What's new

India's anti ballistic missile capabilities

how to overcome india's anti-ballistic missile capabilities?

simple.. its a numbers game... simply launch more missiles than they can counter. even with a success rate of 98%, the 2% that do pass thru.. will destroy all of india
awww Halwa samjha hai kya........:azn:......like we will b waiting for u to launch ur 2nd missile.............and remember one thing tht we hve anti ballistic missile shield to counter ur missile to some extent............but i don't think u hve anything which can counter Brahmos......:sniper:
 
Last edited:
.
No ABM system can guarantee 100% protection from incoming ballistic missiles.The advantage of having a mature ABM platform is that It deters enemy from expecting a successful first strike,all the while expecting a full scale retaliation.
 
.
and remember one thing tht we hve anti ballistic missile shield to counter ur missile to some extent............but i don't think u hve anything which can counter Brahmos......:sniper:

Why not?
we have pigeons...We can launch thousands of pigeons so that BrahMos get knocked out of the sky due to bird strike...That is if it ever manages to reach a land target.:lol::lol:
 
.
lol ABMS are nothing to babur i wanna know what can take it out beacuse it got TH mode soo itss preety much stealth
 
.
Please stop taunting us on floods..We survived ojhri camp ammunition depo,we survived earthquake,we survive terrorism every day..and we will continue surviving..Floods wont end Pakistan...a few months later..it will be a distant memory...We will heal.
This forum is about discussing military weaponry and capabilities mainly..so lets stick to that..

Comparing flood relief and Anti missile weaponry is just daft.

Please use the search tool on top of the page
This idea has been presented, discussed and defended more than a year ago.
No need for this silly ranting.
 
. .
India & Pakistan are attached to each other ... do Anti-Ballistic System will work in such a Short distance ?
 
.
India & Pakistan are attached to each other ... do Anti-Ballistic System will work in such a Short distance ?

If India is trying to protect Bangalore, Hyderabad,Mumbai or Delhi etc...
yes it would work.
For cities like Jaipur, jodhpur etc.... the chances of anti-basaltic system working properly is reduced due to proximity with Pakistan.
 
.
Please use the search tool on top of the page
This idea has been presented, discussed and defended more than a year ago.
No need for this silly ranting.

Er? What are you on about mate?

Is it just me.....or you never make any sense?
 
.
Er? What are you on about mate?

Is it just me.....or you never make any sense?

This topic has been discussed previously in a lot of detail.
some senior members spent a lot of time on it.

The person who initiated this thread has been banned; the starting statements of the thread are down right Juvenile.

so why continue with this ?
why not just search the details ?
 
.
unacceptable damage"so be prepared for Karachi,Lahore,Islamabad,Rawalipind,Quetta,Faislabad,Hyderabad,Peshawar and other of 20 largest of your cities and major industrial,military and nuclear facilities getting destroyed!!!

so even using nuclear weapon in any case against India will bring back lots of LOVE back from us!!!

Mate...what makes you think that these cities were never destroyed? Islamabad was nearly obliterated in the infamous Ojhri Ammunition Dump disaster...
Most of the industries of FaisalAbad have went out of business due to indiscriminate Load shedding,and then came back to life somehow.
Peshawar had been taken over by Drug Barons of Afghanistan..
And yet we live on and thrive..
You can destroy what you want..But for reasons unknown and unexplained..Pakistan will still be there..
 
.
This topic has been discussed previously in a lot of detail.
some senior members spent a lot of time on it.

The person who initiated this thread has been banned; the starting statements of the thread are down right Juvenile.

so why continue with this ?
why not just search the details ?

Oh ok.....Thanks for the explanation..
If the powers up above,the Moderators lock the thread or merge it into the thread you mentioned...Wont that be a good thing to do? If as you say this idea had been discussed to death,already...
You can help us by posting a link to the previous thread.........
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Shaheen II has built in capability to perform evasive maneuvers. Plus the distance between the borders is not that long. A 2% success rate for Shaheen II is highly pessimistic. You're probably looking at a 2% rate of success for the ABM, not for Shaheen II.
 
Last edited:
. .
Frm wat i hear Shaheen IIs range can be increased to 3500KM with reduction in payload.

It's common sense, reducing load will boost your range.......but they are already working on Shaheen which will be MIRV.

Multiple vehicles are much more difficult to track....and when there are more than one MIRV missiles, the headache for ABMs just add up.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom