Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thats a show of courtacy, this bloke has his hand out and the indian put his hands together, question is why?Who knows who cares. Its making a mountain of a mole hill.
Why? do the Brits always say namaste when they come to India? Or do they do aadab when they go to Pakistan? And if they don't its not taken as an offence. Its a matter of preference.
thats a show of courtacy, this bloke has his hand out and the indian put his hands together, question is why?
whould it have hurt him to shake his hand?
thats a show of courtacy, this bloke has his hand out and the indian put his hands together, question is why?
whould it have hurt him to shake his hand?
Courtesy doesn't have a nationality, a british or even a european ownership. That is the indian way of greeting and is his personal choice. If the premise of the argument is my way or the highway then it can be his way and his way only.thats a show of courtacy, this bloke has his hand out and the indian put his hands together, question is why?
whould it have hurt him to shake his hand?
well i assume putting your hands together (namaste) in india is more common than shaking hands as compared to pakistan.Not really. I too do the same a lot of times. Its not an offensive gesture.If I say, that when a person does not return the namaste it is offensive it is being ridiculous. In Bombay, friend's dad says aadab when I tell him Namaste uncle. How is it offensive?
Like I said, a slow news day.
fair enough i guess.Courtesy doesn't have a nationality, a british or even a european ownership. That is the indian way of greeting and is his personal choice. If the premise of the argument is my way or the highway then it can be his way and his way only.
Well he has shaken the hand with other officials of the Pak delegations but when it comes to the Dr Faisal he refused to shake hand with him.
Sorry the british educated council should have talked like Appu from bihar.Whats wrong with Namaste, first the fake accent, now fake etiquette !
Not everyone is like the indians defence minister:I heard he saw Dr. Faisal pick his nose before...hence the reneg on the handshake! LOL
Jokes aside, it shouldn't be such a big deal as it's made out to be..at least not worth the bandwidth and certainly not worth an article!
Sorry the british educated council should have talked like Appu from bihar.
And the DG should have respected the indian arseholes culture (which he forgot the first time at ICJ - not gangu telis house in dharavi)and not forwarded his hand for a courteous handshake.
Not everyone is like the indians defence minister:
View attachment 397534
lol. way too rich , this comes from a country which wants to hang a man without giving access or conducting a fair trial.Indian official refuses to be civil at the ICJ
Global Village Space |
Deepak Mittal, an official of India’s Ministry of External Affairs, refused to shake the outstretched hand of Mohammad Faisal, Pakistan’s DG for South Asia and SAARC.
Amid rising tensions, delegations from India and Pakistan came face to face at the International Court of Justice on Monday. This display of passive-aggressive hostility highlighted the tense atmosphere which pervaded the proceedings.
Mr. Mittal had previously shaken hands with Pakistan’s Attorney General but then refused to shake Mr. Faisal’s offering a namaskar instead.
Read More: If Pakistan goes to the ICJ mala fide interests are at…
This goes to show the depth of animosity which has penetrated the relations between Pakistan and India. Even at an international forum, representatives are not civil.
Read full article:
Indian official refuses to be civil at the ICJ
A namaskar is an Indian way of greeting, equivalent to a handshake. Sensationalisation of non event. I guess its a boring day in the newsroom.
lol. way too rich , this comes from a country which wants to hang a man without giving access or conducting a fair trial.