What's new

Indian Mujahideen chief Yaseen Bhatkal arrested

Very respectfully then, he is a terrorist. And will meet a terrorist's end.

There's no need to be an *** dude. If the same restrictions were removed there'd be no end to the name-calling against Indians as well.
 
.
Seems like the Nepal border is a hot bed for Indian militants.

He seems too young to be the head of anything. Especially considering hes been one since 2008.

Because Indo-Nepal border is a open border and Visa or Passports are not required to go to Nepal or to come from there, just an indentity card. Nepalese can come to India and work anywhere in our private organisations without visa, passport thing.
 
.
You seems to be more competent than NIA personnel.:lol:

You seem to lack a basic comprehension of the English language.

Because Indo-Nepal border is a open border and Visa or Passports are not required to go to Nepal or to come from there, just an indentity card. Nepalese can come to India and work anywhere in our private organisations without visa, passport thing.

Or its a convenient ruse, after pulling out a few blokes from your behind!
 
.
There's no need to be an *** dude. If the same restrictions were removed there'd be no end to the name-calling against Indians as well.

So basis our recent private discussion on the same, are you as the admin now expanding the respectful discourse, "militant" clause to home grown terrorists as well in addition to the Kashmiri "freedom fighters" ?

What next? Should we refer to them as holy martyrs?
 
.
You seem to lack a basic comprehension of the English language.



Or its a convenient ruse, after pulling out a few blokes from your behind!

naah. Reports saying that nepali agencies helped Indians to nab him.
 
. .
You seem to lack a basic comprehension of the English language.



Or its a convenient ruse, after pulling out a few blokes from your behind!

naah. Reports says that nepali agencies helped Indians to nab him.
 
. .
He is 30 years old. Given that no one heard of "Indian Mujaheddin" before 2008, its not far fetched at all.

Actually 30 is not young as they are trained to commit crime since juvenile ages, Mumbai is very recent example of that .
 
.
So basis our recent private discussion on the same, are you as the admin now expanding the respectful discourse, "militant" clause to home grown terrorists as well in addition to the Kashmiri "freedom fighters" ?

What next? Should we refer to them as holy martyrs?

No its limited to discourse related to Kashmiri separatists alone. However your comments indicate you still don't understand the basis of such a neutral policy for civil discourse.

Of course that is only true until you see your own countrymen its army getting abused in a similar manner at that time our reported posts alerts start going off, but when you lot do the same, its thand mahol.

What I don't understand is what is the need for namecalling on PDF? If you have nothing better to contribute to a discussion other than calling the person a terrorist, then perhaps you shouldn't be contributing at all.
 
.
No its limited to discourse related to Kashmiri separatists alone. However your comments indicate you still don't understand the basis of such a neutral policy for civil discourse.

Of course that is only true until you see your own countrymen its army getting abused in a similar manner at that time our reported posts alerts start going off, but when you lot do the same, its thand mahol.

What I don't understand is what is the need for namecalling on PDF? If you have nothing better to contribute to a discussion other than calling the person a terrorist, then perhaps you shouldn't be contributing at all.

Calling terrorists like Bhatkal a terrorist isn't really name calling :undecided:

He planted bombs in busy public places and killed dozens of innocent civilians, he is a terrorist.
 
.
No its limited to discourse related to Kashmiri separatists alone. However your comments indicate you still don't understand the basis of such a neutral policy for civil discourse.

Of course that is only true until you see your own countrymen its army getting abused in a similar manner at that time our reported posts alerts start going off, but when you lot do the same, its thand mahol.

What I don't understand is what is the need for namecalling on PDF? If you have nothing better to contribute to a discussion other than calling the person a terrorist, then perhaps you shouldn't be contributing at all.

I thanked you because as always you have taken the effort to put your views across, and that is always appreciated rather than an autocratic authoritarian approach to moderation.

But PLEASE man, Yasin Bhatkal IS A TERRORIST.

What would you have us call him if not a terrorist?

He and his gang are cowards. They plant bombs and kill and maim innocents. Then they run and hide. And plot the next bombing. And the next.

Do they lift guns and fight it out like men? NO.

They are not militants.

Do they want a different land? NO.

They are not separatists.

They are very happy sponging off India, where they breed, and will finally die.

So tell me what we should call them. In order to foster respectful discourse, so that Pakistanis do not take offense and call us names (kutte, suar, etc.).

Just yesterday @Umair Nawaz called Arun Shourie (a respected BJP leader and intellectual) a k.utta. What was Arun Shourie's crime?

So if you think this name calling will stop because our side reins in and calls terrorists as holy martyrs or some such, it is a futile hope on your part.

Thanks for listening. As always.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Guys not just Yasin Bhatlak, but 3 others have been arrested along with him. Thanks to NIA and Nepali agencies who helped us.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom