boasting about? You killed 2 of our soldiers who were going for flag meeting and got 5 of your men killed in retaliation. Is that what you're proud of?

 

[ares]

Siachen