ANPP
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- -1
The Fact Is AMCA gives NO Clear Operational Advantage to IAF, You Are Confused with fighters and there Roles.
How "AURA" and Other UCAV's will the gap of LCA's ? When LCA is meant for Interception, Point Defence and Escorting Roles.
To Bridge the Gap Of between Low end and High End Fighters Iaf will have 126 + (x) No's Of Rafales, and Those are not Low in numbers. I wonder how YOU came to that conclusion. IAF don't Need Another type of fighter to replace Few squadrons of Migs and Jaguars. When Rafales ,AURA and Other UCAV's will fill the gap. Poor Planing!
>> LCA is meant for Interception, Point Defence and Escorting Roles. Thats the initial requirement of IAF which was changed after 2003 when LCA got few structural change becz of new requirement. Now it serve as a pure multi role not just pont defence & I think interception quality was either remove or decreases. You can see these changes through its develoment scheme. UAVS are able to perform CAS, airpatroling & another task easily so they are also good as light weight fighter.
>> & also see my another post, you will find your answer. & dont forget these birds means to be for future not now where tech is its hole new form.