What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

neutral media person like Rajdeep SarDesai:
Rajdeep - 2002 - Desai is neutral?
A man who spent his entire career trying and failing to demonize Modi

Times Cow or Re-poop-lick and all your Sanghi medias and Cowswamy's are the neutrals? Really?

If Times Now, Republic, Arnab are right leaning then NDTV, Rajdeep and company are left leaning. Dont call them neutral. Atleast Republic openly declares it is a Nationalist Channel. Why doesnt NDTV say it is a leftist channel?

No journalist in today's time is neutral. Earlier what used to happen was that these "journalists" used to influence govt policy (Nira Radia anyone). Now the current govt does not give them any ghas phooos. No free trips with the PM no exclusive interviews, no inside sccops, no leaks etc. not only lutyens media even right leaning channels dont get it

So what the lutyens media is now doing is to try and push its agenda using "sources" and these made up sources are their drivers and maids and neices and nephews.




 
.
India never claimed to be a perfect country....and for what it's worth I doubt it ever will be.

Pakistan claims to be a country run by God's laws for the glory of the Almighty - surely better than anything made by man - their standard should be much higher than ours.
Yes, that is what Pakistanis believes. But I don't think you believe in Pakistani's God, so why are you comparing yourself with something you don't believe in.

Compare India with other impoverished illiterate colonized countries that achieved independence from an European empire 70 years ago ( and that would include Pakistan) and India would defenitely fall among the most successful and tolerant of such countries.
And that includes countries like Singapore, Malaysia etc which are doing much better than India. Not sure why you left them out. And when we compare ourselves, we try to compare with similar attributes. Pakistan was never a proper functioning democracy nor a secular country, so the comparison is absurd.

We do not commit genocide such as in Rwanda
We do not prevent minorities from wearing clothing of their choice, fasting or growing beards etc unlike a country that cannot be criticized on PDF.
We do not have armed groups doing mass rape and cutting organs out of living women like in the Congo
Our government is not run by drug lords like in Colombia
We are not an international pariah like Cuba
We do not have half the population dying of aids such as Zimbabwe
We never had dictatorships like Philippines
We did not go insane like N Korea
We are not run by mullahs like Iran or Saudi
We did not waste all our natural resources like Venezuela
We are not bankrupt or overtaken by undesirables as in countries that cannot be named without getting banned
We did have our own set of genocides, for example the Jammu massacre and The Police action in Hyderabad to name a few and I am not even including Gujarat 2002.
We may not prevent our minorities from practicing their religion(All thanks to our constitution) but we have our own set of drawbacks which makes their lives harder(The recent events are some examples)

And for the rest of your comments, well I agree we are doing well compared to them but why look at worse instances, why not the best examples(Ex. Singapore)

Compare with like countries. If you compare India with Norway - a country of a few million lemon heads floating on North Sea oil, highly educated and ethnically so unvaried that the entire population is related to each other - well what can I say dude - we don't match up !
Hence I am comparing with countries who got freedom and have similar government forms. Not sure how is Pakistan similar to us other than the fact that they got independence at a similar time as us. But apart from that they are very different from us.
 
.
We did have our own set of genocides, for example the Jammu massacre and The Police action in Hyderabad to name a few and I am not even including Gujarat 2002.

And you completely ignored the only genocide that actually happened, Hindus of Kashmir.
Do you even know the difference between a genocide and communal violence?

Genocide - When one side kills other without the other side being able to even lift a finger. Kashmiri Muslims of genocide of Hindus falls in this category since not one muslim was ever killed by a Kashmiri hindu.
Communal Violence - the 2002 travesty that happened after Muslims burned a train full of Hindu woman & Children. Both sides had victims.

Hope there is some clarity.
 
.
Yes, that is what Pakistanis believes. But I don't think you believe in Pakistani's God, so why are you comparing yourself with something you don't believe in.

A few years back I remember reading a story in a Pakistani newspaper about a chrisitain couple who ran foul of the local villagers. The wife was 6 months pregnant. The villagers got together, dragged the couple to a brick kiln, broke their knee caps so they could not move and stoked up the fire in the kiln. It took them 5 hours to collect enough fuel to that, meanwhile the young couple with broken knee caps begged for mercy. Once the fire was strong enough they threw them on - one by one - crying and struggling. The pregnant lady asking that they at least spare her unborn child. Not one person in that mob ever spent a day in prison.

Tell me where were your lot when this was happening?

Who took your tongue?

Where was your righteous indignation?

When gods chosen people who fast and guard their minds against the smallest sin. Even cover their bodies so carefully that no other person would commit sin even in their minds. Whose laws were brought down from heaven by a shining angel as a solution to all problems of man.

When these people do what they did above - why is your silence so DEAFENING?

You hold us up to our manmade infallible laws but a free pass to gods chosen people? What does it matter whether we believe they are chosen or not? Everyone should be held up equally to their OWN standards. Us to our inferior manmade ones and them to the superior ones they received from the holy arch angel himself.

Explain your silence on one but not the other.
 
. .
A few years back I remember reading a story in a Pakistani newspaper about a chrisitain couple who ran foul of the local villagers. The wife was 6 months pregnant. The villagers got together, dragged the couple to a brick kiln, broke their knee caps so they could not move and stoked up the fire in the kiln. It took them 5 hours to collect enough fuel to that, meanwhile the young couple with broken knee caps begged for mercy. Once the fire was strong enough they threw them on - one by one - crying and struggling. The pregnant lady asking that they at least spare her unborn child. Not one person in that mob ever spent a day in prison.

Tell me where were your lot when this was happening?

Who took your tongue?

Where was your righteous indignation?
Now you jump from one conversation to another, so I take it that you don't really have a reason to bring in Pakistani internal affairs to justify the atrocities in India other than your emotional outbursts(Which are selfish anyways). Let me tell you that I can post many similar incidents in India where the brutality was quite similar and infact the brutality surpasses in certain cases. Let me give you some examples(Won't even mention the individual incidents in graphic details).

900 muslims were killed systematically in Bombay and those responsible for it got state salutations/promotions instead of getting punished. A man responsible for deaths of around 2000 innocents presently rules this country. Where is your moral compass?

Why even speak of external world, Let me give an example here on PDF. When I asked your opinion on certain hate filled obnoxious statements by sarthak, you stayed mum over it and willfully ignored them(Forget about condemning) so stop giving that sh!t to me. I know what you are.

When gods chosen people who fast and guard their minds against the smallest sin. Even cover their bodies so carefully that no other person would commit sin even in their minds. Whose laws were brought down from heaven by a shining angel as a solution to all problems of man.

When these people do what they did above - why is your silence so DEAFENING?

You hold us up to our manmade infallible laws but a free pass to gods chosen people? What does it matter whether we believe they are chosen or not? Everyone should be held up equally to their OWN standards. Us to our inferior manmade ones and them to the superior ones they received from the holy arch angel himself.

Explain your silence on one but not the other.
Why the hell are you concerned about something which you don't even believe in? My silence? Unlike you, I have time and again condemned wrongs happening anywhere around the world. And unlike you I never justified/or drew comparisons of such atrocities. So keep your hypocrisy to yourself.
 
Last edited:
.
Now you jump from one conversation to another, so I take it that you don't really have a reason to bring in Pakistani internal affairs to justify the atrocities in India other than your emotional outbursts(Which are selfish anyways). Let me tell you that I can post many similar incidents in India where the brutality was quite similar and infact the brutality surpasses in certain cases. Let me give you some examples(Won't even mention the individual incidents in graphic details).

900 muslims were killed systematically in Bombay and those responsible for it got state salutations/promotions instead of getting punished. A man responsible for deaths of around 2000 innocents presently rules this country. Where is your moral compass?

Why even speak of external world, Let me give an example here on PDF. When I asked your opinion on certain hate filled obnoxious statements by sarthak, you stayed mum over it and willfully ignored them(Forget about condemning) so stop giving that sh!t to me. I know what you are.


Why the hell are you concerned about something which you don't even believe in? My silence? Unlike you, I have time and again condemned wrongs happening anywhere around the world. And unlike you I never justified/or drew comparisons of such atrocities. So keep your hypocrisy to yourself.


Don't throw your fake indignation at me dude. Your kind always do that when they want to avoid answering a question. And don't pretend you didn't understand what I said - you are neither stupid like Jamahir nor a lunatic like Mujahind. You are a militant Indian Muslim voice and you may not believe it, but I will always defend your right to speak your mind though I do not agree with much of what you say.

Let me state again as simply as I know how to.

People should be held up to the standards they themselves espouse.

India claims - it says so in our constitution - that we are a secular democracy. We should be judged by that standard. We OFTEN fall short. Some of the things that have happened in the past in India and continue to happen have no escuse. We need to do better.

Pakistan claims - it says so in whatever booklet is currently passing as its constitution - that it is a country ruled by divine law. IT SHOuLD BE JUDGED BY ITS OWN STANDARDS . AKA GOD'S STANDARDS.

I am not trying to hold up Pakistan to the standards I believe in, I just hold them up to their OWN standards, unlike you.

Do you actually live in India? When that incident with the beef lynching happened, the entire country came to a standstill. For months every paper screamed the same headlines. Every person involved in the lynching are in prison and the victims family have been given a flat in Delhi. Does that make it alright? Hell no! But did we try to live up to our standards, albeit too late? Hell yes!

When the Christian couple were kneecapped and burnt alive in Pakistan - there was a small article in a liberal newspaper then the story sunk like a stone.

India TRIES to live up to its secular standards, often failing miserably as your lot remind us every time you open your mouth. I have never heard the same passion from you condemning those who do not live up to the MUCH HIGHER standards set by Gods law. Who got your tongue then?

about Modis rise - first of all the figure is not 2000 dead. It is more like 700 Muslims and 300 Hindus. Your lot purposely exaggerate this figure for brownie points. Secondly your lot gloss over the fact that 50 pilgrims were burnt alive in a railway carriage by gods chosen people and that similar nonsense has happened several times before. Modis rise is in part a rebellion against Muslims repeatedly using their vote bank status to get away with murder.

Does that escuse what happened in Gujarat? NO it does not. Does it EXPLAIN it, YES it does.

How come the followers of the God of compassion and mercy cannot find it in their selfish little hearts to hand over the temple of the birth place of Ram? - one of the most important gods of the Hindu pantheon - If your lot had been more generous about that, Modi would still be selling tea at a railway station because no one would be buying his ideology for sure.

If India had been Sweden, we would have weeded out the idiology that claims that it is OK to roast infidels who hold viewpoints not to our liking. But India is not Sweden, it is an illiterate, superstitious, poverty laden, semi formed nation state. - too many of us still pooping on the road in the 21st century. We can only try and that we do.


What is with this sarthak thingy? Can you point me to the place where I ignored something truly gross he said? I am not saying I didn't do that, but I don't remember. Much as it is hard for you to believe, I do not normally agree with or like open bigotry.
 
Last edited:
.
19399910_1511708522225366_136062702814013876_n.jpg


Forty Two Years After the Emergency, India’s Democracy is Once Again in Danger
adityanath-759.jpg

[snipped..excerpts]--->
Then and now

In sharp contrast today, the Narendra Modi government is driving the country towards an Emergency with a cold blooded efficiency that has only unflattering historical parallels. In one of the first speeches he gave after coming to power, Modi referred to his plans for the next 10 years in terms that belied any possibility of there being a change of government or prime minister. Since then, many of his ministers, and his party president Amit Shah, have made similar statements.

This is because they see their function as being the transformational one of exorcising the weakness in the Indian, specifically Hindu, psyche that has led to its centuries of “enslavement,” and of creating a strong, self-assertive Hindu nation that will command respect through its strength, by inspiring fear. Such a transformation will take time.

To distinguish itself from what they consider their weak-kneed, pseudo-secular predecessor and its cohorts of western educated advisers, this government has plunged the country into a campaign of terror against an unarmed populace in Kashmir; earlier, it engineered an undeclared trade blockade upon Nepal for daring to disregard Modi’s advice on the framing of its constitution, and pushed that country into the arms of China; it has greatly worsened India’s strained relations with Pakistan and destroyed all the progress that Manmohan Singh’s government had made towards letting the border dispute with China fade away behind deepening cooperation on the remaking of the post-cold-war international order.

However, these calculated provocations fade into insignificance before the BJP’s systematic assault upon the rule of law at home. One of the earliest incidents was the planting of a doctored tape showing JNU Student Union president Kanhaiya Kumar allegedly mouthing ‘Pakistan Zindabad’, at a confrontation with the BJP’s student wing, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, on the JNU campus and using it to arrest him and put him in jail. Although voicing pro-Pakistani slogans is not a crime under the Indian Penal Code, and although the tape was exposed by two TV channels to be a fake, the government kept Kumar in jail for three weeks. While he was in police custody, three lawyers belonging to one of the RSS’s shadow organisations, the Adhivakta Sangh, beat him while the police looked on. They then boasted about it to an India Today reporter who carried out a sting operation on them with a hidden camera. But all the police did to them was to invite them to appear at the thana, book them and release them immediately on bail at their own cognisance.

Under the benign umbrella provided by another shadowy organisation from the parivar, the Bharatiya Gau Raksha Dal, hundreds of cow vigilante groups have sprung up all over the country. These have assaulted countless Muslims, Dalits, truckers and cattle transporters and left at least 10 people dead, six of them Muslims. As Human Rights Watch Director for South Asia , Meenakshi Ganguly observed, “The mild admonitions from BJP leaders when Muslims and Dalits are lynched over cows sends a message that the BJP supports this violence. Instead of a government that took office on the promise of universal development, it (Modi’s government) now appears to be one unwilling to protect those most vulnerable.”

The Bharatiya Gau Raksha Dal claims that it has 50 affiliated organisations with about 10,000 volunteers. But hundreds of other self-appointed cow protection groups have sprung up all over the country. Delhi is believed to have 200 such groups, and the Una region of Gujarat is believed to have an equal number. On July 1, 2016, 35 gau rakshaks attacked seven Dalits for skinning a cow that had been killed by a lion, in a village adjoining the Gir forest, accused them of slaughtering it, beat them with iron rods and sticks, then kidnapped four of them, took them to Una, tied them to a car, and flogged them publicly through the town. The perpetrators videographed the beating, replaced their screams with an overlay of soothing western classical music, and uploaded their tape onto YouTube. Seven Dalits were admitted to hospital, but the police just looked on.

The BGRD and the Adhivakta Sangh are only small portions of the stormtrooper army that the RSS has assembled. A third component is the Hindu Yuva Vahini of Gorakhpur, which describes itself as “a fierce cultural and social organisation dedicated to Hindutva and nationalism.” The HYV was created by the Muslim-hating firebrand chief minister of UP, Yogi Adityanath. It has been involved in numerous riots, notably one at Mau in 2005, and was called out by Adityanath to help the police in his first action as chief minister – the closure of what he and the Vahini claimed to be illegal slaughter houses.

Adityanath and his Hindu Yuva Vahini have been the prime instigators of the campaigns of ‘Love Jihad’ and ‘Ghar Wapsi’, both of which were designed to show the Muslims of north India their place in the new dispensation, and resulted in scores of attacks on Muslims and several deaths. But throughout the past three years of Modi’s rule, there have been few arrests, prompt releases on bail and almost no prosecutions. The police and the judges too, have by and large learned which side of their bread has the butter.

Strong-arming rivals

But all this pales before this new RSS/BJP’s utter disregard for the canons of democracy. Smarting under his total rout at Kejriwal’s hands in the 2015 state election Modi launched an assault on the AAP of a kind that has no place in a democracy. This developed in three phases. In the first it concentrated on making the government impotent. Through lieutenant governor Najib Jung, it took the Anti-Corruption Bureau out of the Delhi government’s hand, and closed down the helpline through which the ACB had received 160,000 complaints from the public of extortion by the police and officers of the three municipalities. It followed this with a home ministry circular that took all effective decision making power out of the state governments hands, even on subjects that had nothing to do with the police and land, the two subjects reserved for the central government.

The second phase of the attack was triggered by an extraordinary judgment of a single judge bench of the Delhi high court, that invalidated not one but two articles of the Indian Constitution, 293 and 293A, to bring Delhi (and as collateral damage also Pondicherry) back completely under the Centre’s thumb. Following this Jung seized 400 files and sent anything that could conceivably be considered ‘irregular’, to the CBI to follow up. This was followed by a spatter of accusations of petty irregularities, mostly made through TRP hungry TV channels, and ‘friendly’ print journalists to discredit the government, and create the impression that it was no better, and probably worse than any other.

Modi launched the third phase with direct attacks on Kejriwal and his deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, accusing them of corruption, money laundering and embezzlement of funds as a prelude to splitting the party and forcing it to resign. To do the latter it used two AAP members, Kumar Vishwas and Kapil Mishra, who had come to it from the RSS in the heady days of the “India Against Corruption” movement and kept their ties with it. It would be tedious to describe the details of this attack. Suffice it to say that the main charge, made by Mishra, that he had personally seen Kejriwal receive Rs 2 crore of foreign donations from health minister Satyendra Jain at his house on a particular date, was not corroborated by any of the cctv cameras mounted around the CMs house. This has not prevented the Delhi police from filing no fewer than 29 cases against Kejriwal, the elected chief minister of the state.

Kejriwal is not the only opposition chief minister upon whom Modi and Amit Shah have trained their guns. The ministers of Mamata Banerjee, who is the first chief minister to have publicly recognised the threat that the BJP poses to democracy, have been in the gunsights of the CBI, the Income tax authorities and the enforcement directorate for several months. The common thread in all they are doing is their utter disregard for the rule of law and contempt for the conventions upon which democracy rests. Modi and Shah have to know that anything the BJP does to its political rivals can, and will, be done by them to the BJP when they come to power. With scandals like Vyapam in Madhya Pradesh, and the Rajasthan land scam, there will be ample fodder for the opposition to chew upon. So why are they showing such disregard for what can happen to them in the future? For those who have the courage to look ahead, the answer is staring them in the face: they do not ever expect the opposition to come to power. And that can happen only if democracy is extinguished in India.

Indira Gandhi’s Emergency was only a momentary flash in the pan. The real Emergency lies ahead.
https://thewire.in/151083/forty-two-years-emergency-indias-democracy-danger

undeclared-emergency.png
 
. .
.
Just hear Osho 's Views on Cow slaughter ,30 years back
Strong words and Osho is speaking the truth. Hard facts. North Indian Hindu, by evolution is aggressive in his/her religious beliefs. He/she unleashes, imposing his religion and rituals on other religious people. He/she finds Pork taboo in Islam and thousand other reasons to justify Cow mata imposition (beef ban). I believe the temperament of a North Indian Hindutva bigot is no different from the typical Islamofascists.
 
Last edited:
.
Kerala Christian group wants nuns to hear women’s confession

A Christian group in Kerala has demanded that nuns should be allowed to perform the sacrament of confession for women and minor girls, in the wake of growing sexual crimes involving priests in the state.

They argue that women’s confessions before priests often lead to their exploitation and want the Catholic church to shed what they called its “patriarchal attitude”.

The Kerala Catholic Reformation Movement, which claims to stand for reforms in the church, organised a sit-in protest on Sunday before the archbishop’s house in Kochi to put forward their demand. Members of the movement held placards and banners, saying women are afraid of performing confessions before priests.

Many believers, including women and girls, have welcomed the latest move.

“In Bible, there is no mention that the sacrament of confession should be done only by priests. We want nuns to perform this to check increasing crime involving priests,” Indulekha Joseph, a spokesperson of the movement, said.

She said her organisation is also planning a mass memorandum to Pope Francis, the leader of the Catholic church all over the world, in this regard.

Read more
A confession, also known as penance and reconciliation, is one of the 7 sacraments of the Catholic church, in which followers seek absolution for sins committed by them and are absolved by a priest.

“There are many instances that during confession the priest concerned asking the woman embarrassing questions. Some find an eternal pleasure in this. Since there are many experienced nuns around, the task should be entrusted to them,” Sister Jesme, who discarded her robe in 2010 alleging sexual exploitation, said.

Her autobiography ‘Amen’ had triggered a controversy in the church and the community. Many like her believe that confession often gives the priest an opportunity to embarrass and exploit the woman concerned.


However, Kerala Catholic Bishop Council (KCBC) dismissed the latest demand as a mere publicity stunt.

“You can’t generalise things citing an incident. The agitation is to get media attention and without understanding the core principles of the Bible,” a spokesperson for the council said.

Two weeks ago, the Mananthavady Diocese was forced to tender an apology after a senior priest allegedly raped a minor girl who later gave birth to a baby.

The victim’s father, belonging to an economically backward family, was promised Rs 10 lakh to own up the crime. But the prompt investigation by the police turned the tables on the priest. A maternity hospital and an orphanage controlled by the church are in the dock.

The accused Father Robin Vadakkumcherry, the vicar of St Sebastian church in Kottiyoor, was arrested while he was planning to slip out of the country.

Besides the priest, the police also arrested 5 nuns for covering up the incident.

Embarrassed by the incident, many favour a strict code of conduct for priest and nuns. Reformists blame insiders for the rot and they are planning to send a letter to the Vatican seeking stringent steps to rein in what they call “wayward priests”.

“Once a crime is committed, the first reaction is an attempt to cover it up. This emboldens others also to commit the same crime,” a spokesperson for the Catholic Laymen’s Association said lauding the latest demand.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...-confession/story-f2uTLvDjttzEDORhooKqaN.html

I believe this is right step forward and must be implemented to save kids from pedophiles masquerading as religious heads.
 
. .
Nitish Kumar's 'Principles' The Focus Of Ally Congress' Attack On Him
The damage report on the alliance is centered on Nitish Kumar who decided to scoot over to BJP for the upcoming election for President.
All India | Reported by Manish Kumar, Suparna Singh

190SHARES
1COMMENTS
swabhimaan-rally_650x400_51440936498.jpg


Lalu Yadav's RJD and Congress are coalition partners in Nitish Kumar's Bihar government.

PATNA:
HIGHLIGHTS
  1. Nitish Kumar's allies, Congress and Lalu Yadav, angry with him
  2. He is backing rival BJP's candidate in election for President
  3. Congress questions his principles, Lalu alleges "historic blunder"


Each of the three members of Bihar's ruling alliance is achieving scale in their attacks on each other. Today, it was the Congress that with great gusto took on Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, accusing him of result-driven convictions.


"People who have one principle make one decision, but those who believe in many principles make different decisions," said the Congress' Ghulam Nabi Azad.

The damage report on the alliance - formed just two years ago - is centered on Nitish Kumar who decided to scoot over to rival BJP for the upcoming election for President of India. Last week, the 66-year-old Chief Minister said the BJP's candidate, Ram Nath Kovind, was a fine choice because he had, in his two years as Bihar Governor, done a remarkable job.

Ram Nath Kovind is a Dalit, making it hard for opposition leaders like Mayawati to object to his nomination. Before a group of 17 opposition parties, led by the Congress, could meet to announce their choice, Nitish Kumar said he would back the BJP's choice Mr Kovind. The Congress felt doubly spurned- not just because its ally had abandoned the opposition league that he helped create in April, but because he ignored its request - made by Ghulam Nabi Azad in person in Patna - to wait till after the opposition conclave to announce his decision.

The Congress then steered the opposition towards former Speaker Meira Kumar, also a Dalit, as the nominee of anti-BJP parties. Mayawati and other fence-sitters were won over by the combination of Meira Kumar's caste and qualifications - five-time parliamentarian, former union minister, first woman speaker of the Lok Sabha.


Her candidature was also designed to puncture Nitish Kumar's claim of a Bihar connect as his main grounds for supporting the BJP nominee. Ram Nath Kovind may have served in Bihar, but Meira Kumar, the opposition's choice, belongs to leading political family from Nitish Kumar's state - her father Jagjivan Ram was a freedom fighter and Deputy Prime Minister.


By choosing her rival and not her, Nitish Kumar was making "a historic blunder", charged Lalu Yadav, whose party is the third member, along with Nitish Kumar and the Congress, of the Bihar government. Sources close to him and senior Congress leaders said the Presidential election is just a side project for Nitish Kumar's larger unfolding plan of throwing in his lot with the BJP ahead of the 2019 general election.

Nitish Kumar said that foreboding was unearned and said he remains loyal to his Bihar allies, who he ticked off resoundingly and publicly for thrusting Meira Kumar - "Bihar's Daughter"- into a contest that she has to lose. The BJP, its allies, and a healthy number of regional parties who are backing Ram Nath Kovind have more than 60 per cent of the vote.

"He is the one who is ensuring the defeat of Bihar's daughter, not us," said Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress in Delhi today, demonstrating that the Bihar alliance has unsubscribed from resolving matters privately. Sources said that it was at Lalu Yadav's nudging that the Congress decided to vent against Nitish Kumar.

Yesterday, Lalu Yadv's son, Tejashwi Yadav, who is Nitish Kumar's 27-year-old Deputy, wrote a self-published column expounding on the dangers of "political opportunism." Nitish Kumar's party took offense straight away, warning that the remark "would weaken ties". That resulted in Tejashwi Yadav stating today that it is "BJP-sponsored media" that's trying to break the alliance, which is Himalayan in its strength.

The BJP and Nitish Kumar were partners for 17 years till he opted out ahead of the last general election, objecting vociferously to the party's picking Narendra Modi as its prime ministerial candidate. With his decision on voting with the BJP for President, it is open season for theories about how the BJP and he are approaching full circle.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom