What's new

Indian fighting fantasy series (i.e. BS) regarding Balakot air duals.

.
AIM 120 are very vulnerable to chaff outside NEZ

And Su 30 used a combinative jamming chaff and manuevers to neutralize AMRAAMs.
The silver foils in AMRAAM wreck site in Reasi confirms it hit chaff.
thats just one missile where are the other 4?
 
. . . . . .
this is what Indians are claiming happened on 27th feb can anyone confirm this?

This story has so many flaws, I don't know where to start with. Nothing but another fan boy's imagination. Also, what on earth is a "differential in the snap up launch" mean even?

The story progression does not make any sense and the claim that IAF had no AWACS in station is plain bullshit.

Also, you can see the chutes in some video, they were all white.
 
. .
So based on your comment we can assume that if large Dakota's can be lost in Pir Panjal range, same can happen to fighter jet say SU-30?
Sukhois hit grpund with a huge blast so it would be easily detected.
Amraams and old Dakotas don't.
More importantly Amraams disintegrated after hitting chaff a large aircraft like Sukhoi wont disintegrate if it was hit by an AMRAAM or two.
So it's wreck will be visible to all.
After all AMRAAM fell near a village
 
.
Regarding those asking why the Su-30 MKIs did not fire on F-16s on 27 Feb: The F-16s fired their AIM-120C5 from 35 km away in a Head On engagement and in the 30-40s it took for the Su-30s to neutralize the missiles, F-16s had already turned back and were almost 40 km away
This meant the engagement had been converted into a Tail Chase engagement. Now in a Tail Chase engagement the maximum range of a BVR missile like R-77 or AIM-120 is only 30-35 km as tail chase range is only 1/3rd of max range at Head On. So any R-77 fired would have been a waste

Firstly, this doesn't make sense. When the AMRAAM were fired, the IAF jets, as said in the report, evaded them by "outrunning" their range apart from using ECM jams. A jet heading away cannot get a lock on a jet chasing it, and the jet chasing can not be at 30-40km in head on and also still be 30-40km after Sukhoi's finally turned back and so did the F-16's, the speed of separation would be far greater.
 
.
Firstly, this doesn't make sense. When the AMRAAM were fired, the IAF jets, as said in the report, evaded them by "outrunning" their range apart from using ECM jams. A jet heading away cannot get a lock on a jet chasing it, and the jet chasing can not be at 30-40km in head on and also still be 30-40km after Sukhoi's turned away and so did the F-16's, the speed of separation would be far greater.
They did not outrun them but simply jammed the missle causing them to crash.
Once seeing their ANRAAMs busted the F-16s turned back in the few seconds it took for the Su-30s to return to formation.
 
.
PAF deploy AWACS and IAF don't. Indian purposely do it on being gentleman and a manly thing to duel one one one. Is that excuse good for Indian to hide your embarrassment?
 
.
They did not outrun them but simply jammed the missle causing them to crash.
Once seeing their ANRAAMs busted the F-16s turned back in the few seconds it took for the Su-30s to return to formation.

Sorry to say this is not adding up. So the Sukhoi's were head on, jammed the AMRAAM, and deployed Chaff head on? How does that work.

It's like deploying flares head on, don't think that's a thing, is it.
 
.
They did not outrun them but simply jammed the missle causing them to crash.
Once seeing their ANRAAMs busted the F-16s turned back in the few seconds it took for the Su-30s to return to formation.
Cool story bro. The only problem is.........
Its a lie fed to you by Modi...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom