But Sir, before Swami Aseemanand's confession,
most Indians thought it was not possible to have a Hindu terrorist; that a terrorist cannot be Hindu, & vice versa (&
most people still think along those lines).
Most Indians still think terrorism is only synonymous with Muslims, & it is impossible for a Hindu to indulge in such activities. Even in attacks against Muslims; such as Mecca Masjid (Hyderabad), Malegaon blast, Samjhota Express bombing; it was the Muslims that got arrested (when Hindutva terrorists were responsible).
Aseemanand's confession: Focus shifts to jailed Muslim youths : North: News India Today
This is not a result of bad administration, but serious flaws in society, & the understanding of social dynamics. Christian extremism & terrorism is accepted in the US: Christian extremists blow up abortion clinics, then there are people like Tim Mc Veigh & Eric Rudolph that are considered Christian radicals. But the fact that
most people in India cannot accept that a Hindu can be involved in terrorism, that there can be no such thing as a Hindu radical, raises huge questions about the Indian society & its democracy. I hope you understand sir. Regards.