Prometheus
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 4,942
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.
- Thread starter Hyde
- Start date
Bhushan ready with knockout punch, more lethal evidence against Kejriwal 
New Delhi: AAP leader Ashish Khetan is a new player in a game where Prashant Bhushan holds all the aces. Khetan has begun with a flurry of punches but the knockout blow will be Bhushan’s privledge.
Rebel leaders like Ajit Jha and Professor Anand are of the view that Khetan is a pawn in Kejriwal’s hands. “ He is more loyal than the King. The real brain behind Khetan is Kejriwal,” said rebel leader Ajit Jha.
Sources close to Bhushan told India Samvad that whistle blower lawyer’s next punch can blow the lid off corruption in Aam Aadmi Party. “ As founder of AAP, Bhushan has access to secrets which can destroy the very foundation of Kejriwal’s credibility. Core volunteers disenchanted with AAP have provided documentary evidence of corruption relating to party funds,” said Bhushan’s protégé who was once close to the Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
Expelled leaders of AAP have evidence to prove that many entries of donations to party were fudged. Some of the cash transactions have not been shown at all. “ During 2013 assembly elections we regulated the inflow of money and maintained transparency. But in this year’s assembly polls transparency was thrown to wind by Kejriwal’s men like Pankaj Gupta,” said Ajit Jha, former member of National executive of AAP , now expelled from the party. Ajit Jha added, “ If team Kejriwal tries to launch fresh offensive then we would retaliate with more incriminating evidence against them.”
Sources said Prashant Bhushan was annoyed on Kejriwal when he allegedly instigated Ashish Khetan to target Yogendra Yadav and Bhushan. The reason of being annoyed was the fact that Khetan was introduced to Kejriwal by Prashant Bhushan. “ In July 2013 AAP was contemplating to start its own news channel. Prashant then introduced Khetan to Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia. However due to paucity of funds the project could not start. Later during Lok Sabha polls Prashant suggested Khetan’s name as candidate for New Delhi seat in the meeting of Political Affairs Committee,” said a rebel leader. According to him Bhushan felt that he was back stabbed by his protégé when Ashish went public with several tweets against his mentor.
Sources said that rebel camp has a few audio tapes relating to senior AAP leaders who were negotiating deals with prospective ticket seekers. Besides these tapes, NRI volunteers of UK and US have provided evidence of sending funds to a Chennai based NGO from where salaries were allegedly drawn by two AAP leaders. These two AAP leaders are close to Kejriwal.
New Delhi: AAP leader Ashish Khetan is a new player in a game where Prashant Bhushan holds all the aces. Khetan has begun with a flurry of punches but the knockout blow will be Bhushan’s privledge.
Rebel leaders like Ajit Jha and Professor Anand are of the view that Khetan is a pawn in Kejriwal’s hands. “ He is more loyal than the King. The real brain behind Khetan is Kejriwal,” said rebel leader Ajit Jha.
Sources close to Bhushan told India Samvad that whistle blower lawyer’s next punch can blow the lid off corruption in Aam Aadmi Party. “ As founder of AAP, Bhushan has access to secrets which can destroy the very foundation of Kejriwal’s credibility. Core volunteers disenchanted with AAP have provided documentary evidence of corruption relating to party funds,” said Bhushan’s protégé who was once close to the Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
Expelled leaders of AAP have evidence to prove that many entries of donations to party were fudged. Some of the cash transactions have not been shown at all. “ During 2013 assembly elections we regulated the inflow of money and maintained transparency. But in this year’s assembly polls transparency was thrown to wind by Kejriwal’s men like Pankaj Gupta,” said Ajit Jha, former member of National executive of AAP , now expelled from the party. Ajit Jha added, “ If team Kejriwal tries to launch fresh offensive then we would retaliate with more incriminating evidence against them.”
Sources said Prashant Bhushan was annoyed on Kejriwal when he allegedly instigated Ashish Khetan to target Yogendra Yadav and Bhushan. The reason of being annoyed was the fact that Khetan was introduced to Kejriwal by Prashant Bhushan. “ In July 2013 AAP was contemplating to start its own news channel. Prashant then introduced Khetan to Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia. However due to paucity of funds the project could not start. Later during Lok Sabha polls Prashant suggested Khetan’s name as candidate for New Delhi seat in the meeting of Political Affairs Committee,” said a rebel leader. According to him Bhushan felt that he was back stabbed by his protégé when Ashish went public with several tweets against his mentor.
Sources said that rebel camp has a few audio tapes relating to senior AAP leaders who were negotiating deals with prospective ticket seekers. Besides these tapes, NRI volunteers of UK and US have provided evidence of sending funds to a Chennai based NGO from where salaries were allegedly drawn by two AAP leaders. These two AAP leaders are close to Kejriwal.
Lucid Thoughts
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2015
- Messages
- 230
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
better than your madras.
IndoCarib
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 10,784
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
cloud_9
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Who the f**k are you and stop being a c*nt!
Lucid Thoughts
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2015
- Messages
- 230
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
You hindoos aren't welcome in Punjab. Go home.
cloud_9
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Last edited:
You got your head stuck.where sun never shines.Pull it out,mate!
Its the white power Arya Desa kid, needless to say he is fucked in the head.
cloud_9
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
He was a Dogra and according to Dogra History 101, most of them were Hindus before Ranjist Singhs era.So why so much hate for Hindus ?
I don't buy that story either, he is most likely a false flagger(u know who), trying to create rift between Hindus and Sikhs on a random anonymous forum, as one does
. Since his arya desa id got banned permanently, he keeps coming back with the new ones.The one before this was 'East West India best" or some shyte like that.
cloud_9
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
So some people think that Sikhs and Hindus will just go ape shit on each other in real world because few Sikhs and Hindus got into an online bitch fight.I don't buy that story either, he is most likely a false flagger(u know who), trying to create rift between Hindus and Sikhs on a random anonymous forum, as one does
The one before this was 'East West India best" or some shyte like that.
SRP
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 2,460
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Rahul Gandhi's 'Are you serious?' moment
It takes exceptional gall for a leader of the Congress to call the Modi government a "suit-boot sarkar". The party that for 10 years ran the most corrupt government in India's history, that was in bed with every crony capitalist you could find and that got its just deserts at the hands of disgusted voters would like the country to forget contemporary history and look at the Modi government instead as a party for businessmen. Rahul Gandhi also forgets that the biggest land grab in India's history was operated by "suited-booted" people during his government's rule, under the garb of the scandal-ridden sham of creating special economic zones. And who was it who funded the Congress all these years if it was not "suited-booted" people?
Mr Gandhi also seems to forget Congress history. It was Indira Gandhi who amended the law to declare that farmers whose land was taken forcibly by the government could not get "compensation" from the government but only an "amount"- because all landowners were exploitative kulaks and, therefore, did not deserve proper compensation. Now those kulaks have become the builders of India for whom Mr Gandhi's heart bleeds. Going further back in history, it was Jawaharlal Nehru who put land acquisition beyond the pale of judicial review. Indeed Nehru told those who were being displaced to make way for the Hirakud dam that"if you are to suffer, you should suffer in the interest of the country". So when Mr Gandhi stands up to relaunch his political career with bleeding-heart posturing, it is time to ask the question that Robert Vadra posed to a reporter: "Are you serious?"
There are other questions that Mr Gandhi must answer. For while it is true that his party's government raised food procurement prices substantially, did it not also cause the rampant food inflation that his government failed to control, and, therefore, to lose its mandate? Indeed while he can rightly claim credit for the faster growth of agriculture during the Manmohan Singh years, he should be reminded that among the states that have recorded the fastest growth in agricultural output over the past decade are Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh - both ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
The great disservice that Mr Gandhi has done is by casting the debate on forcible land acquisition in terms that suggest that the country does not need businessmen, that it does not need manufacturing, that it does not need physical infrastructure. Indeed he fails to understand that the reason why farming is uneconomical is because average land holdings have shrunk over the decades. That, in turn, is because this country has not created enough non-agricultural jobs, to take pressure off the land. Half the workforce slaves in the fields to generate one-seventh of gross domestic product (GDP); naturally, incomes from farming will be low and often not enough to keep body and soul together. You could address that by raising agricultural product prices, as Mr Gandhi seems to prefer, but that only helps farmers with a marketable surplus, which is a small minority. It also raises the cost of food for the poor, including agricultural labourers who do not own land. Pricing decisions have benefits and costs, and one should keep an eye on both.
There is no shortage of people who think that Mr Gandhi needs some basic lessons in politics. On the evidence provided by his third (or fourth or fifth …) major intervention in Parliament in 11 years, he also needs some lessons in elementary economics and in Congress history.
Rahul Gandhi's 'Are you serious?' moment | Business Standard Editorials
It takes exceptional gall for a leader of the Congress to call the Modi government a "suit-boot sarkar". The party that for 10 years ran the most corrupt government in India's history, that was in bed with every crony capitalist you could find and that got its just deserts at the hands of disgusted voters would like the country to forget contemporary history and look at the Modi government instead as a party for businessmen. Rahul Gandhi also forgets that the biggest land grab in India's history was operated by "suited-booted" people during his government's rule, under the garb of the scandal-ridden sham of creating special economic zones. And who was it who funded the Congress all these years if it was not "suited-booted" people?
Mr Gandhi also seems to forget Congress history. It was Indira Gandhi who amended the law to declare that farmers whose land was taken forcibly by the government could not get "compensation" from the government but only an "amount"- because all landowners were exploitative kulaks and, therefore, did not deserve proper compensation. Now those kulaks have become the builders of India for whom Mr Gandhi's heart bleeds. Going further back in history, it was Jawaharlal Nehru who put land acquisition beyond the pale of judicial review. Indeed Nehru told those who were being displaced to make way for the Hirakud dam that"if you are to suffer, you should suffer in the interest of the country". So when Mr Gandhi stands up to relaunch his political career with bleeding-heart posturing, it is time to ask the question that Robert Vadra posed to a reporter: "Are you serious?"
There are other questions that Mr Gandhi must answer. For while it is true that his party's government raised food procurement prices substantially, did it not also cause the rampant food inflation that his government failed to control, and, therefore, to lose its mandate? Indeed while he can rightly claim credit for the faster growth of agriculture during the Manmohan Singh years, he should be reminded that among the states that have recorded the fastest growth in agricultural output over the past decade are Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh - both ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
The great disservice that Mr Gandhi has done is by casting the debate on forcible land acquisition in terms that suggest that the country does not need businessmen, that it does not need manufacturing, that it does not need physical infrastructure. Indeed he fails to understand that the reason why farming is uneconomical is because average land holdings have shrunk over the decades. That, in turn, is because this country has not created enough non-agricultural jobs, to take pressure off the land. Half the workforce slaves in the fields to generate one-seventh of gross domestic product (GDP); naturally, incomes from farming will be low and often not enough to keep body and soul together. You could address that by raising agricultural product prices, as Mr Gandhi seems to prefer, but that only helps farmers with a marketable surplus, which is a small minority. It also raises the cost of food for the poor, including agricultural labourers who do not own land. Pricing decisions have benefits and costs, and one should keep an eye on both.
There is no shortage of people who think that Mr Gandhi needs some basic lessons in politics. On the evidence provided by his third (or fourth or fifth …) major intervention in Parliament in 11 years, he also needs some lessons in elementary economics and in Congress history.
Rahul Gandhi's 'Are you serious?' moment | Business Standard Editorials
jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
can i expect your presence in this thread ( farmer commit suicide in AAP ralley live on TV ), please??
all sangh supporters too.
Similar threads
