Nice subcontracting. We don't give two hoots about Indian Muslims, they are a herd of losers.
They are the ones who have to justify their loyalty to their Hindu master. We rule ourselves, they are ruled by Hindutvadasi establishment. Contrast couldn't be greater.
Umm, just to take the sub-contracting further, and what would Muslim Indians (not Indian Muslims) do with someone else caring two hoots about them? What difference would it make to anyone? Muslim Indians, Hindu Indians, atheist Indians, the lot? Considering that Muslim Indians are Indians, they are winners or losers depending on whether or not India itself is a winner or a loser.
As for justifying their loyalty to their Hindu masters, that is merely spiteful. Hindu Indians also have to prove their loyalty to their Hindu masters, as do Indians of every style, shape or description. That is, if there is any 'have to' in the picture. Nobody cares much for those self-appointed jerks who police the morals, the views, the rights of other Indians.
But let's move on. It might - just might - strike some readers that it isn't such a big deal that some of us here are ruling themselves in isolation, having got rid of the other religions and flavours very efficiently, whereas others here are ruling themselves in concert with others, ruling themselves while being a minority. It isn't such a big deal: there might even be a case that ruling ourselves in isolation is not an end in itself, ruling ourselves in isolation to our own benefit, and towards our progress and increasing prosperity and happiness might be a more appropriate objective.
Pity there hasn't been much progress reaching that objective.
Learn to behave like a moderator,Mr moderator.
That's not fair.
He has a right to write what he feels, without wearing his moderator (actually administrator) cap, when he is writing as a member. He need not behave in an identical manner in both the roles.
