Someone spoke of Republic World earlier. I have a video (unedited), because listening to it made me sick to my stomach. But i'll let you all to judge.
But before you do watch the video, I just want to take your take on it. If a show has the word 'Debate' attached to it, what exactly does it mean - to you (the general viewer)? And should the host remain neutral and let the respective guests go at each other (occasionally ask the relevant questions)?
Now here we have...:
Channel: Republic World
Show: The Debate With Arnab Goswami
Anchor: Arnab Goswami
Topic: India Warns Pak On Parakram Parv / #SurgicalStrikeWarning
Date: 28 Sept., 2018
If you are not interested in watching the entire video, kindly scroll to the time codes...:
04:10 - Where the host,
Arnab Goswami makes his Opening Statement to his (Pakistani) guests and Pakistan Army.
05:15 -
(Retd.) General Dayyal, perhaps a hero in the eyes of the Indian public starts off and believe it or not goes on a tirade
till 07:30. [I swear, I thought the man was gonna have a heart attack, I shit-you-not].
There is quite a bit in between, but the thing that I thought was shameful and perhaps the Indians on this board might agree with me...was what followed on later.
21:50 - The host brings in what he claims is 'the best news'...
23:43 - That is a low point for the common Indian. Mr. Goswami says, "I want to see the faces of those Pakistani guests.". Wow, what ethics as a journalist. ZERO decorum.
We (Pakistan) know no such surgical strike took place. Indian public knows that no such strike took place.
Its pretty obvious whats going. People are looking to get re-elected.