India’s attitude points to desire for war: Sartaj Aziz

[ares]

Nothing that we didnt predict when it became clear that these fanatical dot-heads would win the election in that country. We ARE prepared for war and ready for it at any time. With regular ceasefire violations it's clearly not a time of "peace", or a time for "peace"....



we already gave a good counter to their not so Cold anymore Doctrine and have the proper escalation measures at our disposal - in the event of. .

Every one is always prepared for war but the fact is Pakis have never won any war in history of it existence, speaks volumes about your preparedness then and now.

 

[Star Wars]

Pakistan's military strategy should focus on inflicting mass casualties on Indian civilians for voting these extremists into office.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Every one is always prepared for war but the fact is Pakis have never won any war in history of it existence, speaks volumes about your preparedness.

We were ready for war in 2008 and your IAF pilots know very well how close they were to getting obliterated in the sky. We were ready for war in 2002 when your forces mobilized and you suffered nearly 1,000 casualties during mobilization as well as pitched battles with the PA (Zero casualties on our side).

I sometimes pray your forces WILL mis-behave so that we can show you what being prepared really means. Realities have changed.

 

[third eye]

Correction:

it's a butt-hurt india barking over NATOs gradual scale-down in Afghanistan and Pakistan's successes in Zarb e Azb that are making the hindustanis feel obliged to start trouble in our eastern sector....things haven't gone your way in Afghanistan and india's frustration is so blatant for the world to see

resources can always be re-diverted to the east at any given time and the REAL payback will come when your forces mis-behave and require a good 'peppering'

Sounds like a self justification.

Anyway, whatever sails your boat.

Meanwhile , the rest of the world moves on while Pakistan remains stuck in a time warp.

 

[ares]

We were ready for war in 2008 and your IAF pilots know very well how close they were to getting obliterated in the sky. We were ready for war in 2002 when your forces mobilized and you suffered nearly 1,000 casualties during mobilization as well as pitched battles with the PA (Zero casualties on our side).

I sometimes pray your forces WILL mis-behave so that we can show you what being prepared really means. Realities have changed.

You were prepared in 65, 71 and 99 too.. when actual combat took place..what did you win?

 

[Razia Sultana]

Pakistan has to prepare for a war, its only a matter of when these self radicalized Hindutvas go on a maha yudh drive. Pakistan's military strategy should focus on inflicting mass casualties on Indian civilians for voting these extremists into office. Hindutvas need to be told that their little Hindu Reich will actually result in a collective 'chita' in which they will burn collectively.

Are you out of your mind? only you can think of targetting civilians.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Sounds like a self justification.

Anyway, whatever sails your boat.

Meanwhile , the rest of the world moves on while Pakistan remains stuck in a time warp.

quite the opposite!!!!! it's india that is stuck in the time warp and it is indiots...i mean indians like you who desperately log on to a Pakistani Defence forum to parrot the same old lines.

Reality is that while forces may be stretched thin, the threat from the east is more existential in nature and therefore would be given a much greater priority. Rest-assured, Pakistan is a nuclear armed nation and that in and of itself should be enough to keep your military planners soiling their pants, especially with low yield battlefield tactical nukes which will give more than just a warm reception to your ilk, when needed.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

- "We WILL DESTROY PAGAN HINDU INDIA.... yaaaaaaa"
India - Ok.
The world -
Defence Industries -

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

You were prepared in 65, 71 and 99 too.. when actual combat took place..what did you win?

65 - stalemate but Lahore was defended and Sialkot became a graveyard for indian tanks

99 - inconclusive, though we still retain Pt.5353 @ Drass Sector.

for 2015 onwards best to wait and see. Spoiling surprises is never fun right?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Pakistani Defence forum to parrot the same old lines

This is not a Pakistani Defence Forum.

This is not Pakistani because they form a very small minority of users.
It is not a Defence forum because defence news are very very minimal.

 

[Zaalim]

65 - stalemate but Lahore was defended and Sialkot became a graveyard for indian tanks

99 - inconclusive, though we still retain Pt.5353 @ Drass Sector.

for 2015 onwards best to wait and see. Spoiling surprises is never fun right?

AZ, hath hola rakh yaar.

 

[Screambowl]

That's called as creating war hysteria. Talking about war when Obama is visiting, is quite obvious behaviour from Pakistani side.

 

[I.R.A]

To all you geniuses, talking about nukes going out while sitting behind a keyboard is very easy but did any of you ever realise that there are others in this region who do not deserve aftermath of our nukes going out.

For once before posting just think it is not only India, Pakistan in this region there are others who have equal right to live and grow.

Now you can carry on with your usual bulls**t.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

65 - stalemate but Lahore was defended and Sialkot became a graveyard for indian tanks

99 - inconclusive, though we still retain Pt.5353 @ Drass Sector.

for 2015 onwards best to wait and see. Spoiling surprises is never fun right?

Regarding 65, you are almost correct. The Indian 1st Armor hit a roadblock at Chawinda, not Sialkot. But the Pakistani 1st Armor also donated 100 tanks(97 to be exact) to India at Asal Uttar.

In 99 - you held Pt.5353 from before the war. If holding on to it was the sole reason, I don't know why you had to move into Indian territory.

 

[ares]

65 - stalemate but Lahore was defended and Sialkot became a graveyard for indian tanks

99 - inconclusive, though we still retain Pt.5353 @ Drass Sector.

for 2015 onwards best to wait and see. Spoiling surprises is never fun right?

65 was stalemate, with you ending up loosing more men, material and land.

99 was hardly inconclusive, you were beaten across the board, may that be militarily or diplomatically..fact is you had captured 140 empty peaks and after losing innumerable soldiers and suffering international humiliation, you could hold on to, but one.

When India initiates a conflict..be it 71 or 84..we make sure, we are properly prepared and we win.

Whereas when Pakistan 'is prepared' and initiates a conflict may that be 65 or 99 ..the best it can hope for is a stalemate.

Your nation is incapable of winning a war against India..be that be conventional or nuclear.