Japan U-22 beats Mexico 4-1

Well, Asian teams beating european team is a normal thing nowadays, but beating S. American team, whaddya think @jhungary ?

 

[REhorror]

330k launch on steam is for the Early Access, mind you it still twice the number of all time teak for AC6

View attachment 962432

AC6 Steam DB tag

View attachment 962433

Starfield Steam DB tag

And lol starfield does not have good score? First of all, set aside this is just one matrix, you are here, with a straight face, telling me AC6 score 88 on Metacritic while Starfield score 86 means they aren't good? User score don't generally mean anything, because you are talking about the longevity of the game because A.) It can be manipulated, B.) People are looking at things differently, it never well rounded. On the other hand, Starfield launched with a lot of bug, I crashed lik every 2 hours playing Starfield on my Xbox, but that does not mean it is a bad game, because bug can be fixed, and that's why they put it on Gamepass to be honest, which is traditionally what Bethesda do, same with any title they made.

About football, as I said, maybe you are a fan of U-23? I don't know, but your "association" of U-23 to actual strength of the national team is just plainly naive, and then you are talking about defeating Mexico or Canada like Japan had defeated the champion of the world.. Australia did defeat THE CHAMPION OF THE WORLD France in U-23 and I don't see that as any achievement. I have no issue you enjoy defeating Mexico 4 1 in a Under 23 friendlies, I mean go nuts for the celebration for all I care, but thinking that means something other than this is absurd. And frankly, that's copium on thinking Japan is on par with European or South American Powerhouse level because they defeated Canada and Mexico in U-23.....

Yeah, OK bro.
I have said in the previous post that yes, Starfield's 330K peak is higher than AC6's 150K peak, this is truth.

What is also truth is that SF is much lower-received than AC6, both critically and user-wise if we compare their Metacritic scores (83 vs 86 on Metacritic, or more accurately, 72 vs. 89% on Steam).

And recently, Japan NT has beaten Germany, Turkey, Canada, and their U22 has beaten Mexico's U22, I do think a little celebration is warranted for asian soccer.

 

[jhungary]

Yeah, OK bro.
I have said in the previous post that yes, Starfield's 330K peak is higher than AC6's 150K peak, this is truth.

What is also truth is that SF is much lower-received than AC6, both critically and user-wise if we compare their Metacritic scores (83 vs 86 on Metacritic, or more accurately, 72 vs. 89% on Steam).

And recently, Japan NT has beaten Germany, Turkey, Canada, and their U22 has beaten Mexico's U22, I do think a little celebration is warranted for asian soccer.

Again, you want to celebrate anything is up to you, you can think that beating anyone in U-22 and in Friendly is a big achievement, and I don't, and frankly, people probably going to laugh at you if they saw this post and they are serious about soccer.

As for Starfield and AC6, user score does not mean anything nor everything, I can think of a few games that didn't really took off or felt straight back down to earth, Valheim, for example, is a stellar game with good score (90+ in Metacritic IIRC) and beats the crap of both Starfield and AC6 in download, but it was hardly ever played now mostly because lack of content. You can't dominate with just a single parameter alone. And then some game is just never going to die, like Counter Strike and GTAV

Just don't call me on every time you hear whatever you hear, I don't have time to go over every Friendly win or U-22 match with you.

 

[REhorror]

Again, you want to celebrate anything is up to you, you can think that beating anyone in U-22 and in Friendly is a big achievement, and I don't, and frankly, people probably going to laugh at you if they saw this post and they are serious about soccer.

As for Starfield and AC6, user score does not mean anything nor everything, I can think of a few games that didn't really took off or felt straight back down to earth, Valheim, for example, is a stellar game with good score (90+ in Metacritic IIRC) and beats the crap of both Starfield and AC6 in download, but it was hardly ever played now mostly because lack of content. You can't dominate with just a single parameter alone. And then some game is just never going to die, like Counter Strike and GTAV

Just don't call me on every time you hear whatever you hear, I don't have time to go over every Friendly win or U-22 match with you.

Yeah, OK bro, I just call you because it has something to do with Mexico.
About SF vs. AC6, I have said all I said. Both are primariy single player games too (AC6 has some PvP content which will remain), and people move on when they finish them, but it doesn't change that SF is critically panned compared to AC6.

 

[jhungary]

Yeah, OK bro, I just call you because it has something to do with Mexico.
About SF vs. AC6, I have said all I said. Both are primariy single player games too (AC6 has some PvP content which will remain), and people move on when they finish them, but it doesn't change that SF is critically panned compared to AC6.

Didn't I already said the last time Mexico did not desert the ranking they had.

And again, SF is not critically panned, either you don't know what "Critically" mean or you are ignorant to the facts. They can't be "Critically" panned and be considered Game Award game of the year in 2023, it would be hard and a tough asked for them to win as I can think of a few other game better than Starfield, but nobody would considered AC6 as GOTY material, and then you keep talking about SF is critically panned compared to AC6.

Can Starfield win the Game of the Year award?

Bethesda Game Studios' space opera RPG, Starfield, has received a mostly warm welcome from gamers.

www.sportskeeda.com

Top Contenders for Game of the Year 2023 Awards

With the Game Awards 2023 etching closer, speculations surrounding GOTY contenders continue to make rounds about this year's winner.

www.essentiallysports.com

 

[REhorror]

Didn't I already said the last time Mexico did not desert the ranking they had.

And again, SF is not critically panned, either you don't know what "Critically" mean or you are ignorant to the facts. They can't be "Critically" panned and be considered Game Award game of the year in 2023, it would be hard and a tough asked for them to win as I can think of a few other game better than Starfield, but nobody would considered AC6 as GOTY material, and then you keep talking about SF is critically panned compared to AC6.

Can Starfield win the Game of the Year award?

Bethesda Game Studios' space opera RPG, Starfield, has received a mostly warm welcome from gamers.

www.sportskeeda.com

Top Contenders for Game of the Year 2023 Awards

With the Game Awards 2023 etching closer, speculations surrounding GOTY contenders continue to make rounds about this year's winner.

www.essentiallysports.com

SF is pretty much the worst rating Bethesda game since Fallout 76, bro, both critically and user-wise. If it does win any award, it just shows that the award show is rigged.

AC6 has also been nominated for Best Storytelling AND Playstation GOTY award in Golden Joystick Awards: https://www.gamesradar.com/goldenjoystickawards/

See you in the Game Awards this December.

 

[jhungary]

SF is pretty much the worst rating Bethesda game since Fallout 76, bro, both critically and user-wise. If it does win any award, it just shows that the award show is rigged.

AC6 has also been nominated for Best Storytelling AND Playstation GOTY award in Golden Joystick Awards: https://www.gamesradar.com/goldenjoystickawards/

See you in the Game Awards this December.

Yes, anything not according to your liking is rigged. It didn't matter if the game sold more, it didn't matter about consensus

And I am talking about game award, not golden joystick, Starfield had been nominated in Golden Joystick award before the game even released.

 

[REhorror]

Yes, anything not according to your liking is rigged. It didn't matter if the game sold more, it didn't matter about consensus

And I am talking about game award, not golden joystick, Starfield had been nominated in Golden Joystick award before the game even released.

Except the consensus is that the game sucks, this shows in both critical reviews and user reviews. You are trying to force a panned game to become GOTY lol.

And Golden Joystick Awards 2023 nomination (29 Sep 2023) comes AFTER the SF release date (Sep 6 2023), nice try.

 

[jhungary]

Except the consensus is that the game sucks, this shows in both critical reviews and user reviews. You are trying to force a panned game to become GOTY lol.

And Golden Joystick Awards 2023 nomination (29 Sep 2023) comes AFTER the SF release date (Sep 6 2023), nice try.

First of all, if by your definition of "Sucks" then the score would also indicated AC6 sucks. Both are 80+, so it cannot be one sucks and one don't

Second of all, it's not me who try to get Starfield buzz, it's gaming magazine in their review, it's not me who said that, the only mention of AC6 and Game of the Year is a single reddit post...

And finally, if you ever check the Golden Joystick website, they don't just award best games award, they also award category such as Most Wanted Game which Starfield had been nominated since 2021

Time is running out to cast your vote in the Golden Joystick Awards 2022

Horizon Forbidden West, Splatoon 3, and Final Fantasy 14 are also up for multiple awards

www.gamesradar.com

AC6 weren't even on the list, and Starfield is nominated for 3 category vs Armored Core 6's 2

The Golden Joystick Awards 2023 – here are the nominees in full

Baldur’s Gate 3 and The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom lead the way in an exceptional year for games

www.gamesradar.com

So yes, a panned game get more nomination of a good game according to you. LOL

 

[REhorror]

First of all, if by your definition of "Sucks" then the score would also indicated AC6 sucks. Both are 80+, so it cannot be one sucks and one don't

Second of all, it's not me who try to get Starfield buzz, it's gaming magazine in their review, it's not me who said that, the only mention of AC6 and Game of the Year is a single reddit post...

And finally, if you ever check the Golden Joystick website, they don't just award best games award, they also award category such as Most Wanted Game which Starfield had been nominated since 2021

Time is running out to cast your vote in the Golden Joystick Awards 2022

Horizon Forbidden West, Splatoon 3, and Final Fantasy 14 are also up for multiple awards

www.gamesradar.com

View attachment 962479

AC6 weren't even on the list, and Starfield is nominated for 3 category vs Armored Core 6's 2

The Golden Joystick Awards 2023 – here are the nominees in full

Baldur’s Gate 3 and The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom lead the way in an exceptional year for games

www.gamesradar.com

View attachment 962480


View attachment 962481

View attachment 962482

So yes, a panned game get more nomination of a good game according to you. LOL

AC6 is much less hyped and has less of a budget than Starfield, that's true, Starfield is a first party title and has been hyped for many years, and it turns out to be a major disappointment (as said, the worst Beth critically rated game since Fallout 76, which is also a major stinker).

And again, let's look at the user score's disprepancy, it's clear which game the actual players enjoy more.

And you are right about the Golden Stick nominations, tho, I have no idea how Starfield can get into Best Audio or Best Visual design when AC6 have it much superior, oh well, rigged I'd call it.

 

[jhungary]

AC6 is much less hyped and has less of a budget than Starfield, that's true, Starfield is a first party title and has been hyped for many years, and it turns out to be a major disappointment (as said, the worst Beth critically rated game since Fallout 76, which is also a major stinker).

And again, let's look at the user score's disprepancy, it's clear which game the actual players enjoy more.

And you are right about the Golden Stick nominations, tho, I have no idea how Starfield can get into Best Audio or Best Visual design when AC6 have it much superior, oh well, rigged I'd call it.

Again, user score does not mean anything, that's why game award uses professional review and profession panel from gaming industry instead of pulling a bunch of Joe, Jack and Emma Gamer from the street and weight those game.

I mean if you think Starfield is an inferior game than AC6, I have no objection, as I said, you are in a minority here, but if you actually think that way, that's yours thinking. I played both, and AC6 get bored about it very quickly, at least I can tell you the storyline in Starfield have a lot of replay-ability on them, not to mention you have 2 or 3 times the storyline in Starfield than AC6.

And finally, as I said, just because something you don't like it's does not mean it is rigged. Again, unless you are professional enough to judge these events, you and I, as regular gamer has no say on them. We can either play or not play those game. And I am not going to reply to you on this anymore.

 

[REhorror]

Again, user score does not mean anything, that's why game award uses professional review and profession panel from gaming industry instead of pulling a bunch of Joe, Jack and Emma Gamer from the street and weight those game.

I mean if you think Starfield is an inferior game than AC6, I have no objection, as I said, you are in a minority here, but if you actually think that way, that's yours thinking. I played both, and AC6 get bored about it very quickly, at least I can tell you the storyline in Starfield have a lot of replay-ability on them, not to mention you have 2 or 3 times the storyline in Starfield than AC6.

And finally, as I said, just because something you don't like it's does not mean it is rigged. Again, unless you are professional enough to judge these events, you and I, as regular gamer has no say on them. We can either play or not play those game. And I am not going to reply to you on this anymore.

User scores matter more to them, professional game/film reviewers are shill, but you know that already.

And again, I'm not a minority here for thinking AC6 is a better than Starfield, considering even these shills rate SF lower than AC6 LOL.

And again, rigging is rampant in awards show, this has been a thing since the Oscars. If something does not deserve the nomination/award, I'm gonna call it riggerd, simple as.

EDIT: About the story tho, SF's story might beat AC6 in length, but woo boy, nobody is gonna say SF has a good story LOL, it's even worse than Skyrim.

 

[jhungary]

User scores matter more to them, professional game/film reviewers are shill, but you know that already.

And again, I'm not a minority here for thinking AC6 is a better than Starfield, considering even these shills rate SF lower than AC6 LOL.

And again, rigging is rampant in awards show, this has been a thing since the Oscars. If something does not deserve the nomination/award, I'm gonna call it riggerd, simple as.

EDIT: About the story tho, SF's story might beat AC6 in length, but woo boy, nobody is gonna say SF has a good story LOL, it's even worse than Skyrim.

yeah, so when are Academy Award going to depends on user review instead of a President Panel to nominate film? When are Emmy going to do that? When is Brits award going to do that? I mean not even Golden Horse uses user review for film nomination, but yeah, you think they are important.

And if a game have more fan based, sold more copies, and have more nomination is inferior simply because of its user score, and I will call whoever said that stupid, simple as.

I am not going to go into what you like and what you don't like, so I am out.

 

[REhorror]

yeah, so when are Academy Award going to depends on user review instead of a President Panel to nominate film? When are Emmy going to do that? When is Brits award going to do that? I mean not even Golden Horse uses user review for film nomination, but yeah, you think they are important.

And if a game have more fan based, sold more copies, and have more nomination is inferior simply because of its user score, and I will call whoever said that stupid, simple as.

I am not going to go into what you like and what you don't like, so I am out.

Yeah bro, it's not like "Oscar bait" isn't a thing.
And I'd trust user reviews way over "professional reviews" LOL.

My evidence: the shitshow called Starfield, and before that, probably Cyberpunk 2077.

 

[jhungary]

Yeah bro, it's not like "Oscar bait" isn't a thing.
And I'd trust user reviews way over "professional reviews" LOL.

My evidence: the shitshow called Starfield, and before that, probably Cyberpunk 2077.

That's exactly what a loser losing out the award from any award show will say. LOL

Anyway, I had my fun, moving on, don't need to reply to me again, and I am going to ignore you in general from now on.

 

[REhorror]

That's what a loser losing out the award from any award show will say. LOL

Anyway, I had my fun, moving on, don't need to reply to me again, and I am going to ignore you in general from now on.

OK bro, but if you don't believe there's rigging involved in Oscar and Game Awards (where somehow The Last of Us 2 managed to win GOTY over something like Ghost of Tsushima), I have a bridge to sell to you.