Indian Patriot
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,000
- Reaction score
- -23
- Country
- Location
The privatisation must only happen in cleanliness, reservation and upgrading the stations.. Not the railways. We actually do not require High speed trains. It will increase the cost , and people will rather fly by air .. and those who live in interiar will have to pay more.
A high speed train operation will cost the railways a lot and cannot become the basic mode of railways operation.
I have seen pessimists but you sir take the cake.
India does not need high speed trains or super-fast trains but India needs AC shopping malls, 4D cinema halls, Starbucks coffee shops and other cosmetic things that make India look "developed". Indians have no sense or value of time?
Metros were introduced in Delhi to give faster commuting options to Delhites. The metro does not charge 1000 rupees for travel and traveling 15 km in metro is cheaper than traveling 15 km in bus or auto. If you are so scared about costs then why don't you protest against Palace on Wheels, Deccan Queen etc. Special tourist trains that charge Rs 100,000 per night journey? If people have so much money why not stay in 5 star hotels?
If you had an option you would even remove the Rajdhani express, after all why should Indians enjoy fast trains? Indians do not need modern railway engines because they are expensive, steam engines are working fine for India.
Every time somebody wants an improves India there are 10,000 others to pull him down.
Reason India cannot build high-speed or super-fast railways is India does not have the money. Some of the excuses by my compatriots is so hilarious that it will be sad if they genuinely believe them.
The world is moving towards progress and modernity but some people are allergic to development.
Ironically "communist" China is more welcoming to business developments than "capitalist" India.