What's new

Indian police wrongly target Muslims

indian police wrongly targets everyone. They even wrongly targetted me & i'm not a muslim. My paper license said i'm authorised to drive motor vehicle, din't say motor car & that's why i was fined!! funny isn't it? bloody indian police! lol..
 
The now well tamed indian muslim brigade- where are they?-


Well what??????????? mind ur language. :angry:

We are not a nation of suicide bombers or dictator rule.

And a statement of a single person is not God's word what will you say if the same person have said that the Indian Muslim are treated as VIP over other religions??????????

Obviously you would have not happy or jumping up and down.
:sick:
 
. If Swami Aseemanand hadn't made his confession, all the bombings would have been put on the Indian Muslims.

The topic is about Indian police wrongly targeting Muslims. if police is doing that why did they catch Swami Assimanand and after catching they made him confess about the plot....

Tell me either Swami Asimanand wrong made a wrong confession or Police caught a wrong person..doesnt fit in the story and topic we are discussing right?
 
I don't understand why the title says :: Indian police wrongly target Muslims
I understand Indian Police many time wrong target many innocent, Why is it been given a religious color?
Recently one of the women was arrest by same Indian police for considering her to be a Maoist(released later as per court order), She was not Muslim, for you information she was a Hindu.
 
If Swami Aseemanand hadn't made his confession, all the bombings would have been put on the Indian Muslims.
Lets cut your crap here, Our police did not make a muslim to confess to the bombings that were carried out by fanatic hindu groups, Our police made sure that the real culprit is behind the bars.
For your information the other religious fanatics contribution to terrorism will not even come to a fraction of the contribution made by Islamic fanatic groups.
So hence when a bomb explodes some where the general perception is that fanatic Muslims might be involved.

If the same incident that you are refering to had happened in your country your police would have closed the file accusing the RAW even with out a courtesy investigation.
 
Honestly, the cops always look for an easier option and arresting your local 'Muslim' chaps with a dubious past is the easier way out. Stereotyping and generalizations are at work here normally. For example, a couple of years ago when bomb blasts shook Delhi's Sarojini nagar area, a DTC bus driver drove off after finding me as the lone guy with a bag at the bus stop. All becausethere was a suspected role of Khalistani separatists.
 
@Bilal - The Aseemanand confession and the subsequent arrests have definitely changed a lot of perceptions with in the general Indian public and the security establishment. I for one, never thought a Hindu, however right-winger he might be could actually plan attacks and plant bombs. And that was mainly because there was no precedent. Yes, there were riots but terrorist attacks like the ones usually seen from other separatist groups were unheard of. The likes of Pragya Thakur and Col Purohit have done tremendous damage to the beyond-suspicion perception of the Hindu society in India.
 
lol..pakistani here just trying to justify their decision on 1947..you dont see these kind of BS coming from us about pakistan when we already know how much worse condition of muslims/hindu/christian is in pakistan///keep imagining things and be happy...

Long live India...:smitten:
 
@Bilal - The Aseemanand confession and the subsequent arrests have definitely changed a lot of perceptions with in the general Indian public and the security establishment. I for one, never thought a Hindu, however right-winger he might be could actually plan attacks and plant bombs. And that was mainly because there was no precedent. Yes, there were riots but terrorist attacks like the ones usually seen from other separatist groups were unheard of. The likes of Pragya Thakur and Col Purohit have done tremendous damage to the beyond-suspicion perception of the Hindu society in India.

I for one wasn't surprised, it was bound to happen.

Two things -
First, this violent and chauvinistic branch of Hinduism isn't anything recent, but has been around for a long time.
Secondly, it was only a matter of time before some loon take law in his hand to avenge what they see Govt appeasement towards minority groups and turning a blind eye towards Islamic terrorism.

I don't understand the statements like Hindus can't be terrorist, probably people try to mean that Hindus can't justify terrorism using their religion as the concept of infidel and holy war are alien to Hinduism, once again the answer lies in the particular branch of Hinduism which shaped in early 19th century and tried to organize Hindus just as Semitic religions do to their followers.
 
I for one wasn't surprised, it was bound to happen.

Two things -
First, this violent and chauvinistic branch of Hinduism isn't anything recent, but has been around for a long time.
Secondly, it was only a matter of time before some loon take law in his hand to avenge what they see Govt appeasement towards minority groups.

I don't understand the statements like Hindus can't be terrorist, probably people try to mean that Hindus can't justify terrorism using their religion as the concept of infidel and holy are alien to Hinduism, once again the answer lies in the particular branch of Hinduism which shaped in early 19th century and tried to organize Hindus just as Semitic religions do to their followers.

Agreed with both the probable causes. Let me add a third one there - economic prosperity. The 90s brought with it relative economic prosperity and thus the lower-middle class urban Hindu, now confidently saw it as his right to rectify recent wrongs brought about in the name of secularism. The rise of right-wing parties in the last two decades is further testament to that.

Militant Hinduism is a still a strange phenomenon to observe.
 
Agreed with both the probable causes. Let me add a third one there - economic prosperity. The 90s brought with it relative economic prosperity and thus the lower-middle class urban Hindu, now confidently saw it as his right to rectify recent wrongs brought about in the name of secularism. The rise of right-wing parties in the last two decades is further testament to that.

Militant Hinduism is a still a strange phenomenon to observe.

Ayodhay movement ,the biggest Hindu right wing started one year before MMS become finance minister and user in liberisation.

Even if we go by the supposed confession of Swami Aseemananda ,he talks up the bombs as revenge act against the series of blast by jihadi grups in early 2000s in north india and mumbai, especially when Hunuman temple of kashi was targeted.

Govt appeasement towards minority groups which part of long history of congress rule isn't reason .

The reason is retaliation and that's why some mosques choosed as targets .

Hindutva groups don't it as part of religion like the jiadi ones do .

while jihadi group claim responsibility of the blast execute as if they are proud of it and wants show it everyone what they are doing.

Hindus group remained silent though sent enough indication to the Muslims by targeting their mosque that who could be behind the blasts.
 
.
Mangalore/ Hydrabad / Samjhautha all Muslim were arrested, even they had no hand all done by Hindu Orthadox.

Small correction - Its still not proved.

And as far as arresting 'innocent' Muslims is concerned - they only have their bros in IM, SIMI, LeT, HuJI,JeM etc etc to blame for their plight.

every nation in the world arrests only suspects in the first swoop and there is every possiblity their initial suspicion was not correct. Get over it.


Huh and btw Aseem dude had already retracted his 'alleged' confession and said it was forced out of him.

The US and even many apolitical Indian sources still blame Arif Qasmani of LeT for the Samjotha attacks.
 
Ayodhay movement ,the biggest Hindu right wing started one year before MMS become finance minister and user in liberisation.

Agreed, Ayodhya movement started pretty early but you would certainly agree that the post 90's period has certainly emboldened these movements rather than impede it. And this when BJP was on the ascendancy in national politics.

Even if we go by the supposed confession of Swami Aseemananda ,he talks up the bombs as revenge act against the series of blast by jihadi grups in early 2000s in north india and mumbai, especially when Hunuman temple of kashi was targeted.

Govt appeasement towards minority groups which part of long history of congress rule isn't reason .

The reason is retaliation and that's why some mosques choosed as targets .

Hindutva groups don't it as part of religion like the jiadi ones do .

while jihadi group claim responsibility of the blast execute as if they are proud of it and wants show it everyone what they are doing.

Hindus group remained silent though sent enough indication to the Muslims by targeting their mosque that who could be behind the blasts.

I dont understand. The act was done. Owning up to it or not didnt even matter in the end. If you're trying to point the difference between Islamic groups and Hindu groups by saying that the latter do not use their religion as justification for the attacks, then as I said, it doesnt matter. They are still able to translate religious fervor into violence.

The point I was trying to make was that regardless of the provocation, if you use the same methods for retribution as the provocateurs then there's really no difference between the two parties.
 
Its ridiculous how some people try to show bureaucratic inefficiency as an example of bias and racism.

Muslims appear to be targeted simply because of all minorities in our country the socio-economic conditions of Muslims are the worst.They lag significantly in comparison to other groups in terms of wealth , political connections , positions etc. and this is a situation which is being steadily remedied.

Corrupt and politically oriented as the Indian Police are , they can only act against the innocent , vulnerable sections of society ...certainly not the people with Political connections, power , influence.

Hence much easier to find a scapegoat among a bunch of poor Schedule castes , migrant labourers , uneducated folk which incidentally includes many Muslims.

Also the current Global perception on Muslims and terrorism across the Globe carried out by extremists claiming to be pious Muslims
does not help. And society inevitably tends to view Muslims with suspicion which is not an "Indian exclusive phenomenon".

Even all this Aseemanand Drama and this coinage of the word "Hindu Terrorism" reflects cheap vote bank politics being played by Congress and the so called secular polity ( RJD , Samajwadi , BSP etc) simply to hold a couple of cards against the Saffron Bunch and a pathetic attempt to demonize their Hindutva agenda by cashing in on the Global antipathy to terror .

Motivations for bringing the topic of Hindu terror to existence was never to right the wrongs of "poor Muslims " languishing in Indian Jails ...but purely to score a political point.

No matter how many politicians attempt to depict ideals of Hindutva , Hindu culture , pride in Hinduism --- as evidence of malevolent designs of "Hindu terrorists " , the truth is such an aberration does not exist .

Even a Hindu Majority terrorist organization like LTTE never made their fight as a Hindu vs Muslim phenomenon over 2 decades of its existence. That by itself should be ample proof that "Hindu terror" never existed and never will.
 
So what? There are thousands of mis-intended targets REGARDLESS of communities in the country. Do all faiths shout that on basis of faith this is done?

Cut the crap.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom