What's new

Indian Navy Outgunned As China Launches Its Biggest Destroyer

@all Chinese members.

This is disgusting and shows the petty side of you. Money does not bring class.

You post a world class Chinese DDG in Indian forum and say Indians better not troll. of course they going to troll.

Until P16 comes online, T-055 is kick ***.

But going as far as saying outgunned in IOR is wishful thinking. There is a pecking order and still Chinese is third in IOR.
 
.
@all Chinese members.

This is disgusting and shows the petty side of you. Money does not bring class.

You post a world class Chinese DDG in Indian forum and say Indians better not troll. of course they going to troll.

Until P16 comes online, T-055 is kick ***.

But going as far as saying outgunned in IOR is wishful thinking. There is a pecking order and still Chinese is third in IOR.
Dude, i think the most important thing for india is to make a 100% indigenous battleship and stop boasting.
You could never buy a strong navy on par with PLAN.
 
.
Dude, i think the most important thing for india is to make a 100% indigenous battleship and stop boasting.
You could never buy a strong navy on par with PLAN.

I don't think anyone disagrees with you.
 
.
You bringing in radar and avionics....not me pal.

Tell me what you believe to be the state of radar and avionics in "mass-market" "commercial" UAVs of this size...introduced "temporarily"? Small Field unit UAVs are glorified christmas toys....they carry nothing significant regarding radar or avionics...and their life cycle is extremely low as well (hence mass - market moniker). It has volume and payload for an advanced radar+transmitter?...It has some inherent stability issue or performance req that it needs advanced avionics with say high level FEMU/FMS?

In any case Radar and avionics can never be the field of a troll that has a 5/22 rating ratio. Go troll in your own subforum, you will get some applause over there so you can feel vindicated. Bring in one of your better members here that knows something about radars and avionics if you care about defending your position that much. You only embarrass your own country.
Now imagine this, IDF could have chosen any of the gazillion 'mass market' drone, why DJI? The fact that an Israeli force chose a Chinese product shows some merit with their technology.

And now they are using it for military applications. So why can't India produce even such simple 'mass market' drone?
 
.
Now imagine this, IDF could have chosen any of the gazillion 'mass market' drone, why DJI? The fact that an Israeli force chose a Chinese product shows some merit with their technology.

And now they are using it for military applications. So why can't India produce even such simple 'mass market' drone?
They even got the cheek to laugh at it. It just show how ignorant they are. Can't even produced something IDF will buy it. If it's so simple, IDF will Not even buy it for its military application in the first place.

I don't think anyone disagrees with you.
Billions of delusion Indian agree with that view they are superpower despite buying bulk of their equipment overseas as glory. That is nothing more important than national security.
 
.
Billions of delusion Indian agree with that view they are superpower despite buying bulk of their equipment overseas as glory. That is nothing more important than national security.

Indians are a emotional lot.

But looking at this thread, its the chinese who are the petty ones. Sorry,Calling spade a spade.
 
. . . .
We are not petty. We are telling the truth. It's the Indian who cannot accept reality and keep being in delusion or finding excuse to keep away from reality.

Ok bro. Chinese members are posting stuff about Chinese weapons in Indian sub forums and trolling on Indians.

But yea. Indians are delusional. Lets go with that.
 
.
Pretty sure it will go through it. You know physics and all..
As if no electronic counter measure and CWIS to stop it? You are trying to hit a full combat ready 055 cruiser , not a cargo container.

Ok bro. Chinese members are posting stuff about Chinese weapons in Indian sub forums and trolling on Indians.

But yea. Indians are delusional. Lets go with that.
See the response of your compatriot and amount of trash article by India media always trying to compare military hardware whatever China has. I am
Only presenting the truth. If you want to be delusion. Go ahead.
 
.
As if no electronic counter measure and CWIS to stop it? You are trying to hit a full combat ready 055 cruiser , not a cargo container.


See the response of your compatriot and amount of trash article by India media always trying to compare military hardware whatever China has. I am
Only presenting the truth. If you want to be delusion. Go ahead.

Again, Indian subforum buddy.
 
.
Are you insulting IDF? They are your darling. IDF playing with Xmas toy? How unprofessional are they. :lol:

PLA don't play with such thing. We got military grade drone and we don't need to import anything unlike your darling IDF and India armed forces :rofl:

I will show your remark to Israeli friend and they will be angry at your Indian and stop selling you barak 8 or whatever. Becareful of what you post :lol:

No I am insulting you for claiming quite stupidly that small "mass market" UAVs are a measure of avionics and radar capability. You still don't get that fundamentally do you? Seriously such a laughable CPC troll.

Now imagine this, IDF could have chosen any of the gazillion 'mass market' drone, why DJI? The fact that an Israeli force chose a Chinese product shows some merit with their technology.

And now they are using it for military applications. So why can't India produce even such simple 'mass market' drone?

Has nothing to do with my original counter-argument (this class of UAV has nothing to do with realised top level radar and avionics performance stated by your fellow troll).

Trinket mass production economics (regarding absolute and competitive advantages etc) can be left to another thread.
 
.
No I am insulting you for claiming quite stupidly that small "mass market" UAVs are a measure of avionics and radar capability. You still don't get that fundamentally do you? Seriously such a laughable CPC troll.



Has nothing to do with my original counter-argument (this class of UAV has nothing to do with realised top level radar and avionics performance stated by your fellow troll).

Trinket mass production economics (regarding absolute and competitive advantages etc) can be left to another thread.
I guess if selling trinkets can give us a 50bil$ trade surplus vs India, it is a good deal. Wait, I just remembered, you don't even have a semicon fab, YOU CAN'T MAKE TRINKET DRONES. LOL

You have no idea about the patented image stabilization technology, the gyroscope technology nor the advanced control techonology used in DJI drone. If its so simple, why can't India produce such simple drones? Why the Isreali army is not making one themselves?
 
.
别把国内论坛的争吵带过来,跑到人家论坛显摆不合适吧,时刻注意自己的教养。我们有进步,人家也没闲着,五十步笑百步不可取,嘚瑟个屁啊,自己有了个好东西就要跑别人家显摆?需要显摆给阿三?有必要和阿三比?有点出息没?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom