ayesha.a
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,336
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
No one cares what a clown like you has to say. Come back with some facts to back up your nonsense or show yourself out.
I suggest anyone who hasn't seen this video to watch it in full to see what a "failure" 26/11 was:
No civilian police force on earth could have done much about the attacks on 26/11. The Charlie Hebdo attackers were neutralized only after 9 hours, despite attacking just one point. The recent attacks in Paris claimed some 130+ lives, despite being much less sophisticated than 26/11.
India's state police forces are ill-trained and ill-equipped and lowly paid. But they still managed to kill or pin down the terrorists, so that specialized CT forces could mop them up.
Yes it took 3 days, but what is more important? Saving lives, or ending it quickly? We could have dropped a few bombs or rocketed the hotels like Pakistan levels entire villages in their CI operations, and ended it in a few seconds. Instead, our forces chose to go in and clear the hotels floor by floor and room by room, minimizing collateral damage.
I don't care if it took 30 days, if it saved more lives. Dropping bombs from jets and killing all and sundry (more civilians than terrorists) may be adrenaline boosting for some; but civilized nations choose a different approach.