Indian MEA: China Took Our Territory. We Don't Accept It and We Protest Against it

[Dungeness]

But CDS Rawat says otherwise.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1458864350521868292

The whole country is sufferring a serious Bipolar Disorder?

 

[lonelyman]

The whole country is sufferring a serious Bipolar Disorder?

too much cow piss drink and too much dung eat

 

[knightmare]

There's a nuanced reasoning behind these statements arising from the fact that India lost this territory in 1959 & still considers its own; but reality is that it is on the Chinese side of the LAC. If interested you can go through this video.

 

[Dungeness]

There's a nuanced reasoning behind these statements arising from the fact that India lost this territory in 1959 & still considers its own; but reality is that it is on the Chinese side of the LAC. If interested you can go through this video.

India is a country stitched together by British Raj in 1940's. India did not lose any territory to anyone, as it had never owned any territory to begin with.

 

[knightmare]

India is a country stitched together by British Raj in 1940's. India did not lose any territory to anyone, as it had never owned any territory to begin with.

Every country owes it origins to some period in history & that same history forms the perception of what that country's boundaries are. The way you relate your perception of China to a particular dynasty's conquest the same way India does it. Whether it was a king of the local origins or a government ran by some power is immaterial. No country was ever formed by millions of people getting together.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Every country owes it origins to some period in history & that same history forms the perception of what that country's boundaries are. The way you relate your perception of China to a particular dynasty's conquest the same way India does it. Whether it was a king of the local origins or a government ran by some power is immaterial. No country was ever formed by millions of people getting together.

Other countries build their own history and other countries built india history.

 

[khansaheeb]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1458771681707659266

Indian reaction:-

 

[doorstar]

This is like how in school a student would go to another one and tell him "hey that other guy was insulting you behind your back" to try to prank him into a fight. clearly the US is trying to set a trap by telling them "hey they are inside your territory, what are you gonna do about it?". so regardless of whether it's true or not that China is building villages inside Indian territory, for sure India already knows where the Chinese are positioned and if the US was truly just trying to help India then they would share intelligence with them about Chinese positions in secret instead of declaring such information to media.

Indians are not that stupid nor suicidal that they will go to war for America. if anything they will want the kwaad to fight the Chinese for them and then give them the credit.

• "whatsoever that can harm you or benefit you is god-like"
• vigraha - "if you have a weak neighbor, coerce him to join you upon refusal invade him"
• samdhi - "if you have a strong neighbor never go to war against him instead find someone else to do it for you"
• yana - "this method requires building up one’s forces (or make a show of doing it). this could entail intimidating the enemies or forcing them to use resources to build up their own forces thus impoverishing them"
• asana - do nothing. when there is nothing to be gained from either waging war or establishing a treaty with another state. It could also be a state of prolonged waiting to consider the circumstances at hand before making a decision
• samsraya - this strategy essentially entails bandwagoning with a stronger state like the USA for your own security.
• dvaidhibhava - this strategy deals with coercing multiple states at once to fight your enemy state

 

[siegecrossbow]

Indians are not that stupid nor suicidal that they will go to war for America. if anything they will want the kwaad to fight the Chinese for them and then give them the credit.

• "whatsoever that can harm you or benefit you is god-like"
• "if you have a weak neighbor, coerce him to join you upon refusal invade him"
• "if you have a strong neighbor never go to war against him instead find someone else to do it for you"

Sounds like the philosophy of a middle school bully.

 

[MH.Yang]

Indians are not that stupid nor suicidal that they will go to war for America. if anything they will want the kwaad to fight the Chinese for them and then give them the credit.

• "whatsoever that can harm you or benefit you is god-like"
• vigraha - "if you have a weak neighbor, coerce him to join you upon refusal invade him"
• samdhi - "if you have a strong neighbor never go to war against him instead find someone else to do it for you"

This is just the opposite of Chinese philosophy. Chinese philosophy is "擒贼擒王(Sun Tzu's art of war, Thirty six schemes, the 18th schemes)." We should destroy the strongest enemy first, and then coerce other enemies to surrender.

擒賊擒王 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书

zh.m.wikipedia.org

 

[doorstar]

Sounds like the philosophy of a middle school bully.

This is just the opposite of Chinese philosophy. Chinese philosophy is "擒贼擒王(Sun Tzu's art of war, Thirty six schemes, the 18th schemes)." We should destroy the strongest enemy first, and then coerce other enemies to surrender.

https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/擒賊擒王

I am not done writing yet. I'll have it finished by tomorrow unless some mod deletes it before that as "post of no value" "religious insult" "provocation" "trolling"

@MH.Yang

 

[siegecrossbow]

I am not done writing yet. I'll have it finished by tomorrow unless some mod deletes it before that as "post of no value" "religious insult" "provocation" "trolling"

@MH.Yang

It can’t be religious insult if that’s exactly what the said religion states.

 

[Dungeness]

Every country owes it origins to some period in history & that same history forms the perception of what that country's boundaries are. The way you relate your perception of China to a particular dynasty's conquest the same way India does it. Whether it was a king of the local origins or a government ran by some power is immaterial. No country was ever formed by millions of people getting together.

India has been fighting with other countries for the land it never belonged, either religiously or ethnically, for the past 74 years, and for how long India wants to continue to play this 2.5 front game? Why don't you focus on building your Hindu marjority part of your country, before laying your eye on Muslin land or "chinkis" land?

Indian did salami-slice some territories from China when it was busy building its interior, now China wants to get those "sliced salami pieces" back and they are darn serious this time. Making an authoritarian govt. with 6 times of your economy into your top enamy, your wining odd is very slim. The sooner you realize you are in a lossing proposition, the sooner can you start building your own country.

 

[Stranagor]

View attachment 792763

If India misbehaves, China may be forced to compel a greater number of Indians check and count their ears.

 

[doorstar]

It can’t be religious insult if that’s exactly what the said religion states.

I've been "punished" for it here more than once in the distant past.

anyhoo it is a distortion of the writings of a great thinker and leader namely Chanakya who was an ancient teacher, philosopher, economist, jurist and royal advisor.

they have turned everything of his back to front. now I am done. cheers!