Indian Media claims 100 Chinese Soldiers were Killed in Galwan

[Whirling_dervesh]

Chinese not 'Pull-back' but 'Push-back', 10 exclusive insider revelations

Chinese announced that they will pull back some of their troops in 4 particular points along with LAC which is been witnessing some amount of tension between India & China. 10 exclusive insider revelations: Not ‘pull back’ but ‘push back’.

REVELATION 1: China hasn’t pulled back, is has been pushed back by a united nation led by a leader who showed resolve.
REVELATION 2: Centre wanted to convey to Chinese that they were dealing with a New India of PM Modi. REVELATION 3: China had come to expect that India would be ‘soft’ going by past precedent. However, within days they realised they were wrong.
REVELATION 5: Economic ‘infallibility’ of China received a hit back with PM’s Aatmanirbhar Bharat doctrine. REVELATION 6: Top Chinese companies staring at a $50 billion loss began pleading with their govt to find a solution.
REVELATION 7: In PM Modi’s world view, Chinese companies will ‘no longer get the share of the pie’ in India. REVELATION 8: PM Modi’s Ladakh showed that India’s troops will not hesitate to deliver a severe blow to ‘expansionists’.
REVELATION 9: Be it maps or apps, India will push back everywhere against those who try to take advantage of its openness.
REVELATION 10: New India has shown it can inflict damage to the enemy where it hurts the most. Watch!

https://www.timesnownews.com/videos...h-back-10-exclusive-insider-revelations/66415

 

[The Maverick]

1 reason? There are actually 1.2 billion reasons you can't trust Wikipedia...and rising.


Are you for real? Seriously?

Your China going home " with their tails between their legs"

Sorry its true. #



You wanted them to steal ladakh and kashmir for you.

SORRY its not happening

 

[Genghis khan1]

Yes yes its a fact, over 100 lost due to Indian super powa prowess, Chinese have retreated after surgical attack. Chinese are lying about casualties as stated by bona fide chinese take away owner from california.

India win again....Jai Modi jee ki...56 inch zindabad

Jai kali mata ki, jai bajrang Bali ki, hanuman invisibly Army struck again...

 

[Whirling_dervesh]

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...wan-valley-say-sources/videoshow/76809226.cms

 

[American Pakistani]

This figure is not authentic: https://eurasiantimes.com/fact-chec...in-india-china-border-clash-at-galwan-valley/

PLA casualties in the clash remain undisclosed to this day. One source suggest count of 35 but it include injured (perhaps all were injured?). No reliable information about how many KIA on Chinese side, if any.

But this is not a matter of celebration. Point is what was the objective and was it achieved?

Chinese don't take casualties so lightly. Had they were on recieving end with 35 soldiers dead, they would've minced bhartis to drain meaning they would've attacked with full force.

To me 35 maybe the minor or moderatly injured personals including construction workers.

 

[313ghazi]

We're they killed by the apps being uninstalled?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

So we just letting Indians throw out racial slurs like nothing then. Cool what a garbage forum

 

[52051]

100 PLA died and still not a single picture of PLA dead bodies to show? whilst video and picture all over the internet shown by Indians when Indians beat a single Chinese communication officer there for neogation before?

I guess its not very hard to make Indians happy with their 78 IQ brains.

Btw, the author is at the FLG media, the same media claimed crazy town stories like 21 million Chinese dead due to COVID-19 and such.

So we just letting Indians throw out racial slurs like nothing then. Cool what a garbage forum

Who cares a bunch of IQ-78 says, if a monkey smear you do you smear back

Your BIG DADDY going home " with their tails between their legs"

Sorry its true. #

and we told you the chinks " will do nothing "

You wanted them to steal ladakh and kashmir for you.

SORRY its not happening

Don't keep your hope high, the last time you claimed China retreat, and they killed 20+ of you, and wipe your entire regiment-level command chain out.

 

[Safriz]

When Abhinandan can shoot down a PAF F-16 without firing any missile z then why can't Indian soldiers kill 1000( add as many zeros as you want) just by using bare Knuckle?

 

[j20611]

THE DEATH of 100 soldiers is being reported/admitted by chinease media

Pakistanis need to get our jealousy and envy to one side

China took a battering that NIGHT

this is why they have denied all knowledge

REMEMBER KARGIL you lost hundeds of soldiers and MUSHRAFF and co denied it UNTIL years later

maybe according to the Indian internet you claimed to have invented 10000 years ago. But the reality is that 20 of dot heads died and 60 surrendered easily
Go back to raping cows
https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/ma...ims-it-is-the-reincarnation-of-his-dead-wife/

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

show us the videos/bodies. it is customary to return the bodies if you have them. and if they don't have them, how can they confirm the number?

 

[jian-10]

Retired and hurt PLA veterans could become a force against the Chinese Communist Party regime

When China denies its soldiers’ casualties and PLA illustration by The Washington Times more >

• China had suffered in the recent clash (with India) in the Galwan Valley. Far from giving out the exact figure, he did not even acknowledge that there were casualties on the Chinese side, saying “I have no information to offer.”
  
  Yet again, when the question was posed the next day (June 23), Mr. Zhao avoided giving any details from the Chinese side, but was quick to retort that Indian media reports claiming that at least 40 Chinese soldiers were killed was “false information.”
  
  Incidentally, it was the same spokesman who gave (June 19) a detailed “step-by-step account of the Galwan clash (the Chinese version, of course) and China’s position on settling this incident.”
  
  
  Even a week after the incident China has refused to publicly admit that there had been casualties on its side, while India paid last homage to its martyrs with full state honors.
  
  What country does not even acknowledge the martyrdom of its uniformed soldiers at its borders, let alone pay them a respectable last homage? It is China, which reels under the fear that the admittance that it had lost troops, that too more in number than its opponent, could lead to such major trouble and domestic unrest, that the very regime of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could be put at stake.
  
  
  
  At the root of this fear is the simmering resentment running in the hearts and minds of 57 million veterans of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
  
  If this is the treatment meted out by the CCP regime to the martyrs of today, imagine the plight of PLA veterans, many of whom had participated in the bloody 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War or the Korean War. They have been holding frequent mass protests across China for years now, hoping to shame the government into recognizing its obligation toward those who battled along the country’s borders in the past.
  
  All they seek is better health care, pensions and jobs, as a mark of due gratitude for their service to the nation. Shockingly however, the country which has the world’s largest army, does not have a central agency to administer pensions and other benefits to its veterans. Resultantly, they are forced to depend on local governments for pensions, medical care and other basic benefits.
  
  However, due to wide disparity in the financial standings of the local governments, there is no standard or uniformity in what the veterans receive. After having given their youth and shed blood for the country, the veterans find themselves left by the CCP to the mercy of often corrupt local officials, making them feel like “donkeys slaughtered after they are too old to work a grindstone.”
  
  China’s Ministry of Defense, among its larger efforts of “military reform” orchestrated by Xi Jinping, terminated the old system of China’s army unit numbers and patches and adopted a new one. This change has made it more difficult for the protesting veterans to identify their affinities in the military forces and make appeals to them.
  
  
  Separately, fearful of organized mass protests, the Chinese authorities have subjected those veterans found participating in protests to suppression, surveillance, detentions and even beatings. There have been several instances of mysterious deaths of veterans who have been actively petitioning the government for their dues. Media mentions of veteran issues are also strictly censored in the country.
  
  All this is a far cry from the reverence these PLA veterans once elicited from the CCP, leading them to now even voice regret for having served the army. If such negative sentiments of the veterans is coupled with the rhetoric that the CCP leadership of today does not even acknowledge the lives laid by its soldiers at its borders, referring to the Galwan Valley causalities, the rank-and-file support for CCP leader President Xi Jinping, who is also chairman of the Central Military Commission, would be at grave threat.
  
  It could also adversely impact Mr. Xi’s ambitious goal of modernizing the PLA by 2035 and to become a top-tier military by 2050, by failing to attract better qualified and highly motivated soldiers.
  
  The PLA has long been a key pillar of the CCP’s power. If the sentiments of the serving PLA cadres are hurt and they get together with the millions of disgruntled veterans (which may be facilitated by those within the PLA who are already unhappy with Mr. Xi — and there are thousands of them, such as those who were hurt by Mr. Xi’s move to separate PLA from commercial activities), they could form a formidable force capable of challenging Mr. Xi’s leadership.
  
  Significantly, the CCP leadership cannot afford to undermine the veterans’ potential to launch a collective and “armed” anti-regime action. Hence, the continuing incidence of veterans’ protests, despite significant coercive pressure and bureaucratic measures, is a source of intense anxiety for Xi Jinping and the CCP leadership.
  
  • Jianli Yang is founder and president of Citizen Power Initiatives for China.
  

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/29/retired-and-hurt-pla-veterans-could-become-a-force/

Article in WT by Jianli Yang

washingtontimes is a rightwing tabloid rag that is owned by the South Korean Christian Cult, The Unification Movement, or simply called the Moonies. They believe their dead founder Sun Myung Moon was the reincarnation of Christ. WashingtonTimes has as much credibility as Epoch Times that is owned by the equally loony rightwing cult Falun Gong lol

 

[Figaro]

THE DEATH of 100 soldiers is being reported/admitted by chinease media

Where? I really don't understand the logic of the Chinese suffering higher casualties than the Indians ... how come then India did not capture a single Chinese soldier and yet the Indians admitted to the Chinese capturing 60 of theirs? Surely you must know how a battle works.

washingtontimes is a rightwing tabloid rag that is owned by the South Korean Christian Cult, The Unification Movement, or simply called the Moonies. They believe their dead founder Sun Myung Moon was the reincarnation of Christ. WashingtonTimes has as much credibility as Epoch Times that is owned by the equally loony rightwing cult Falun Gong lol

The Washington Times article has nothing to do with India at all. I have no idea why the Indian posters are even bringing that article here when it is entirely irrelevant to the discussion. Last I saw, China established a veterans affair bureau a couple years ago ... which I think is the right step to go to adequately compensate veterans.

 

[Tigers]

NewsX is another Sanghi fantasy channel. Who even believes these idiots?

All India can do is ban Chinese apps.

 

[Beast]

Chinese sources do hint at PLA casualties but do not provide an official figure.

For example: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/india-china-border-clash-explained.674768/

Casualty doesn't mean fatality. What is critical is number killed and not number hurt.