What's new

India’s air defence upgrades are eroding Pakistan’s offensive capability

Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
1,460
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
INDIA’S AIR DEFENCE EFFORTS ARE ERODING PAKISTAN’S OFFENSIVE ABILITY
ShareTweet

Through its deployment of land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) and various ballistic missiles, Pakistan stated that it is maintaining “minimum credible deterrence.” However, while that might be accurate in terms of its nuclear deployment capability, Pakistan’s conventional deterrence is at risk of eroding.

By ‘conventional deterrence,’ we refer to Pakistan’s ability to leverage its conventional capabilities – such as airstrikes, deploy armoured columns, or launch conventional warheads at long-range – to dissuade its adversary India from instigating a potential conflict through a pre-emptive strike.

The main causes for this erosion of capability stem from multiple factors, but the most pressing problem, at least in the near-term, is India’s significant investment in ground-based air defence systems. This would include the flagship, the S-400, and an assortment of other potent solutions, such as the Barak 8.

The Impact of India’s Air Defence Efforts
In response to its airstrike on Balakot, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) undertook a retaliatory air campaign – designated “Swift Retort” – centered on its core assets, namely the F-16, JF-17, Mirage III/5, Falcon DA-20 electronic warfare (EW) jammer, and Erieye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system.

Whatever the intent of Swift Retort, it was without a doubt a template of an offensive counter-air (OCA) package. Moreover, with some element of surprise to India (such as the disproportionate size of the OCA force), the PAF had demonstrated a credible offensive capability should India trigger a conflict.

However, the PAF’s ability to exercise that capability is eroding in the face of India’s growing investment in ground-based air defence systems (adding to its significant spending on new multi-role fighters).

The most significant of these new air defence assets is the S-400. In 2018, India signed the $5.5 billion USD contract with Russia for the long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system. While the S-400 is best known for the 40N6 missile, which offers a range of up to 400 km, it is in fact a multi-layered solution comprising of various SAMs, including the 250 km 48NG, 120 km 9M96E2 and 40 km 9M96E.

Though Washington is opposing the sale, it appears that India is on-track to start receiving the S-400 after 2020, according to the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical-Cooperation.[1]

In addition to linking the S-400 into an integrated air defence ground environment (ADGE), which will see it draw on gap filler radars (to plugin blind spots of the S-400’s long-range, high-altitude radar), India will also deploy the Barak 8-based MRSAM platform at-scale through the 2020s. The baseline Barak 8 offers a range of up to 70 km.[2] Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is also developing a long-range variant of the Barak-8, i.e., the Barak 8ER, which could potentially have a range of up to 150 km[3]…

Source:
https://quwa.org/2019/11/10/indias-air-defence-efforts-are-eroding-pakistans-offensive-ability-2/
 
.
After India's humiliation in February they were bound to run around like headless chickens Inna buying spree trying to cover all the holes Pakistan punched in their dillusions

It's important Pakistan keeps increasing its offensive options and holds some tricks up it's sleeve to hit the Indians again next time
 
. . . . .
Minimum deterrence will always be maintained. Just because India is buying S400 does not mean Pakistan's counter punch will be eroded. China has S400, turkey has it, PAF pilots will get plenty of opportunities to train against this system. I am not implying that S400 is not a threat however all airforce prepare for offensive and counter offensive. PAF is not different. Plus stand off weapons will also play a huge role. If anything operation swift resort did show how Pakistan employed its stand off weapons while also showed India messed up terribly in using their SAM assets under pressure.
 
.
Minimum deterrence will always be maintained. Just because India is buying S400 does not mean Pakistan's counter punch will be eroded. China has S400, turkey has it, PAF pilots will get plenty of opportunities to train against this system. I am not implying that S400 is not a threat however all airforce prepare for offensive and counter offensive. PAF is not different. Plus stand off weapons will also play a huge role. If anything operation swift resort did show how Pakistan employed its stand off weapons while also showed India messed up terribly in using their SAM assets under pressure.
Missile swarm followed by airstrikes. And S-400 would be no more.
 
. .
INDIA’S AIR DEFENCE EFFORTS ARE ERODING PAKISTAN’S OFFENSIVE ABILITY
ShareTweet

Through its deployment of land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) and various ballistic missiles, Pakistan stated that it is maintaining “minimum credible deterrence.” However, while that might be accurate in terms of its nuclear deployment capability, Pakistan’s conventional deterrence is at risk of eroding.

By ‘conventional deterrence,’ we refer to Pakistan’s ability to leverage its conventional capabilities – such as airstrikes, deploy armoured columns, or launch conventional warheads at long-range – to dissuade its adversary India from instigating a potential conflict through a pre-emptive strike.

The main causes for this erosion of capability stem from multiple factors, but the most pressing problem, at least in the near-term, is India’s significant investment in ground-based air defence systems. This would include the flagship, the S-400, and an assortment of other potent solutions, such as the Barak 8.

The Impact of India’s Air Defence Efforts
In response to its airstrike on Balakot, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) undertook a retaliatory air campaign – designated “Swift Retort” – centered on its core assets, namely the F-16, JF-17, Mirage III/5, Falcon DA-20 electronic warfare (EW) jammer, and Erieye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system.

Whatever the intent of Swift Retort, it was without a doubt a template of an offensive counter-air (OCA) package. Moreover, with some element of surprise to India (such as the disproportionate size of the OCA force), the PAF had demonstrated a credible offensive capability should India trigger a conflict.

However, the PAF’s ability to exercise that capability is eroding in the face of India’s growing investment in ground-based air defence systems (adding to its significant spending on new multi-role fighters).

The most significant of these new air defence assets is the S-400. In 2018, India signed the $5.5 billion USD contract with Russia for the long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system. While the S-400 is best known for the 40N6 missile, which offers a range of up to 400 km, it is in fact a multi-layered solution comprising of various SAMs, including the 250 km 48NG, 120 km 9M96E2 and 40 km 9M96E.

Though Washington is opposing the sale, it appears that India is on-track to start receiving the S-400 after 2020, according to the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical-Cooperation.[1]

In addition to linking the S-400 into an integrated air defence ground environment (ADGE), which will see it draw on gap filler radars (to plugin blind spots of the S-400’s long-range, high-altitude radar), India will also deploy the Barak 8-based MRSAM platform at-scale through the 2020s. The baseline Barak 8 offers a range of up to 70 km.[2] Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is also developing a long-range variant of the Barak-8, i.e., the Barak 8ER, which could potentially have a range of up to 150 km[3]…

Source:
https://quwa.org/2019/11/10/indias-air-defence-efforts-are-eroding-pakistans-offensive-ability-2/

Since creation of Pakistan, India is trying but decaying herself rather than eroding Pakistan ... India will never ever succeed in her evil designs - In-Shaa-Allah.
 
. .
Minimum deterrence will always be maintained. Just because India is buying S400 does not mean Pakistan's counter punch will be eroded. China has S400, turkey has it, PAF pilots will get plenty of opportunities to train against this system. I am not implying that S400 is not a threat however all airforce prepare for offensive and counter offensive. PAF is not different. Plus stand off weapons will also play a huge role. If anything operation swift resort did show how Pakistan employed its stand off weapons while also showed India messed up terribly in using their SAM assets under pressure.
Range is the problem. S 400 has the range
 
.
I dont think use of CM 400 like hypersonic missile will be limited to Naval air arm only. with a swarm of hypersonic missiles and other weapons air defence umbrella will be punctured in various spaces. India wont deploy s400 near border or for battlefield defence. And modern weapons are evolving at an equal pace.
 
.
I dont think use of CM 400 like hypersonic missile will be limited to Naval air arm only. with a swarm of hypersonic missiles and other weapons air defence umbrella will be punctured in various spaces. India wont deploy s400 near border or for battlefield defence. And modern weapons are evolving at an equal pace.
Long range MLRS is the best solution for Pakistan at destroying strategic Indian targets including airbases. There are 290 KM range MLRS that can reach fair inside of India and destroy aircraft before they can take off.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom