What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

. .
err..wasn't this Muzafar Wani leading the protest against India in Kashmir only a few days ago..& also offered his daughter to fight against 'Indian occupation' ? Hope Sri Sri managed to cleanse his soul of any anti-India feelings!
:D This man has the potential to play the devil's advocate ;).
IMG_6968.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
That is obvious, but such advocacy and track two should be played without cameras. By posing on camera with a know terrorist supporter he is offering legitimacy to their methods and cause. :tdown:

CkvZeLuUoAAtNaE.jpg
Nope, it rather helps. It depends on how one see things. For me its saperatist sitting next to Ravi Shankar, for others its Ravi Shankar sitting next to saperatist. Pro Pakistanis should be worried to see this not me.
 
.
Nope, it rather helps. It depends on how one see things. For me its saperatist sitting next to Ravi Shankar, for others its Ravi Shankar sitting next to saperatist. Pro Pakistanis should be worried to see this not me.

The ONLY thing visible is Ravi Shankar giving Importance and hence Legitimacy to Separatists. Pro pakistanis will be happy to see this.

This is exactly what they want. To put pressure on India using terrorists and separatists and use them as bargaining chips.
 
.
The ONLY thing visible is Ravi Shankar giving Importance and hence Legitimacy to Separatists. Pro pakistanis will be happy to see this.

This is exactly what they want. To put pressure on India using terrorists and separatists and use them as bargaining chips.
Think as a saperatist you will know.
 
. . .
Kewal Singh Dhillon (Congress) owner of dhillon group & Rajinder Gupta (SAD) owner of Trident Group. RG is not fully interested but Sukhbir Badal is forcing him. First Sukhbir Badal was analysing this seat for himself but changed his mind after watching dull response of people during his sangat darshans. He is thinking about maur constituency now because it is a rural area.

Not gonna happen because current government's term is ending in Feb. EC has no power to reduce the term.

I hope you are not talking about MLA Dhillon because this time people & congressi workers are quite angry with him for not standing with them during their bad times. He hardly shows his face after winning. But he has chances of winning because of weak opposition & SAD anti incumbency.

no..not him. he is got bad reputation. Only good thing he did was make barnala district. Heard he is very close to captain so guess he will still get the ticket.
 
.
You mean, to create another religion within a religion. That may be possible in Hinduism(but not without bloodshed) and is not at all possible in Islam. I once talked with my Muslim friend about Islam and he told me that to believe in any other god then Allah is haram for them.
Reform of religious structure along the line of cultural heritage is what we see in the Indian Caste system or in the regional cultural divide in India.(That's why the issues like beef or gaumata does not affects the South Indian Hindus as it does to the North Indian Hindus).

But Joe, what if a large section of people refuses to abide by such rulings, what if they believe that the judiciary doesn't have authority on these matters?
In the last case I quoted the Chief Justice himself said that a court order alone can't establish Ram Rajya in the country, it can't stop corruption.
Shouldn't these matters be left with the administration and the people to decide and introduce the norms acceptable to all the parties.

Don't get offended, but this is the confusion that occurs when we argue in the abstract. The Court recently ruled on the Haji Ali dargah; its ruling was not vague or diffuse, it was specific and pointed. It was to allow women equal rights to visit the tomb. It did not say that the teachings of the conservative ulama who persuaded the trustees to make the restrictions were wrong.

Of course these matters should be left to the administration and to the people to decide and introduce the norms acceptable to all the parties. Now suppose one of the affected parties disagrees with the decisions taken; who rectifies that wrong? In the Haji Ali case, the administration and the male people had decided and introduced the norms acceptable. The women, the female people, found it unfair, and it was they who moved the court.

One of the problems that we face with court judgements is that one part of the written order is the judgement. Unfortunately, judges have been persuaded that their commentary upon the whole matter is a very important thing. Each judge fancies himself or herself as a path-breaking jurist whose judgement will be cited for centuries; in the Common Law system, precedents are vital, and therefore each judgement is important both for subordinate courts and for parallel courts. It is very often in the course of this commentary that judges go very far away from the law. Perhaps one way out of our present state of confusion about what a court should and should not consider would be to put strict restrictions on the amount that a judge can say about the case apart from the verdict itself.
 
. . .
Think as a saperatist you will know.

As an separatist I will be happy to know that GoI has recognised my importance and have sent a Track 2 diplomacy team to engage with me. Evidence of that can now be used for Propaganda and shared with the public and pakistan "establishment" via Photographs conveniently provided.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom