India’s attitude points to desire for war: Sartaj Aziz

[pursuit of happiness]

.....exacerbated by Modi regime's dogmatic rhetoric for war?

--
what about everyday jiahd factory .. by hamid gul . hafex saeed ?
i can give hundred quotes..
did you jsut wake up after may 2014 that india sudenly blaming pak.. and it was so peacful before?

 

[MilSpec]

.....exacerbated by Modi regime's dogmatic rhetoric for war?

as the content is the same, it is apt to repost what i said on the first page

Only if there was an ounce of objectivity than crying foul.

The point amiss being in pakistan's traditional reactionary narrative is essentially the failure to realize the change in India's foreign policy of lower threshold for tolerating Pakistan's aggresive posturing.

Anyone who is on the forum for long enough, knows the dismay of Indian members here due to institutionalized inaction of the UPA government. This sense of disappointment is consistent all across the board and finally being put forth as every Pakistani transgression will derive a befitting reply from Indian forces.

Sooner pakistan can come to terms with reality, better you can plan to engage India, or you can keep singing the same evil brahmin bania zionist hindu boogeyman. the choice is yours.

 

[Kompromat]

I know this. Tikka Khans portrait still hangs in NDA. He was a distinguished instructor of officer cadets. There are plenty of other example. I am witness to that. Such tradition is no longer there.
Pakistan Army today is far more Islamist as well, as compared to the brass that served in the Indian Army before. Indian Armed forces realized this change much later - around after Kargil. This time we know that if a downed pilot of an ex CoS lands in Pakistan, he may be beheaded and played football with, instead of being invited to have tea in Lahore!
I guess you know the story...

We just returned your helicopter pilot without being 'beheaded', not too long ago.

Chopper row resolved: Pak returns Indian Army helicopter, crew : North, News - India Today

 

[pursuit of happiness]

This is an age of Total war. Civilians are legit targets. Harsh, but reality.
Modi is an excuse, albeit a convenient one. Pakistan is trying to galvanize support for the anti Hindu narrative by raising the bogey of Hindutva fascism.

--
problem is they have already cant handle anything there.. let petrol to economy to terrorist to trade..
so india is good bashing bag

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Pakistan has to prepare for a war, its only a matter of when these self radicalized Hindutvas go on a maha yudh drive. Pakistan's military strategy should focus on inflicting mass casualties on Indian civilians for voting these extremists into office. Hindutvas need to be told that their little Hindu Reich will actually result in a collective 'chita' in which they will burn collectively.
---

its your word horus..
inflicting mass caualties on indian civilian .. its crips and clear.. you not talking about militray - army war ..
you still have doubt?

It is legitimate. In case of war if they are capable of snuffing out the lives of millions of infants, women and children - they will be doing it. It is not moral. But it is one way of waging war. Please accept this as a possibility.

 

[Star Wars]

This is an age of Total war. Civilians are legit targets. Harsh, but reality.
Modi is an excuse, albeit a convenient one. Pakistan is trying to galvanize support for the anti Hindu narrative by raising the bogey of Hindutva fascism.

When were they not legit targets ? Truth is they are less of legit targets today as they were during WW2 or in the medieval era or any other era.. so i totally Disagree

 

[doppelganger]

This is an age of Total war. Civilians are legit targets. Harsh, but reality.
Modi is an excuse, albeit a convenient one. Pakistan is trying to galvanize support for the anti Hindu narrative by raising the bogey of Hindutva fascism.

You cannot have total war between two nuclear states on each others doorsteps.

Long before that happens, one side is going to be taken out of the picture. Permanently. As a military power. As an autonomous state.

We are actually militarily mixing up two things. Total war is not interchangeable with the targeting of civilians. That went out with WWII and the fire bombing and nuking of cities.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

We just returned your helicopter pilot without being 'beheaded', not too long ago.

Chopper row resolved: Pak returns Indian Army helicopter, crew : North, News - India Today

--
so you want now we put BSF gave boy who cross by mistake ..
was it point ?

 

[Kompromat]

You are backtracking form your initial hateful post. Now that you know you made a mistake you are trying to twist it into some war kills civilians humanitarian nonsense.

The above link is about Nuclear war, And the study was done when Modi was not in power

On the contrary, i was defining what warfare means in this day and age.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

We just returned your helicopter pilot without being 'beheaded', not too long ago.

Chopper row resolved: Pak returns Indian Army helicopter, crew : North, News - India Today

Of course, we also returned a stray soldier, rescued another three from a gorge on our side etc...such things happen. But I am talking about the senior brass. Their was a sense of belonging - a sense of concern. Like Sam felt proud at the performance of the FF, of which he was once a part. The present generation of Pak Officer cadets are an entirely different breed. Efficient and capable, no doubt, but .... you know...

 

[Kompromat]

--
so you want now we put BSF gave boy who cross by mistake ..
was it point ?

After we gave you the BSF soldier.

 

[Star Wars]

On the contrary, i was defining what warfare means in this day and age.

But what i don;t get is what does that have to do with people voting for Modi ? Its not like were buddies before he came to power

 

[pursuit of happiness]

It is legitimate. In case of war if they are capable of snuffing out the lives of millions of infants, women and children - they will be doing it. It is not moral. But it is one way of waging war. Please accept this as a possibility.

--
war is bad.. because those who dont have anything with it get killed..
WWII showed it..
west leared it from exp.. so they avoid that.. that why they want to be togther ..
but that cant be execuse as legitimate.. you can cripple any nation on economy .. tech.. media side..
do you think china will allow pakistan to wipe ther hardwarok?
whom do you think tip usa about musaraf tape in bijing hotel in jargil time ? why ? think ?

After we gave you the BSF soldier.

--
dear we appreciated that . but that not topic..here right

 

[SarthakGanguly]

You cannot have total war between two nuclear states on each others doorsteps.

Long before that happens, one side is going to be taken out of the picture. Permanently. As a military power. As an autonomous state.

We are actually militarily mixing up two things. Total war is not interchangeable with the targeting of civilians. That went out with WWII and the fire bombing and nuking of cities.

Yes, that is India's hope. If India IS planning an offensive, I hope it has already begun. Next gen warfare that Horus often tries to speak about.

 

[doppelganger]

But what i don;t get is what does that have to do with people voting for Modi ? Its not like were buddies before he came to power

Do we really need to justify why we voted for our leader, a man millions of us adore and respect?