What's new

Indian shelling in tatta pani.Pakistani Soldier Havaldar Mohyudin martyred

Seems alert been issued at entire border. Same here in Thar border.
 
.
542209_405151889564036_1597926214_n.jpg
 
.
Let's not bring Kargil here, it was a covert Op. If we want to explore that line then India set the precedent. Stating that India was not supporting the Mukti Bahini and before you know it, Ta-Da! what do you know, India was behind it all along! So let's not act all "Holier than Though" and next time, actually bring proof if you wish to allege any wrong doing. In a world where you even need references on your school assignment, something as serious as a torture allegation, just wont stick without an autopsy report.

You are right, lets not go there & leave it at that.

Coz if Mukti Bahini is spoken of then refrences shall be made of Ayub's plan to insert paratroopers in J&K in 65 which backfired & they were caught.Op Gibraltar .. was it ?

Ppl might even talk of the PA action into J&K in 47 -48 when they entered J&K state after it acceded to India..

There's that line from a Mukesh song :

" Zikr hota hai jab Kayamat ke, tere jalwon ki baat hoti hai.."
 
. .
Why... reading MISSION KASHMIR OVER is too painful for you?

Yes the grammatical structure of that term is way off & English was always my favorite subject ! :tup:
@Hyperion : What do your sources say ? :what:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Kargil was in 1999.....the stand off which proved soul destroying for IA was in 2002.


BJP had the balls to do something yes it cost us alot of money for mobilization but we did something this Congress Govt will just twiddle their thumbs they proved so after 26/11.
 
.
Pakistani Posters here why are you Feeding the Indian Trolls here ? who are living in their own World . Please Ignore them , there are more serious issues on hand then to entertain some brats who have no Idea what the Hell is going on.
 
.
Scenario 1: We relapse to the 2002-03 sitaution, shell the **** out of each other, maybe go to war.

There was another one after Mumbai attacks if I remember correctly.

Alot of officers got transferred temporarily, to the border areas and EME units were moved for support.
 
.
You are right, lets not go there & leave it at that.

Coz if Mukti Bahini is spoken of then refrences shall be made of Ayub's plan to insert paratroopers in J&K in 65 which backfired & they were caught.Op Gibraltar .. was it ?

Ppl might even talk of the PA action into J&K in 47 -48 when they entered J&K state after it acceded to India..

There's that line from a Mukesh song :

" Zikr hota hai jab Kayamat ke, tere jalwon ki baat hoti hai.."

Already answered in an earlier post.
 
.
What's the news on Pakistan side of border on Thar and Punjab region ?
 
.
@Hyperion : What do your sources say ? :what:


Dude, I don't have any such 'sources', the cousins and relatives that I have in the armed forces are thorough professionals and gentlemen. They'd never discuss any such thing with me. Even if they were in active engagement, they'd say "hello beta, theek thaak ho?" And that's all that I'd get out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Or this whole thing could be a ruse by the Pakistani army to take heat of that Tuesday incident and try putting India on defensive. I mean no one has seen the dead body of the Pakistani soldier right ?

Seems the Indians on the streets have forgotten about the rape epidemic and now are protesting against Pakistan.....not difficult to conclude who is desperate to divert attention from internal issues.
 
.
2002 was the last time the two countries faced each other, the stand off lasted almost a year but Indians paid a heavy price for their misadventure. !!



Casualties

The standoff inflicted heavy casualties. 789[21] to 1874[22] Indian soldiers died during the conflict, and more than 100 more were injured. Around 100 soldiers were killed in the initial phase of laying mines, another 250 were injured. The remaining casualties were a result of artillery duels with Pakistan and vehicle accidents. The Pakistani losses were estimated to be about 34 casualties and 10 injuries.

[edit]Cost of standoff

The Indian cost for the buildup was 21,600 crore (US$3.93 billion) being much greater than that of Pakistani $1.4 billion

AS per report in parliament,there was 1 casualty and 30-40 got injured :blah: blah:

i myself read it
 
. .
The standoff inflicted heavy casualties. 789[21] to 1874[22] Indian soldiers died during the conflict, and more than 100 more were injured. Around 100 soldiers were killed in the initial phase of laying mines, another 250 were injured. The remaining casualties were a result of artillery duels with Pakistan and vehicle accidents. The Pakistani losses were estimated to be about 34 casualties and 10 injuries.
We all know the accuracy of Pakistani reports of casualties.. a couple hundred declared dead in Kargil against the real loss of close to 4000 men (as stated by the then Prime Minister of Pakistan).

[edit]Cost of standoff

The Indian cost for the buildup was 21,600 crore (US$3.93 billion) being much greater than that of Pakistani $1.4 billion

What % was 3.93 billion of Indian defense budget and what % was 1.4 billion of Pakistan's ;) ?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom